journal article·2025-05-01Open access

Acoustic performance of coir fiber-reinforced starch-based bio composites

Hiral H. Parikh, Hiren Rana, Axit Raj, Oluwatoyin Joseph Gbadeyan

Abstract

This article explores the acoustic properties of a bio-composite material derived from coconut plant waste and potato starch material. The material consists of coir fiber as reinforcement and starch as a binding agent, produced using the hot press technique. To improve structural durability, a glass fiber layer was added to one side of the test sample. The study used the impedance tube method to measure the sound absorption coefficient of the newly developed material. It investigated the effects of material composition, thickness, and structural arrangement relative to the sound source on sound absorption. The results reveal that these factors significantly influence sound absorption properties. The fibrous structure achieved the highest noise reduction coefficient when facing the sound source with maximum thickness. The maximum sound absorption coefficient, ranging from 0.35 to 0.4, was observed in the higher frequency range, while the lower frequency range showed more variability in results. Starch-based composites are known for their environment friendly nature and find its applications in various sectors including packaging, consumer goods and automotive too.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Navrachana University

Durban University of Technology

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. UNEP. Chung. 2023. UNEP. UN environment program. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/waste-not-heavy-toll-our-trash
2. 10.1080/15440478.2022.207349510.1080/15440478.2022.2073495 ↗
3. 10.1080/15440478.2023.217263910.1080/15440478.2023.2172639 ↗
4. Aireddy H, Mishra SC. Tribological behavior and mechanical properties of Bio-waste reinforced polymer matrix composites. J Metall Mater Sci 2011; 53(2): 139–152.
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10730510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107305 ↗
6. Khan A, Ahmad MA, Joshi S, et al. Abrasive wear behavior of chemically treated coir fiber-filled epoxy polymer composites. Am J Mech Eng Automation 2014; 1(1): 1.
7. Rao CC, Madhusudan S, Raghavendra G, et al. Investigation in to wear behavior of coir fiber reinforced epoxy composites with the Taguchi method. Int J Eng Res Afr 2012; 2: 2248–9622.
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10730510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107305 ↗
10. 10.1243/13506501JET45510.1243/13506501JET455 ↗
11. 10.1080/23311916.2020.182315910.1080/23311916.2020.1823159 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.wear.2007.10.00610.1016/j.wear.2007.10.006 ↗
13. Mahapatra SS, Chaturvedi V. Modelling and analysis of abrasive wear performance of composites using Taguchi approach. Int J Eng Sci Tech 2009; 1(1): 123–135.
14. 10.15376/biores.9.1.1764-178610.15376/biores.9.1.1764-1786 ↗
15. 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.991212810.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9912128 ↗
16. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181b3512510.1097/JOM.0b013e3181b35125 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.08.01410.1016/j.apacoust.2013.08.014 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.3331210.1002/app.33312 ↗
19. 10.1177/152808371245289910.1177/1528083712452899 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12221-012-0915-010.1007/s12221-012-0915-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.12.00510.1016/j.apacoust.2007.12.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.05610.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.056 ↗
23. 10.1177/002199831351304710.1177/0021998313513047 ↗
24. 10.1080/15440478.2023.220659110.1080/15440478.2023.2206591 ↗
25. 10.3390/textiles101000510.3390/textiles1010005 ↗
26. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100958-1.00003-710.1016/B978-0-08-100958-1.00003-7 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.020 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.064 ↗
29. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1004-1005.56210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1004-1005.562 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.10.00510.1016/j.apacoust.2010.10.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.11.00310.1016/j.apacoust.2010.11.003 ↗
32. 10.1177/073168440936057810.1177/0731684409360578 ↗
33. 10.3844/ajassp.2010.260.26410.3844/ajassp.2010.260.264 ↗
34. 10.1007/s40857-019-00151-810.1007/s40857-019-00151-8 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.08110.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.081 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10849110.1016/j.jobe.2024.108491 ↗
37. 10.1080/00405000.2018.150879810.1080/00405000.2018.1508798 ↗
38. 10.1177/152808372090182310.1177/1528083720901823 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.04610.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.046 ↗
40. 10.1177/152808372095739210.1177/1528083720957392 ↗