journal article·2013-11

Nonstoichiometry and relative stabilities of Y2Ti2O7 polar surfaces: A density functional theory prediction

Litong Yang, Yong Jiang, G. Robert Odette, Wenchong Zhou, Zuming Liu, Yong Liu

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Density functional theory calculations were carried out to predict the surface structures and relative stabilities of (1 0 0) and (1 1 0) polar surfaces of a complex metal oxide, Y 2 Ti 2 O 7 . Based on a thermodynamic defect model, surface stabilities were evaluated as a direct function of stoichiometry and environmental factors, i.e. oxygen partial pressure and temperature. Calculations show that, as the oxygen partial pressure increases, the most stable termination of the (1 1 0) changes from Y/Ti-rich to O-rich. For the (1 0 0) surfaces, the most stable termination changes from Y/Ti-rich to stoichiometric, and then to O-rich, with increasing oxygen partial pressure. All variants of the (1 1 0) surfaces were found to be more stable than (1 0 0) surfaces. In particular, non-stoichiometric (1 1 0) surfaces are always more stable than their stoichiometric counterparts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Odette · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗
2. Barnard · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 93510.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.011 ↗
3. Alinger · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 39210.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.025 ↗
4. Ohnuma · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 557110.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.054 ↗
5. Oksiuta · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 393 · 11410.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.05.013 ↗
6. Etienne · Mater Sci Technol · 2011 · 27 · 72410.1179/1743284710Y.0000000038 ↗
7. Larson · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 35910.1016/S1359-6462(00)00593-5 ↗
8. Miller · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 329 · 33810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.085 ↗
9. Miller · Intermetallics · 2005 · 13 · 38710.1016/j.intermet.2004.07.036 ↗
10. Miller · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2003 · 353 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00680-9 ↗
11. Miller · J Nucl Mater · 2006 · 351 · 26110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.004 ↗
12. Cunningham N, Stergar E, Marquis E, Etaine A, Odette GR. In: Fusion materials semiannual progress, report, DOE/ER-0313/50; 2011.
13. Wu Y, Haney E, Odette GR, Cunningham N. In: Fusion materials semiannual progress, report, DOE/ER-0313/50; 2011.
14. Odette · JOM · 2010 · 62 · 8410.1007/s11837-010-0144-1 ↗
15. Jiang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 1536 · 1543
16. Klimiankou · Micron · 2005 · 36 · 110.1016/j.micron.2004.08.001 ↗
17. Yamashita · Philos Mag Lett · 2004 · 84 · 52510.1080/09500830412331303609 ↗
18. Yamashita · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 377 · 381
19. Kishimoto · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 533 · 386
20. Ribis · Acta Mater · 2012 · 238 · 357
21. Wu · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 345610.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.012 ↗
22. Ciston J, Wu Y, Odette GR, Hosemann P. In: Fusion materials semiannual progress, report, DOE-ER-0313/51; 2012.
23. Stan · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A · 2013 · 44 · 450510.1007/s11661-013-1827-3 ↗
24. Odette · JOM · 2010 · 62 · 8410.1007/s11837-010-0144-1 ↗
25. Siegel · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 67 · 09210510.1103/PhysRevB.67.092105 ↗
26. Jiang · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 14191810.1063/1.2907339 ↗
27. Inter
28. Jiang · J Mater Sci · 2009 · 44 · 173410.1007/s10853-008-3084-1 ↗
29. Jiang · Int J Mater Res · 2010 · 101 · 810.3139/146.110254 ↗
30. Biswasa · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 618710.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.036 ↗
31. Lan · Phys Chem Chem Phys · 2012 · 14 · 1117810.1039/c2cp41079f ↗
32. VASP Guide. .
33. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
34. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
35. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
36. Terkia · Physica B · 2007 · 392 · 34110.1016/j.physb.2006.11.047 ↗
37. Subramanian · Prog Solid State Chem · 1983 · 15 · 5510.1016/0079-6786(83)90001-8 ↗
38. Glerup · J Solid State Chem · 2001 · 160 · 2510.1006/jssc.2000.9142 ↗
39. Haile · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 1990 · 166 · 8110.1557/PROC-166-81 ↗
40. He · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 54810.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.11.042 ↗
41. Bertaut · Compt Rend · 1958 · 246 · 3447
42. Tasker · J Phys C · 1979 · 12 · 497710.1088/0022-3719/12/22/036 ↗
43. Bottin · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 68 · 03541810.1103/PhysRevB.68.035418 ↗
44. Noguera · J Phys: Condens Matter · 2000 · 12 · R367
45. Pojani · Surf Sci · 1999 · 442 · 17910.1016/S0039-6028(99)00911-5 ↗
46. Sayle · Surf Sci · 1994 · 316 · 32910.1016/0039-6028(94)91225-4 ↗
47. Jiang · J Chem Phys · 2005 · 123 · 06470110.1063/1.1949189 ↗
48. J. W. Cahn, in: W. C. Johnson and J. M. Blakely (eds.), Interfacial Segregation. Metals Park, OH: American Society for Metals, 1977, pp. 3–23.
49. 1999
50. Terki · Physica B · 2007 · 392 · 34110.1016/j.physb.2006.11.047 ↗