Transmission electron microscopy of antiphase boundary-like structure of B19′ martensite in Ti–Ni shape memory alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An antiphase boundary (APB)-like structure of the B19′ martensite in Ti–Ni alloy was investigated by transmission electron microscopy. The APB-like structure shows atomic shifts on both the (0 1 0)B19′ plane along the c-axis and the (0 0 1)B19′ plane along the b-axis; a kind of ledge-and-step structure on the b–c plane, in addition to a displacement along the a-axis. The displacement vector can be expressed as R = 〈−0.1648 1/2 0.4328〉 in terms of the conventional atomic coordinates of Ti and Ni in the B19′ martensite. The APB-like structure is not inherited from APB in the B2 parent phase. We conclude that the APB-like structure is developed by accidental impingement of differently nucleated martensitic domains during the transformation. This structure is defined as a kind of stacking fault with an APB-like contrast.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Matsuda · Mater Trans · 2008 · 49 · 46110.2320/matertrans.MBW200715 ↗
2. Donkersloot · J Less-Common Met · 1970 · 20 · 8310.1016/0022-5088(70)90092-5 ↗
3. Theory and direct observation of antiphase boundaries and dislocations in superlattice
4. Matsuda · Philos Mag Lett · 2007 · 87 · 5910.1080/09500830601105667 ↗
5. Knowles · Acta Metall · 1981 · 29 · 10110.1016/0001-6160(81)90091-2 ↗
6. Nishida M, Yamauchi K, Chiba A, Higashi Y. Internal structures of triangular self-accommodating martensite in Ti–Ni shape memory alloy. In: Wayman CM, Perkins J, editors. Proceedings of the international conference on martensitic transformation. Monterey: Monterey Institute for Advanced Studies; 1993. p. 881.
7. Yamauchi · Mater Trans JIM · 1996 · 37 · 21010.2320/matertrans1989.37.210 ↗
8. Madangopal · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 534710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00161-4 ↗
9. Tirry · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–482 · 42010.1016/j.msea.2006.12.214 ↗
10. Otsuka · Phys Status Solidi · 1971 · 5 · 45710.1002/pssa.2210050220 ↗
11. Ren · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 38 · 166910.1016/S1359-6462(98)00078-5 ↗
12. Pennycook · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · S14910.1016/0956-7151(92)90275-J ↗
13. Shibata · Nature · 2004 · 428 · 73010.1038/nature02410 ↗
14. Kogure · J Electron Microsc · 2010 · 59 · 26310.1093/jmicro/dfq003 ↗
15. Kudoh · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 204910.1016/0001-6160(85)90128-2 ↗
16. Nishida · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 121910.1016/0956-7151(94)00332-C ↗
17. Whelan · Philos Mag · 1957 · 2 · 112110.1080/14786435708242742 ↗
18. Nishiyama · 1978
19. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 289710.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.028 ↗
20. Moberly · Mater Sci Forum · 1990 · 56–58 · 60510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.56-58.605 ↗
21. Yamabe-Mitarai · Mater Trans · 2006 · 47 · 65010.2320/matertrans.47.650 ↗