Application of the maximal entropy production principle to rapid solidification: A multi-phase-field model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Because the Cahn–Hillard and Allen–Cahn equations cannot deal with the additional constraints in the multi-phase-field models, several approximate treatments, e.g. a specific partition relation and the condition of equal or unequal diffusion potentials, were proposed. In this paper, the problem is solved successfully by the maximal entropy production principle and a model is developed for rapid solidification of a binary alloy system. Due to the mixture law used to define the free energy density, solute concentration and chemical potential jumps happen at an “imaginary” sharp interface between solid and liquid. The solute diffusions in solid and liquid are described by two independent equations and additional non-linear equations do not need to be employed to fix the solute concentrations of solid and liquid. Application to solute trapping during rapid solidification of Si–9 at.% As alloy shows that a good agreement between the model predictions and the experimental results is obtained. The interface and bulk contributions are decoupled at very low and very high interface velocities and in other cases the interaction between them depends weakly on the interface velocity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Boettinger · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 32 · 16310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.101901.155803 ↗
2. Chen · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 32 · 11310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
3. Steinbach · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 07300110.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 ↗
4. Wheeler · Phys Rev A · 1992 · 45 · 742410.1103/PhysRevA.45.7424 ↗
5. Karma · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 11570110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115701 ↗
6. Echebarria · Phys Rev E · 2004 · 70 · 06160410.1103/PhysRevE.70.061604 ↗
7. Tiaden · Phys D · 1998 · 115 · 7310.1016/S0167-2789(97)00226-1 ↗
8. Kim · Phys Rev E · 1999 · 60 · 718610.1103/PhysRevE.60.7186 ↗
9. Eiken · Phys Rev E · 2006 · 73 · 06612210.1103/PhysRevE.73.066122 ↗
10. Steinbach · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 268910.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.035 ↗
11. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 270210.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.032 ↗
12. Cahn · J Chem Phys · 1958 · 28 · 25810.1063/1.1744102 ↗
13. Allen · Acta Metall · 1979 · 27 · 108510.1016/0001-6160(79)90196-2 ↗
14. Onsager · Phys Rev · 1931 · 37 · 40510.1103/PhysRev.37.405 ↗
15. Ziegler · 1983
16. Martyushev · Phys Rep · 2006 · 426 · 110.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.001 ↗
17. Svoboda · Philos Mag B · 1991 · 64 · 74910.1080/13642819108207635 ↗
18. Svoboda · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 369910.1080/14786430500267760 ↗
19. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 136910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00443-8 ↗
20. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 304310.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.041 ↗
21. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 95910.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.030 ↗
22. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 395310.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.027 ↗
23. Gamsjäger · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 259910.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.002 ↗
24. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 477510.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.020 ↗
25. Svoboda · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 385 · 166
26. Kozeschnik · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 385 · 157
27. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 489610.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.016 ↗
28. Fischer · Phil Mag · 2003 · 83 · 107510.1080/0141861031000068966 ↗
29. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 446710.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.012 ↗
30. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 539510.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.021 ↗
31. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 39610.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.044 ↗
32. Wang · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 144410.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.038 ↗
33. Moelans · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 107710.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.038 ↗
34. Baker JC. PhD thesis. MIT; 1970.
35. Hillert · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 448110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00336-5 ↗
36. Wang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 74610.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.021 ↗
37. Aziz · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 233510.1016/0001-6160(88)90333-1 ↗
38. Ahmad · PRE · 1998 · 58 · 343610.1103/PhysRevE.58.3436 ↗
39. Danilov · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 465910.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.045 ↗
40. Lebedev · Int J Mater Res · 2010 · 101 · 47310.3139/146.110297 ↗
41. Galenko · Phys Rev E · 2011 · 84 · 04114310.1103/PhysRevE.84.041143 ↗
42. Gear · 1971
43. Kittl · J Cryst Growth · 1995 · 148 · 17210.1016/0022-0248(94)00836-1 ↗
44. Kittl · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 479710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00276-7 ↗
45. Eckler · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 97510.1016/0956-7151(94)90291-7 ↗
46. Li · J Cryst Growth · 2010 · 312 · 98210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.12.070 ↗
47. Nestler · Phys D · 2000 · 138 · 11410.1016/S0167-2789(99)00184-0 ↗
48. Bollada · Phys D · 2012 · 241 · 81610.1016/j.physd.2012.01.006 ↗
49. Choudhury · Phys Rev E · 2012 · 85 · 02160210.1103/PhysRevE.85.021602 ↗
50. Plapp · Phys Rev E · 2011 · 84 · 03160110.1103/PhysRevE.84.031601 ↗