Grain rotation by dislocation climb in a finite-size grain boundary
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We investigate the kinetics of grain rotation in a bicrystal with a tilt grain boundary by studying the relaxation of an edge dislocation wall in a discrete-dislocation approach. The boundary is infinitely extended in one direction and of finite size in the orthogonal one. The relaxation process is simulated numerically by solving the equations of motion of the dislocations, assuming climb by diffusive transport in the boundary plane. Surprisingly, we find that boundaries never rotate all the way into coincidence. Instead, the final state is a metastable array with 18 dislocations and, hence, with a finite misorientation that depends on the boundary length and the Burgers vector. All boundaries with fewer than 18 dislocations are also metastable. The relaxation time to reach the metastable configuration is found to be proportional to the logarithm of the number of dislocations and to the cube of the length of the boundary. We give a critical discussion of image force arguments that underlie earlier work on grain rotation, and verify that the present analysis of image forces does satisfy the boundary conditions at the free surfaces. The results have implications for the kinetics of rotation of nanoparticles on a substrate and for the stability of grain and subgrain boundaries in thin metal films.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Hu · 1963
2. Doherty · Metal Sci · 1974 · 8 · 13210.1179/msc.1974.8.1.132 ↗
3. King · Mater Sci Forum · 1996 · 204–206 · 35510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.204-206.355 ↗
4. Harris · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 262310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00467-9 ↗
5. Klinger · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 669110.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.026 ↗
6. Shewmon · 1966
7. Herrmann · Acta Metall · 1976 · 24 · 35310.1016/0001-6160(76)90010-9 ↗
8. Sautter · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 46710.1016/0001-6160(77)90237-1 ↗
9. Kuhn · Acta Metall · 1979 · 27 · 95910.1016/0001-6160(79)90183-4 ↗
10. Mykura · Acta Metal · 1979 · 27 · 24310.1016/0001-6160(79)90102-0 ↗
11. Chan · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 111310.1016/0001-6160(85)90205-6 ↗
12. Chan · Acta Metall · 1986 · 34 · 219110.1016/0001-6160(86)90164-1 ↗
13. Moldovan · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 352110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00240-3 ↗
14. Shan · Adv Eng Mater · 2005 · 7 · 60310.1002/adem.200500034 ↗
15. Moldovan · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 339710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00153-2 ↗
16. Cahn · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 488710.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.048 ↗
17. Haslam · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 209710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00011-9 ↗
18. Markmann · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 49 · 63710.1016/S1359-6462(03)00401-9 ↗
19. Read · Phys Rev B · 1950 · 78 · 27510.1103/PhysRev.78.275 ↗
20. Cahn · 1990 · 185
21. King · Mater Sci Forum · 1995 · 189–190 · 14310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.189-190.143 ↗
22. Ashkenazy · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 64 · 20540910.1103/PhysRevB.64.205409 ↗
23. Nabarro · J Appl Phys · 1978 · 49 · 544510.1063/1.324511 ↗
24. Siems · Phys Stat Sol · 1962 · 2 · 42110.1002/pssb.19620020407 ↗
25. Jagannadham · Phys Stat Solidi (a) · 1978 · 50 · 29310.1002/pssa.2210500135 ↗
26. Marcinkowski · 1979
27. Gutkin · Phys Stat Sol (a) · 1991 · 125 · 10710.1002/pssa.2211250108 ↗
28. Vladimirov · Phys Metals Metallogr · 1985 · 60 · 1106
29. Weissmüller · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 436610.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.060 ↗
30. Hirth · 1982
31. Mura · 1968 · vol. 3
32. Arzt · Acta Metall · 1983 · 31 · 197710.1016/0001-6160(83)90015-9 ↗
33. Kaur · 1995
34. Nazarov · Int Sci · 2000 · 8 · 315
35. Bachurin · Phil Mag · 2003 · 83 · 265310.1080/1478643031000137895 ↗
36. Martin · Phys Stat Sol (b) · 1992 · 172 · 12110.1002/pssb.2221720113 ↗
37. Kaur · 1989