journal article·2012-04

Pseudoelastic deformation and size effects during in situ transmission electron microscopy tensile testing of NiTi

S. Manchuraju, A. Kroeger, C. Somsen, A. Dlouhy, G. Eggeler, P.M. Sarosi, P.M. Anderson, M.J. Mills

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 6-7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The stress-induced B2–B19′ transformation in aged 51 at.% NiTi was investigated using in situ straining transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Increased applied strain along [1 1 0] B2 transforms B2 into plates containing B19′ variants that are related by a (1 1 0) B2 compound twin plane. This atypical twin plane is explained by relaxing the invariant plane constraint in the crystallographic theory of martensite (CTM) to an invariant line constraint. The relaxation is rationalized from the thin foil geometry. The relaxed CTM approach, coupled with conditions to maximize transformation strain along the loading axis and minimize elastic energy, predicts the observed twin interface, diffraction patterns, and interface with the B2 austenite. These results demonstrate subtleties in interpreting thin foil TEM results regarding martensitic transformations, and translating those results to bulk response.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Frick · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 384510.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.034 ↗
2. Frick · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 710.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.051 ↗
3. Manjeri · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 108 · 02350110.1063/1.3445262 ↗
4. Norfleet · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 354910.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.009 ↗
5. Kröger · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 438–440 · 51310.1016/j.msea.2006.04.119 ↗
6. Kröger · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–482 · 45210.1016/j.msea.2007.02.169 ↗
7. Tirry · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–82 · 42010.1016/j.msea.2006.12.214 ↗
8. Simon · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 185010.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.028 ↗
9. Hane · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 260310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00143-3 ↗
10. Nishida · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 121910.1016/0956-7151(94)00332-C ↗
11. Onda · Trans Mater JIM · 1992 · 33 · 35410.2320/matertrans1989.33.354 ↗
12. Krishnan · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 132510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00423-1 ↗
13. Sehitoglu · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 360910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00216-6 ↗
14. Zhang · Mat Sci Eng · 2004 · 374 · 29210.1016/j.msea.2004.03.013 ↗
15. Waitz · Mat Sci Eng · 2008 · 481-182A · 47910.1016/j.msea.2007.03.122 ↗
16. Waitz · J Mech Phys Solids · 2007 · 55 · 41910.1016/j.jmps.2006.06.006 ↗
17. Waitz · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 227310.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.033 ↗
18. Bhattacharya · 2003
19. Frenzel · J Alloys Compd · 2004 · 385 · 21410.1016/j.jallcom.2004.05.002 ↗
20. Eggeler · 2005
21. Michutta · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 352510.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.036 ↗
22. Michutta · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 378 · 15210.1016/j.msea.2003.11.061 ↗
23. Kudoh · Acta Metall Mater · 1985 · 33 · 204910.1016/0001-6160(85)90128-2 ↗
24. Otsuka · Prog Mater Sci · 2005 · 50 · 51110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
25. Bhattacharya · J Mech Phys Solids · 1999 · 47 · 53110.1016/S0022-5096(98)00043-X ↗