Digital image correlation technique for failure and crack propagation of fibre-reinforced polymer composites – A review
Source abstract
Abstract
Digital image correlation (DIC) is a powerful technique for determining material deformation and damage and currently is viewed as a potential method to study failure and crack propagation in advanced composite materials. Case studies in concrete, epoxy adhesives, and carbon/epoxy laminates demonstrate the effectiveness of the DIC technique in visualizing crack propagation. This review highlights the applications, challenges, and implementation of the DIC technique in the failure and crack propagation of fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. The important factors such as field of view, speckle pattern, and algorithm choice are discussed while emphasizing the need for careful selection and calibration. The review concludes by highlighting the significance of crack propagation studies for composite behaviour and the role of DIC in calibrating and validating models of composite failure analysis. Future research directions include investigating mixed-mode delamination, improving calibration procedures, assessing DIC accuracy for large deformations, and comparing different DIC algorithms, which are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia
Universität der Bundeswehr München
University of Southampton Malaysia
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Funding
Universität der Bundeswehr München · UTMFR · FRGS
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/polym1319340010.3390/polym13193400 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70235-210.1016/S1369-7021(10)70235-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10908210.1016/j.measurement.2021.109082 ↗
4. 10.3390/ICEM18-053810.3390/ICEM18-0538 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-0-387-92897-510.1007/978-0-387-92897-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11141810.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111418 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.06410.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.064 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.aej.2017.01.02010.1016/j.aej.2017.01.020 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.07.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2004.07.007 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.oceram.2023.10036610.1016/j.oceram.2023.100366 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10287510.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102875 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.01.06110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.01.061 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10690110.1016/j.ultras.2022.106901 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11214710.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112147 ↗
15. 10.1063/5.003404910.1063/5.0034049 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10566110.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105661 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.09.02210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.09.022 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11444710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114447 ↗
19. 10.1051/epjconf/20212500102110.1051/epjconf/202125001021 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.10334310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103343 ↗
21. 10.1111/jace.1796110.1111/jace.17961 ↗
22. 10.1155/2019/298350610.1155/2019/2983506 ↗
23. 10.3390/met1310179110.3390/met13101791 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.08510.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.085 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10795910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107959 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.02210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.022 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10277710.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102777 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10716610.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107166 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.11.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.11.015 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10630410.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106304 ↗
31. 10.1111/ffe.1321010.1111/ffe.13210 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10716110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107161 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10740810.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107408 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10300310.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103003 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10867410.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108674 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10709710.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107097 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.03.00110.1016/j.tafmec.2019.03.001 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10915710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109157 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10273710.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102737 ↗
40. 10.21205/deufmd.201921620510.21205/deufmd.2019216205 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.07010.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.070 ↗
42. Callister JWD, Rethwisch DG. Materials science and engineering. Paris: Hachette Livre - Département Pratique, 2020.
43. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0215-910.1007/978-1-4615-0215-9 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jsg.2014.02.00510.1016/j.jsg.2014.02.005 ↗
45. 10.3139/146.11038210.3139/146.110382 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.023 ↗
47. 10.1098/rsta.2013.002310.1098/rsta.2013.0023 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10746810.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107468 ↗
49. 10.3390/ma1319441510.3390/ma13194415 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.05.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.05.004 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12240110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122401 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10677810.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106778 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.08.04910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.08.049 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.00810.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.008 ↗
55. 10.1080/10589759.2018.142832210.1080/10589759.2018.1428322 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11092610.1016/j.measurement.2022.110926 ↗
57. Chris Roshan C Vasanth Ram H Solomon J. Non-destructive testing by liquid penetrant testing and ultrasonic testing-A review https://www.IJARIIT.com 2019.
58. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.01810.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.018 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.33910.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.339 ↗
60. 10.4271/2012-01-018310.4271/2012-01-0183 ↗
61. 10.1177/168781402091376110.1177/1687814020913761 ↗
62. 10.1007/s11340-017-0283-110.1007/s11340-017-0283-1 ↗
63. 10.1007/s11340-016-0233-310.1007/s11340-016-0233-3 ↗
64. 10.1088/1361-6501/aac55b10.1088/1361-6501/aac55b ↗
65. 10.26649/musci.2019.05210.26649/musci.2019.052 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10279810.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102798 ↗
67. Backers T. Fracture toughness determination and micromechanics of rock under mode I and mode II loading. Published online 2004. DOI: 10.2312/GFZ.b103-0505510.2312/GFZ.b103-05055 ↗
68. 10.1177/10567895960050040310.1177/105678959600500403 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12708310.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127083 ↗
70. 10.5923/j.cmaterials.20190901.0210.5923/j.cmaterials.20190901.02 ↗
71. 10.1029/2022jb02492010.1029/2022jb024920 ↗
72. 10.1007/s00603-015-0767-110.1007/s00603-015-0767-1 ↗
73. Nairn JA. Matrix microcracking in composites. Polymer Matrix Composites 2000; 2: 403–432.
74. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.07.00710.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.07.007 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11223110.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112231 ↗
76. 10.1115/1.404718610.1115/1.4047186 ↗
77. 10.3390/polym1507161110.3390/polym15071611 ↗
78. 10.2514/3.1107210.2514/3.11072 ↗
79. 10.1007/s12206-021-0527-y10.1007/s12206-021-0527-y ↗
80. 10.3390/ma1412334810.3390/ma14123348 ↗
81. 10.3390/app812244010.3390/app8122440 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11499810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114998 ↗
83. 10.1016/S0142-1123(96)00068-010.1016/S0142-1123(96)00068-0 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.09.00610.1016/j.tafmec.2018.09.006 ↗
85. 10.1080/15583724.2019.167770810.1080/15583724.2019.1677708 ↗
86. 10.1177/002199831769541410.1177/0021998317695414 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.009 ↗
88. 10.1080/13588265.2017.130878410.1080/13588265.2017.1308784 ↗
89. 10.1177/0021998321103163610.1177/00219983211031636 ↗
90. 10.1106/FELT-6YGW-ABYA-0NQ410.1106/FELT-6YGW-ABYA-0NQ4 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.07.00410.1016/j.tafmec.2017.07.004 ↗
92. Jamali J Mohammadzaheri M Sharifi P et al. Polymers and polymer composites mixed mode fracture testing. In: Proceedings of 2016 7th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering ICMAE 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2016 pp. 73–77. DOI: 10.1109/ICMAE.2016.7549511.10.1109/ICMAE.2016.7549511 ↗
93. 10.1177/109963621877796410.1177/1099636218777964 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10268210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102682 ↗
95. 10.1002/pc.2601510.1002/pc.26015 ↗
96. Borotto M. Bridging effects on mixed mode delamination: experiments and numerical simulation 2016. DOI: 10.5075/epfl-thesis-7056.10.5075/epfl-thesis-7056 ↗
97. 10.2514/3.2520410.2514/3.25204 ↗
98. Reeder JR. Refinements to the mixed-mode bending test for delamination toughness. J Compos Technol Res 2000: 25(4): 11949.
99. 10.1520/CTR10961J10.1520/CTR10961J ↗
100. Galal GM Allegri G Hallett SR. Predicting the through-thickness enhancement of z-pinned composite laminates high-fidelity modelling of defects generated during AFP process view project aerospace design view project the 19 TH international conference on composite materials 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295912731