Analysis of low-velocity impact on FG-CNT reinforced cantilever sandwich beams: An FOSNDT approach
Source abstract
Abstract
This study analyzes the low-velocity impact response of cantilever sandwich beams with foam cores and carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforced facesheets. Using the fifth-order shear and normal deformation theory, we explore three CNT distribution types through the thickness of the facesheets: uniformly distributed UD, functionally graded-V FG-V, and functionally graded-Λ FG-Λ. The contact force during impact is calculated according to Hertz contact law. Our findings indicate that the FG-V distribution offers the highest contact stiffness, resulting in reduced deflection compared to UD and FG-Λ distributions. Additionally, an increase in the core-to-face thickness ratio leads to decreased deflection and increased contact force, attributed to enhanced beam stiffness. The volumetric fraction of CNTs also plays a critical role, increased CNT content raises beam stiffness, decreasing deflection and enhancing contact force. Furthermore, the impactor’s initial velocity directly influences the deflection and contact force, with higher velocities leading to greater deflections due to increased kinetic energy. This comprehensive analysis underscores the significant effects of CNT distribution, volumetric fraction, and geometrical parameters on the dynamic response of sandwich beams under impact conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/363603a010.1038/363603a0 ↗
2. 10.1038/363605a010.1038/363605a0 ↗
3. 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
4. 10.1177/089270571985361110.1177/0892705719853611 ↗
5. 10.1177/089270571982878910.1177/0892705719828789 ↗
6. 10.1177/089270571880458810.1177/0892705718804588 ↗
7. Thi L · J Thermoplast Compos Mater · 2021 · 36 · 768
8. 10.1177/073168441245674710.1177/0731684412456747 ↗
9. 10.1177/095441001773654610.1177/0954410017736546 ↗
10. 10.1177/073168442090660910.1177/0731684420906609 ↗
11. 10.1177/095441001246198610.1177/0954410012461986 ↗
12. 10.1177/073168441769342910.1177/0731684417693429 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.01810.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.018 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.018 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.02610.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.026 ↗
16. 10.1177/095441001666715010.1177/0954410016667150 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.04010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.040 ↗
18. 10.1177/109963621559028010.1177/1099636215590280 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.024 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.03.00710.1016/j.ast.2017.03.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.03010.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.030 ↗
22. 10.1080/14484846.2020.181727210.1080/14484846.2020.1817272 ↗
23. 10.1007/s40430-021-03078-210.1007/s40430-021-03078-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10686410.1016/j.tws.2020.106864 ↗
25. Shinde B · Advances in Aircraft and Spacecraft Science · 2020 · 7 · 19
26. 10.1177/00219983700040010210.1177/002199837000400102 ↗
27. Sayyad A · Applied and Computational Mechanics · 2019 · 5 · 367
28. 10.1590/1679-7825397210.1590/1679-78253972 ↗
29. 10.1142/S175882512050028310.1142/S1758825120500283 ↗
30. 10.24132/acm.2020.58010.24132/acm.2020.580 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.011 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.052 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.09.01810.1016/j.jsv.2007.09.018 ↗
34. 10.1115/1.300509910.1115/1.3005099 ↗
35. 10.1080/15376494.2018.143278810.1080/15376494.2018.1432788 ↗