Atomistic mechanism of hydrogen trapping in bcc Fe–Y solid solution: A first principles study
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract For many years trapping of hydrogen by solutes has been proposed as one of the mechanisms to mitigate hydrogen embrittlement in steels. In the 1980s, Myers et al. reported strong hydrogen trapping around yttrium centers in α -Fe with trapping energies of around −0.7 to −0.9 eV. To date, this is one of the strongest reported solute traps for hydrogen. Here, we use Fe–Y alloy as a model system to study mechanistic aspects of hydrogen trapping from first principles. We examine hydrogen binding at various defect complexes in Fe–Y. We show that binding at simple point defects such as Y atom, Y-monovacancy, and Y-divacancy complexes is weaker than what is required to explain experimental results, but binding at more complex defects involving multiple Y atoms and multiple vacancies is well in the range of the experimental observations. This leads us to infer that these complex defects are the strong hydrogen traps underlying experimental results. The effect of solutes in trapping hydrogen, however, is found to be very local, limited largely to within second nearest neighbor shells.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Borchers · Adv Eng Mater · 2008 · 10 · 1110.1002/adem.200700252 ↗
2. Hirth · Metall Mater Trans A · 1980 · 11 · 86110.1007/BF02654700 ↗
3. Gibala R, Kumnick AJ. Hydrogen trapping in iron and steels. In: Gibala R, Hehemann RF, editors. Hydrogen embrittlement and stress corrosion cracking. Proceedings of a troiano festschrift symposium. Ohio: ASM; 1984.
4. Myers · J Nucl Mater · 1989 · 165 · 910.1016/0022-3115(89)90502-3 ↗
5. Myers · Appl Phys Lett · 1980 · 37 · 16810.1063/1.91811 ↗
6. Kresse · J Comput Mater Sci · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
7. Blochl · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
8. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
9. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
10. Domain · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 65 · 02410310.1103/PhysRevB.65.024103 ↗
11. Monkhorst · Phys Rev B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
12. Tateyama · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 67 · 17410510.1103/PhysRevB.67.174105 ↗
13. Jiang · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 70 · 06410210.1103/PhysRevB.70.064102 ↗
14. Sanchez · Phys Rev B Condens Mater · 2008 · 78 · 01411310.1103/PhysRevB.78.014113 ↗
15. Besenbacher · J Appl Phys · 1987 · 61 · 178810.1063/1.338020 ↗
16. Juan · Surf Sci · 1999 · 421 · 110.1016/S0039-6028(98)00780-8 ↗
17. Pronsato · J Phys Condens Mater · 2004 · 16 · 690710.1088/0953-8984/16/39/023 ↗
18. Griessen · Phys Rev B · 1988 · 38 · 369010.1103/PhysRevB.38.3690 ↗
19. Myers · Phys Rev B · 1986 · 33 · 85410.1103/PhysRevB.33.854 ↗