Porous stage assessment of pressure assisted sintering modeling parameters: a ceramic identification method insensitive to final stage grain growth disturbance
Source abstract
Abstract
Pressure assisted sintering models such as Skorohod-Olevsky’s, Abouaf’s or Riedel’s require the identification of at least four parameters depending on porosity or temperature. The identification of these parameters is difficult at high temperature and for high pressures because of the non-linear mechanical behavior which makes them closely interconnected. To solve this problem, the fully dense behavior is identified first allowing determining the porous behavior afterward. This typical approach is well employed for metal or viscous materials. However, for ceramics the final stage grain growth makes the fully dense mechanical tests irrelevant; because the equivalent dense phase behavior of sintered specimens has bigger grains (then longer diffusion distances) than in initial/intermediate stages of sintering. Consequently, most of the parameters of these ceramics models compensate the dense parameters overestimation by an underestimation in the porous parameters values. In this paper we propose a unique formulation based on sinter-forging and die compaction which directly identify all the parameters from the porous stage. This comprehensive determination is possible by a non-reductive hypothesis on the shear modulus function shape and the experimental determination of radial/vertical displacement on sinter-forging tests. Such an approach allows an instantaneous determination of the parameters insensitive from the actual grain size of the porous ceramic.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Effect of Pore Distribution on Microstructure Development: III, Model Experiments10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04148.x ↗
2. Modeling zirconia sintering trajectory for obtaining translucent submicronic ceramics for dental implant applications10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.061 ↗
3. A continuum approach for modeling gravitational effects on grain settling and shape distortion during liquid phase sintering of tungsten heavy alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.059 ↗
4. Spark-plasma-sintering and finite element method: From the identification of the sintering parameters of a submicronic α -alumina powder to the development of complex shapes10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.003 ↗
5. Current understanding and future research directions at the onset of the next century of sintering science and technology10.1111/jace.14919 ↗
6. Rheological basis of the theory of sintering
7. Creep of Power-Law Material Containing Spherical Voids10.1115/1.2899512 ↗
8. Inelastic deformation of porous materials10.1016/0022-5096(89)90014-8 ↗
9. The densification of powders by power-law creep during hot isostatic pressing10.1016/0956-7151(92)90196-L ↗
10. A spark plasma sintering densification modeling approach: from polymer, metals to ceramics10.1007/s10853-018-2096-8 ↗
11. Swelling negation during sintering of sterling silver: An experimental and theoretical approach10.1016/j.rinp.2018.08.035 ↗
12. Modeling of conventional hot compaction and Spark Plasma Sintering based on modified micromechanical models of porous materials10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.12.002 ↗
13. Contribution of Electric Current into Densification Kinetics During Spark Plasma Sintering of Conductive Powder10.1111/jace.13816 ↗
14. Abouaf · 1985
15. Nicolle · 1999
16. Rheology of Porous Alumina and Simulation of Hot Isostatic Pressing10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04479.x ↗
17. Finite element simulation of hot isostatic pressing of metal powders10.1002/nme.1620250116 ↗
18. Constitutive behaviour of metal powder during hot forming. Part I: Experimental investigation with lead powder as a simulation material10.1016/S0997-7538(99)00102-3 ↗
19. Constitutive behaviour of metal powder during hot forming.: Part II: Unified viscoplastic modelling10.1016/S0997-7538(99)00101-1 ↗
20. Identification of the Norton-Green Compaction Model for the Prediction of the Ti-6Al-4V Densification During the Spark Plasma Sintering Process10.1002/adem.201600348 ↗
21. Porosity dependence of powder compaction constitutive parameters: Determination based on spark plasma sintering tests10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.07.026 ↗
22. In-situ creep law determination for modeling Spark Plasma Sintering of TiAl 48-2-2 powder10.1016/j.intermet.2017.03.006 ↗
23. A predictive model to reflect the final stage of spark plasma sintering of submicronic α-alumina10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.048 ↗
24. Predicting final stage sintering grain growth affected by porosity
25. Consolidation enhancement in spark-plasma sintering: Impact of high heating rates10.1063/1.2822189 ↗
26. Master sintering curve with dissimilar grain growth trajectories: A case study on MgAl2O410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.003 ↗
27. Rahaman · 2007
28. German · 1996
29. Theory of sintering: from discrete to continuum10.1016/S0927-796X(98)00009-6 ↗
30. Creep behaviour of alumina, zirconia and zirconia-toughened alumina10.1016/S0955-2219(96)00160-4 ↗
31. Powder/die friction in the spark plasma sintering process: Modelling and experimental identification10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.01.040 ↗
32. Some fundamental experiments on high temperature creep10.1016/0022-5096(55)90054-5 ↗
33. Effect of electric current on densification behavior of conductive ceramic powders consolidated by spark plasma sintering10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.010 ↗
34. Activation energies for creep of high-purity aluminum10.1016/0001-6160(57)90169-4 ↗
35. Spark plasma sintering of a commercially available granulated zirconia powder: I. Sintering path and hypotheses about the mechanism(s) controlling densification10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.048 ↗
36. A Numerical Model for Powder Densification by SPS Technique10.1002/adem.201000340 ↗
37. Thermal-electrical-mechanical simulation of the nickel densification by Spark Plasma Sintering. Comparison with experiments10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.06.012 ↗
38. Manufacturing and characterization of porous ceramic capillary membranes for enzyme functionalization through click chemistry10.1007/s40430-020-2254-1 ↗
39. Quantitative analysis for in situ sintering of 3% yttria-stablized zirconia in the transmission electron microscope10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.12.011 ↗
40. Contact resistances in spark plasma sintering: From in-situ and ex-situ determinations to an extended model for the scale up of the process10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.12.010 ↗
41. Estimate of the Activation Energies for Boundary Diffusion from Rate-Controlled Sintering of Pure Alumina, and Alumina Doped with Zirconia or Titania10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05175.x ↗
42. Impact of high energy ball milling on densification behaviour of magnesium aluminate spinel evaluated by master sintering curve and constant rate of heating approach10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.051 ↗
43. Sintering Analysis of a Fine-Grained Alumina-Magnesia Spinel Powder10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04271.x ↗
44. Investigation of sintering mechanisms of alumina using kinetic field and master sintering diagrams10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.01.025 ↗
45. The effective mechanical properties of nonlinear isotropic composites10.1016/0022-5096(91)90030-R ↗
46. A plasticity theory for porous solids10.1016/0020-7403(72)90063-X ↗
47. A numerical model for hot deformation of metal powders
48. Practical applications of hotisostatic Pressing diagrams: Four case studies10.1007/BF02651618 ↗
49. Densification maps for spark plasma sintering of nanocrystalline MgO ceramics10.1016/j.msea.2005.07.024 ↗
50. Sintering dense nanocrystalline 3YSZ ceramics without grain growth by plastic deformation as dominating mechanism10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.228 ↗
51. Modeling sintering anisotropy in ceramic stereolithography of silica10.1016/j.actamat.2019.10.032 ↗
52. Combined-Stage Sintering Model10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb05549.x ↗