journal article·2010-08

Evolution of the relaxation spectrum during the strain glass transition of Ti48.5Ni51.5 alloy

Yu Wang, Yumei Zhou, Jian Zhang, Xiangdong Ding, Sen Yang, Xiaoping Song, Xiaobing Ren, Kazuhiro Otsuka

Acta Materialia· Volume 58· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The glass transition is essentially a kinetics governed freezing transition and is characterized by a broad distribution of relaxation times. Quantitative determination of the relaxation spectrum of a glass system is thus crucial in understanding the glassy behavior. In this study the temperature evolution of the relaxation spectrum of a new glass system, a Ti 48.5 Ni 51.5 strain glass, was obtained, which provides a full description of the kinetic relaxation behavior in this system. Our results show that the typical glassy features of strain glass can be readily understood from the relaxation spectrum. We further found that the system shows a transition from Vogel–Fulcher kinetics to Arrhenius kinetics around the freezing temperature. Moreover, our result answers some important questions, such as why the onset of non-ergodicty starts above the freezing temperature and why the precursor state with a static tweed microstructure appears to be ergodic prior to the normal martensitic transformation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Mydosh · 1993
2. Binder · 2005
3. Jérôme · Nature · 1997 · 386 · 58910.1038/386589a0 ↗
4. Binder · Rev Mod Phys · 1986 · 58 · 80110.1103/RevModPhys.58.801 ↗
5. Santen · Nature · 2000 · 405 · 55010.1038/35014561 ↗
6. Birge · Phys Rev B · 1984 · 30 · 230610.1103/PhysRevB.30.2306 ↗
7. Courtens · Phys Rev Lett · 1984 · 52 · 6910.1103/PhysRevLett.52.69 ↗
8. Pareige · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 05410210.1103/PhysRevB.75.054102 ↗
9. Su · J Appl Phys · 2001 · 90 · 634510.1063/1.1415759 ↗
10. Glazounov · Appl Phys Lett · 1998 · 73 · 85610.1063/1.122024 ↗
11. Sarkar · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 20570210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.205702 ↗
12. Wang · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 97 · 22570310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.225703 ↗
13. Wang · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 76 · 13220110.1103/PhysRevB.76.132201 ↗
14. Wang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 288510.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.032 ↗
15. Ren · Philos Mag · 2010 · 90 · 14110.1080/14786430903074771 ↗
16. Schryvers · Ultramicroscopy · 1990 · 32 · 24110.1016/0304-3991(90)90002-4 ↗
17. Murakami · Philos Mag Lett · 2001 · 81 · 63110.1080/09500830110063950 ↗
18. Murakami · J Microscopy · 2000 · 203 · 2210.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00913.x ↗
19. Alvarez · Phys Rev B · 1991 · 44 · 730610.1103/PhysRevB.44.7306 ↗
20. Hüser · J Phys C Solid State Phys · 1986 · 19 · 369710.1088/0022-3719/19/19/023 ↗
21. Daniel · 1967
22. Havriliak · 1997
23. Ediger · J Phys Chem · 1996 · 100 · 1320010.1021/jp953538d ↗
24. Semenovskaya · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 436710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00071-2 ↗
25. Kartha · Phys Rev Lett · 1991 · 67 · 363010.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3630 ↗
26. Kartha · Phys Rev B · 1995 · 52 · 80310.1103/PhysRevB.52.803 ↗