journal article·2014-10

Triple junction controlled grain growth in two-dimensional polycrystals and thin films: Self-similar growth laws and grain size distributions

Peter Streitenberger, Dana Zöllner

Acta Materialia· Volume 78
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Triple junction controlled grain growth in two-dimensional nanocrystalline polycrystals is modeled by attributing to each structural feature of a polygonal grain a finite mobility. By considering grain growth as a dissipative process that is driven by the reduction of the Gibbs free interface energy, a general grain evolution equation is derived that separates into two types of possible self-similar growth kinetics. For the case of pure triple junction drag the influence of finite triple junction mobilities on metrical and topological properties is studied. Analytical expressions of the self-similar grain size distribution are derived, which compare very well with results from the modified Monte Carlo Potts model and front-tracking vertex dynamic simulations, taking into account size effects in triple junction limited grain growth. In addition, the analytical grain size distributions are used for a theoretical description of experimental data obtained in nanocrystalline thin films upon annealing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Thompson · Annu Rev Mater Sci · 1990 · 20 · 24510.1146/annurev.ms.20.080190.001333 ↗
2. Thompson · Solid State Phys · 2001 · 55 · 26910.1016/S0081-1947(01)80006-0 ↗
3. Gottstein · 2010
4. Gottstein · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 38 · 154110.1016/S1359-6462(98)00074-8 ↗
5. Gottstein · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 70310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00391-3 ↗
6. Gottstein · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 153510.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.006 ↗
7. Gottstein · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 106510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.057 ↗
8. Barrales Mora · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 115110.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.013 ↗
9. Gottstein · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 91410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.017 ↗
10. Koch · 2007
11. Barmak · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 105910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.060 ↗
12. Barmak · Mater Sci Forum · 2012 · 715–716 · 47310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.715-716.473 ↗
13. Barmak · Prog Mater Sci · 2013 · 58 · 98710.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.004 ↗
14. Weygand · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 655910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00318-8 ↗
15. Weygand · Interface Sci · 1999 · 7 · 28510.1023/A:1008773411083 ↗
16. Novikov · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 85710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.013 ↗
17. Zöllner · 2008
18. Barrales-Mora · Math Comp Simul · 2010 · 80 · 141110.1016/j.matcom.2009.08.005 ↗
19. Barrales-Mora · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 54610.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.022 ↗
20. Ito · Comput Mater Sci · 2012 · 62 · 11710.1016/j.commatsci.2012.05.034 ↗
21. Zöllner · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 67 · 4110.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.03.016 ↗
22. Zöllner · Comput Mater Sci · 2013 · 79 · 75910.1016/j.commatsci.2013.07.031 ↗
23. Zöllner · Model Sim Mater Sci Eng · 2014 · 22 · 02502810.1088/0965-0393/22/2/025028 ↗
24. Johnson · Acta Mater · 2014 · 67 · 13410.1016/j.actamat.2013.12.012 ↗
25. von Neumann · 1952
26. Mullins · J Appl Phys · 1956 · 27 · 90010.1063/1.1722511 ↗
27. Streitenberger · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 423510.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.048 ↗
28. Zöllner · Comput Mater Sci · 2011 · 50 · 271210.1016/j.commatsci.2011.04.024 ↗
29. Fischer · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 107510.1080/0141861031000068966 ↗
30. Fischer · 2011 · 5
31. Fischer · Acta Mater · 2014 · 67 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.050 ↗
32. Rios · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 62910.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.026 ↗
33. Glicksman · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 310.1080/14786430412331329892 ↗
34. Fradkov · Adv Phys · 1994 · 43 · 73910.1080/00018739400101559 ↗
35. Mullins · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 621910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00259-6 ↗
36. Atkinson · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 46910.1016/0001-6160(88)90079-X ↗
37. Gottstein · Acta Metall Mater · 1993 · 41 · 326710.1016/0956-7151(93)90056-X ↗
38. Fischer · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 470410.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.018 ↗
39. Streitenberger · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 46110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.009 ↗
40. Streitenberger · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 39 · 171910.1016/S1359-6462(98)00373-X ↗
41. Hillert · Acta Metall · 1965 · 13 · 22710.1016/0001-6160(65)90200-2 ↗
42. Abbruzzese · Mater Sci Forum · 1996 · 204–206 · 55
43. Marthinsen · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 168110.1016/1359-6454(95)00262-6 ↗
44. Streitenberger · 2001 · vol. 1 · 257
45. Brandt · 2004 · 306
46. Zöllner · Acta Mater · 2014 · 70 · 29010.1016/j.actamat.2014.02.039 ↗
47. Streitenberger P, Zöllner D. [to be published].
48. Lifshitz · J Phys Chem Solids · 1961 · 19 · 3510.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
49. Wagner · Z Elektrochem · 1961 · 65 · 581
50. Mullins · Acta Metall · 1958 · 6 · 41410.1016/0001-6160(58)90020-8 ↗
51. Frost · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 145510.1016/0956-7151(90)90114-V ↗
52. Backofen · Acta Mater · 2014 · 64 · 7210.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.034 ↗
53. Zöllner · Pract Metall · 2010 · 47 · 61810.3139/147.110100 ↗