Phase field crystal model of solute drag
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The atomic scale interaction of solute with a migrating grain boundary has been studied using a binary phase field crystal (PFC) model. This model bridges between atomistic and continuum simulation techniques as it operates on diffusive timescales but at atomistic length scales. For this study, a two-dimensional channel containing two grains separated by a flat grain boundary has been constructed that allows for a channel length on the order of one micrometer. A new formalism has been developed to allow for the application of an external driving pressure for the growth of one grain. These simulations account for solute/grain boundary interactions, resulting in a solute drag effect on the grain boundary motion. The PFC simulations show good agreement with classical solute drag theory, though deviations due to the atomic scale nature of the interface exist.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Gottstein · J Phys IV · 1995 · 5 · C3
2. Molodov · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 55310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00277-2 ↗
3. Dillon · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 137410.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.042 ↗
4. Aleksandrov · Metal Sci Heat Treat · 2005 · 47 · 49710.1007/s11041-006-0019-9 ↗
5. Hutchinson · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 63510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.036 ↗
6. Sinclair · Metall Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38A · 82110.1007/s11661-007-9106-9 ↗
7. Cahn · Acta Metall · 1962 · 10 · 78910.1016/0001-6160(62)90092-5 ↗
8. Maruyama · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 353 · 12610.1016/S0921-5093(02)00678-0 ↗
9. Lücke K, Stüwe HP. Recovery and recrystallization of metals. New York: Interscience Publishers; 1963.
10. Hillert · Acta Mater · 1976 · 24 · 73110.1016/0001-6160(76)90108-5 ↗
11. Ofori-Opoku · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 215510.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.001 ↗
12. Moelans · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 117510.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.045 ↗
13. Steinbach · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 07300110.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 ↗
14. Grönhagen · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 95510.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.017 ↗
15. Heo · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 780010.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.045 ↗
16. Mendelev · Philos Mag A · 2001 · 81 · 224310.1080/01418610108217146 ↗
17. Holm · Science · 2010 · 328 · 113810.1126/science.1187833 ↗
18. Yang · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 107 · 02550510.1103/PhysRevLett.107.025505 ↗
19. Elder · Phys Rev Lett · 2002 · 88 · 24570110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.245701 ↗
20. Elder · Phys Rev E · 2004 · 70 · 05160510.1103/PhysRevE.70.051605 ↗
21. Greenwood · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 105 · 04570210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.045702 ↗
22. Greenwood · Phys Rev E · 2011 · 83 · 03160110.1103/PhysRevE.83.031601 ↗
23. Greenwood · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 06410410.1103/PhysRevB.84.064104 ↗
24. Berry · Phys Rev E · 2006 · 73 · 03160910.1103/PhysRevE.73.031609 ↗
25. Stefanovic · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 96 · 22510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.225504 ↗
26. Elder · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 06410710.1103/PhysRevB.75.064107 ↗
27. Hillert · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 528910.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.032 ↗
28. Elder · Phys Rev E · 2010 · 81 · 01160210.1103/PhysRevE.81.011602 ↗