journal article·2011-08

Microstructural stability of nanostructured Cu–Nb–W alloys during high-temperature annealing and irradiation

X. Zhang, N.Q. Vo, P. Bellon, R.S. Averback

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The microstructural evolution of dilute Cu-based ternary Cu–Nb alloys during high-temperature annealing was investigated using a combination of transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations. The experiments showed that, during annealing, the Cu 90 Nb 10 binary alloy undergoes extensive coarsening at 600 °C, with precipitate sizes increasing to >40 nm. Additions of just 1.5 at.% W to this alloy, however, dramatically suppresses the growth; the average precipitate size in the ternary alloy now increases to only ∼10 nm at 600 °C, and only to 18 nm at 700 °C. On annealing at still higher temperatures, the precipitate size then, surprisingly, decreases. The precipitate size distribution at the higher temperatures, moreover, is bimodal. It is also observed that irradiation has no effect on the microstructure of the ternary alloys above 600 °C. KMC simulations indicate that the saturation of the average precipitate size, followed by its decrease as the annealing temperature is increased and the development of a bimodal size distribution can be explained by competition between thermodynamic and kinetic effects during precipitation in this ternary alloy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Vo · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 92910.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.07.009 ↗
2. Demkowicz · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 13610210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136102 ↗
3. Demkowicz · Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sec B · 2007 · 261 · 52410.1016/j.nimb.2007.04.110 ↗
4. Hattar · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 54110.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.11.007 ↗
5. Chee · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 408810.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.039 ↗
6. Elagin · Fiz Khim Mekh Mater · 1985 · 60 · 97
7. Fuller · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 541510.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.015 ↗
8. Clouet · Nat Mater · 2006 · 5 · 48210.1038/nmat1652 ↗
9. Ziegler · 1985
10. Mehrer · 1990
11. Abinandanan · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 424310.1016/S1359-6454(98)00107-4 ↗
12. Mao · Nat Mater · 2007 · 6 · 21010.1038/nmat1845 ↗
13. Enrique · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 1464910.1103/PhysRevB.60.14649 ↗
14. Doyama · Acta Metall · 1976 · 24 · 87110.1016/0001-6160(76)90055-9 ↗
15. Bortz · J Comput Phys · 1975 · 17 · 1010.1016/0021-9991(75)90060-1 ↗
16. Soisson · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 76 · 21410210.1103/PhysRevB.76.214102 ↗
17. Roussel · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 6318 · 18411410.1103/PhysRevB.63.184114 ↗
18. Allnatt · 1993
19. Christian · 2002
20. Ostwald · Z Phys. Chem. · 1897 · 22 · 28910.1515/zpch-1897-2233 ↗
21. Threlfall · Org Process Res Dev · 2003 · 7 · 101710.1021/op030026l ↗
22. Zimmermann · Z Phys Chem · 2010 · 224 · 92910.1524/zpch.2010.6134 ↗
23. Williams · Met Sci J · 1975 · 9 · 52910.1179/030634575790445143 ↗
24. Nicolas · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 607710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00429-4 ↗
25. Marlaud · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 481410.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.017 ↗
26. Gendt · Defect Diffusion Forum · 2001 · 194–199 · 177910.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.194-199.1779 ↗
27. Mulholland · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 188110.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.054 ↗
28. Hin · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 553510.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.044 ↗
29. Hin · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 565310.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.045 ↗
30. Odette · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗