Assessing the accuracy of machine learning interatomic potentials in predicting the elemental orderings: A case study of Li-Al alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
In atomistic modeling , machine learning interatomic potential (MLIP) has emerged as a powerful technique for studying alloy materials. However, given that MLIPs are often trained on a limited set of materials, a concern remains regarding the MLIP`s capability to make accurate predictions for a wide variety of phases, compositions, lattice structures, and elemental orderings across alloy systems. This paper presents a detailed analysis of MLIP`s performance in the Li-Al alloy system. Even trained only on a very limited number of phases, the MLIPs exhibit good accuracies in predicting a vast array of known and generated intermediate phases and their elemental orderings across the alloy system. We propose and demonstrate several evaluation metrics to assess and quantify the relative stabilities of complex elemental orderings, which is critical for studying the thermodynamics of alloys. Our testing process combined with the evaluation metrics is valuable for quantifying the performance and the transferability of MLIPs and for future improvements of MLIPs.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Basal dislocation/precipitate interactions in Mg–Al alloys: an atomistic investigation10.1088/1361-651X/ab2de0 ↗
2. Dislocation-induced Y segregation at basal-prismatic interfaces in Mg10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110241 ↗
3. Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potential for the Fe−Cu alloy system and cascade simulations on pure Fe and Fe-Cu alloys10.1103/PhysRevB.71.184205 ↗
4. Non-empirical phase equilibria in the Cr–Mo system: a combination of first-principles calculations, cluster expansion and Monte Carlo simulations10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.01.012 ↗
5. Computation of alloy phase diagrams at low temperatures10.1016/S0927-0256(97)00168-7 ↗
6. An accurate and transferable machine learning potential for carbon10.1063/5.0005084 ↗
7. Frustration in super-ionic conductors unraveled by the density of atomistic states
8. A stable cathode-solid electrolyte composite for high-voltage, long-cycle-life solid-state sodium-ion batteries10.1038/s41467-021-21488-7 ↗
9. Bridging the gap between simulated and experimental ionic conductivities in lithium superionic conductors
10. Simulating diffusion properties of solid-state electrolytes via a neural network potential: performance and training scheme10.1002/syst.201900031 ↗
11. Origins of structural and electronic transitions in disordered silicon10.1038/s41586-020-03072-z ↗
12. Development of interatomic potential for Al–Tb alloys using a deep neural network learning method10.1039/D0CP01689F ↗
13. Short- and medium-range orders in Al90Tb10 glass and their relation to the structures of competing crystalline phases10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116513 ↗
14. Prediction of stable Li-Sn compounds: boosting ab initio searches with neural network potentials10.1038/s41524-022-00825-4 ↗
15. Atomistic simulations of dislocation mobility in refractory high-entropy alloys and the effect of chemical short-range order10.1038/s41467-021-25134-0 ↗
16. Accelerating high-throughput searches for new alloys with active learning of interatomic potentials10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.031 ↗
17. Development of multimodal machine learning potentials: toward a physics-aware artificial intelligence10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00868 ↗
18. Machine-learned interatomic potentials for alloys and alloy phase diagrams10.1038/s41524-020-00477-2 ↗
19. Machine learning for alloys10.1038/s41578-021-00340-w ↗
20. Robustness of the cluster expansion: assessing the roles of relaxation and numerical error10.1103/PhysRevB.96.014107 ↗
21. Training data selection for accuracy and transferability of interatomic potentials10.1038/s41524-022-00872-x ↗
22. Machine learning for multi-fidelity scale bridging and dynamical simulations of materials10.1088/2515-7639/ab8c2d ↗
23. Active learning of uniformly accurate interatomic potentials for materials simulation
24. Multi-reward reinforcement learning based development of inter-atomic potential models for silica10.1038/s41524-023-01074-9 ↗
25. Discrepancies and error evaluation metrics for machine learning interatomic potentials10.1038/s41524-023-01123-3 ↗
26. A set of moment tensor potentials for zirconium with increasing complexity10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00488 ↗
27. A practical perspective on the concordance index for the evaluation and selection of prognostic time-to-event models10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103496 ↗
28. Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00022 ↗
29. De novo exploration and self-guided learning of potential-energy surfaces10.1038/s41524-019-0236-6 ↗
30. Machine learning potentials for multicomponent systems: the Ti-Al binary system10.1103/PhysRevB.102.174104 ↗
31. Short-range order and its impacts on the BCC MoNbTaW multi-principal element alloy by the machine-learning potential10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119041 ↗
32. Deep machine learning potentials for multicomponent metallic melts: development, predictability and compositional transferability10.1016/j.molliq.2021.118181 ↗
33. Qi · 2023 · 1
34. Disordered enthalpy–entropy descriptor for high-entropy ceramics discovery10.1038/s41586-023-06786-y ↗
35. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
36. Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations10.1063/1.472933 ↗
37. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
38. A high-throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.023 ↗
39. Tailoring the cation lattice for chloride lithium-ion conductors10.1002/aenm.202002356 ↗
40. Liu · 2023
41. Lattice match: an application to heteroepitaxy10.1063/1.333084 ↗
42. Crystal structural framework of lithium super-ionic conductors
43. A ReaxFF investigation of hydride formation in palladium nanoclusters via monte carlo and molecular dynamics simulations10.1021/jp411015a ↗
44. Development of a ReaxFF potential for Pd/O and application to palladium oxide formation10.1063/1.4815820 ↗
45. Maml - materials machine learning package
46. Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials10.1137/15M1054183 ↗
47. Active learning of linearly parametrized interatomic potentials10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.031 ↗
48. Performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 ↗
49. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗