journal article·2014-07

Extended defects, ideal strength and actual strengths of finite-sized metallic glasses

Pengyang Zhao, Ju Li, Yunzhi Wang

Acta Materialia· Volume 73
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Initial condition dependence is the key to understanding the difference between ideal strength and actual strength of both crystalline and amorphous materials. Besides intrinsic structural heterogeneities in metallic glasses (MGs), a class of “extended defects” based on the “connected atomistic free volume” (CAFV) is proposed to define the microstructure (initial condition), which is crucial to understanding the strength. To explore these concepts and theories, deformation of finite-sized MG samples with different populations of pre-existing extended defects (damages) are simulated using a nanometer-scale shear transformation zone (STZ) model based on microelasticity and the kinetic Monte Carlo method. A “smaller is stronger” effect on the peak stress of simulated true stress–strain curves is seen in samples with pre-existing damage introduced as post-activated STZ clusters. Samples with “chemically contaminated” surface STZs also exhibit a size effect on the peak stress, and depending on whether the surface STZs are softer or harder than the bulk STZs, smaller can be either weaker or stronger.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Hull · 2001
2. Zhu · Prog Mater Sci · 2010 · 55 · 71010.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.001 ↗
3. Johnson · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 19550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.195501 ↗
4. Tian · Nat Commun · 2012 · 3 · 60910.1038/ncomms1619 ↗
5. Wang · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 537010.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.019 ↗
6. Wang · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 136810.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.035 ↗
7. Cheng · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59
8. Greer · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 65410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
9. Liu · J Appl Phys · 2012 · 112 · 06350410.1063/1.4752280 ↗
10. Bulatov · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1994 · 2 · 16710.1088/0965-0393/2/2/001 ↗
11. Homer · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 282310.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.035 ↗
12. Ogata · Intermetallics · 2006 · 14 · 103310.1016/j.intermet.2006.01.022 ↗
13. Zhao · Int J Plasticity · 2013 · 40 · 110.1016/j.ijplas.2012.06.007 ↗
14. Eshelby · Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser A – Math · 1957 · 241 · 37610.1098/rspa.1957.0133 ↗
15. Li · Acta Mater · 2013
16. Yu · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 22020110.1103/PhysRevB.81.220201 ↗
17. Rodney · Phys Rev Lett · 2009 · 102 · 23550310.1103/PhysRevLett.102.235503 ↗
18. Wang Yu · J Appl Phys · 2002 · 92 · 135110.1063/1.1492859 ↗
19. Stukowski · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2012 · 20 · 08500710.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007 ↗
20. Flores · J Mater Res · 2002 · 17 · 115310.1557/JMR.2002.0171 ↗
21. Li · Philos Mag A – Phys Condens Matter Struct Defect Mech Prop · 2002 · 82 · 2623
22. Wang · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2013 · 110 · 1972510.1073/pnas.1320235110 ↗
23. Pekarskaya · J Mater Res · 2001 · 16 · 251310.1557/JMR.2001.0344 ↗
24. Stillinger · Phys Rev E · 1999 · 59 · 4810.1103/PhysRevE.59.48 ↗
25. Srolovitz · Philos Mag A · 1981 · 44 · 84710.1080/01418618108239553 ↗
26. Li · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 571110.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.002 ↗
27. Morris · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 106 · 16550210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.165502 ↗
28. Mayr · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 97 · 19550110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.195501 ↗
29. Pan · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2008 · 105 · 1476910.1073/pnas.0806051105 ↗
30. Roduner · Chem Soc Rev · 2006 · 35 · 58310.1039/b502142c ↗
31. Delogu · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 18410910.1103/PhysRevB.79.184109 ↗
32. Shim · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 50310.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.033 ↗
33. Bei · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 91 · 11191510.1063/1.2784948 ↗
34. Chen · Nano Lett · 2013 · 13 · 446210.1021/nl402384r ↗
35. Bian · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 81 · 473910.1063/1.1530371 ↗
36. Dubach · Philos Mag Lett · 2007 · 87 · 69510.1080/09500830701494037 ↗
37. Argon · Acta Metall · 1983 · 31 · 49910.1016/0001-6160(83)90038-X ↗
38. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
39. Shimizu · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 429310.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.024 ↗
40. Shimizu · Mater Trans · 2007 · 48 · 292310.2320/matertrans.MJ200769 ↗
41. Lu · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 342910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00164-2 ↗
42. Zhang · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 07190710.1063/1.2336598 ↗
43. Statistical analysis of extreme values: with applications to insurance, finance, hydrology and other fields
44. Jang · Nat Mater · 2010 · 9 · 21510.1038/nmat2622 ↗
45. Kim · Adv Funct Mater · 2011 · 21 · 455010.1002/adfm.201101164 ↗
46. Murali · Appl Phys Lett · 2012 · 100 · 20190110.1063/1.4717744 ↗
47. Lewandowski · Nat Mater · 2005 · 5 · 1510.1038/nmat1536 ↗
48. Greer · Mater Sci Eng R: Rep · 2013 · 74 · 7110.1016/j.mser.2013.04.001 ↗
49. Bei · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 476210.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.030 ↗
50. Homer · Acta Mater · 2014 · 63 · 4410.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.050 ↗
51. Mura · 1991
52. Lee · Int J Damage Mech · 2007 · 16 · 33110.1177/1056789506067934 ↗