journal article·2015-03

Thermomechanical properties of rare-earth-doped AlN for laser gain media: The role of grain boundaries and grain size

A.T. Wieg, Y. Kodera, Z. Wang, C. Dames, J.E. Garay

Acta Materialia· Volume 86
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The low thermal conductivity and poor fracture toughness of traditional laser gain media (rare-earth-doped single crystals) limits the overall power deliverable from a laser system. We present an investigation of the thermomechanical properties of a promising laser gain candidate, Tb-doped aluminum nitride (Tb:AlN). We pay special attention to the effect of the average grain size and the dopant segregation at the grain boundaries on the relevant properties: Vickers hardness, fracture toughness and thermal conductivity. We find that all properties are affected by grain boundaries and/or dopant segregation. However, the thermal conductivity is significantly more affected than the mechanical properties and therefore dominates the thermal shock figure of merit, R s . We obtained a thermal shock figure of merit in Tb:AlN more than 60 times that of the state-of-the-art laser gain material Nd:YAG.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies · Thermal properties of materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Koechner · 2006
2. Ikesue · Nat. Photonics · 2008 · 2 · 72110.1038/nphoton.2008.243 ↗
3. Ikesue · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2006 · 36 · 39710.1146/annurev.matsci.36.011205.152926 ↗
4. Kodera · Scr. Mater. · 2013 · 69 · 14910.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.02.013 ↗
5. An · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2011 · 31 · 159710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.03.014 ↗
6. Zhang · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2011 · 94 · 320610.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04789.x ↗
7. Morales · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 09311010.1063/1.3583654 ↗
8. Penilla · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2012 · 177 · 117210.1016/j.mseb.2012.05.026 ↗
9. Castillo-Vega · Opt. Mater. Express · 2012 · 2 · 141610.1364/OME.2.001416 ↗
10. Wieg · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 11190310.1063/1.4751856 ↗
11. Penilla · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2013 · 23 · 603610.1002/adfm.201300906 ↗
12. Terao · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2002 · 22 · 105110.1016/S0955-2219(01)00422-8 ↗
13. Yu · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2002 · 22 · 24710.1016/S0955-2219(01)00252-7 ↗
14. Niihara · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1982 · 1 · 1310.1007/BF00724706 ↗
15. Cahill · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1990 · 61 · 80210.1063/1.1141498 ↗
16. Slack · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1987 · 48 · 64110.1016/0022-3697(87)90153-3 ↗
17. Wang · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 220610.1021/nl1045395 ↗
18. Watari · J. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 17 · 294010.1557/JMR.2002.0426 ↗
19. Gerlich · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1986 · 47 · 43710.1016/0022-3697(86)90039-9 ↗
20. Mezeix · Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. · 2006 · 3 · 16610.1111/j.1744-7402.2006.02068.x ↗
21. Hasselman · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1969 · 52 · 60010.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb15848.x ↗
22. Faber · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1969 · 64 · 29610.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb09606.x ↗