Intra-variant substructure in Ni–Mn–Ga martensite: Conjugation boundaries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The microstructure of a Ni–Mn–Ga alloy in the martensitic phase was investigated using transmission electron microscopy. Inter-variant twin boundaries were observed separating non-modulated tetragonal martensite variants. In addition, intra-variant boundary structures, referred to here as “conjugation boundaries”, were also observed. We propose that conjugation boundaries originate at the transformation interface between austenite and a nascent martensite variant. In the alloy studied, deformation twinning was observed, consistent with being the mode of lattice-invariant deformation, and this can occur on either of two crystallographically equivalent conjugate { 1 0 1 } 〈 1 0 1 ¯ 〉 twinning systems: conjugation boundaries separate regions within a single variant in which the active modes were distinct. The defect structure of conjugation boundaries and the low-angle of misorientation across them are revealed in detail using high-resolution microscopy. We anticipate that the mobility of such boundaries is lower than that of inter-variant boundaries, and is therefore likely to significantly affect the kinetics of deformation in the martensitic phase.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Ullakko · Appl Phys Lett · 1996 · 69 · 196610.1063/1.117637 ↗
2. Soderberg · Smart Mater Struct · 2005 · 14 · S22310.1088/0964-1726/14/5/009 ↗
3. Chmielus · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 395210.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.031 ↗
4. Chmielus · Eur Phys J-Spec Top · 2008 · 158 · 7910.1140/epjst/e2008-00657-3 ↗
5. Heczko · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 62210.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.007 ↗
6. Straka · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 10910.1063/1.3552292 ↗
7. Straka · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 9610.1063/1.3373608 ↗
8. Webster · Philos Mag B – Phys Condens Matter Stat Mech Electron Opt Magn Prop · 1984 · 49 · 295
9. Bhattacharya · 2003
10. International tables for crystallography. Chester: International Union of Crystallography; 2006.
11. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
12. Pond · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 397610.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.045 ↗
13. Zarubova · Funct Mater Lett · 2012 · 510.1142/S1793604712500063 ↗
14. Zarubova · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 529010.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.020 ↗
15. Kellis · J Cryst Growth · 2012 · 359 · 6410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.08.014 ↗
16. Kovarik · Prog Mater Sci · 2009 · 54 · 83910.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.010 ↗
17. Pond · J Microsc – Oxford · 1979 · 116 · 10510.1111/j.1365-2818.1979.tb00194.x ↗
18. Pond · Interface Sci · 1995 · 2 · 29910.1007/BF00222621 ↗
19. Cong · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 473110.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.045 ↗
20. Wayman · 1964
21. Romanov · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 45 · 32510.1016/S1359-6462(01)01035-1 ↗
22. Hirth · Philos Mag · 2010 · 90 · 312910.1080/14786435.2010.481269 ↗
23. Chernenko · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 5310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00320-2 ↗
24. Stuhr · J Phys-Condens Matter · 2000 · 12 · 754110.1088/0953-8984/12/34/301 ↗
25. Pond · 2007 · vol. 74 · 225
26. Sutton · 1995
27. Romanov · 1992 · vol. 9
28. Romanov · Prog Mater Sci · 2009 · 54 · 74010.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.002 ↗
29. Müllner · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 524210.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.048 ↗
30. Romanov · Phys Stat Solidi a – Appl Res · 1999 · 172 · 22510.1002/(SICI)1521-396X(199903)172:1<225::AID-PSSA225>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
31. Romanov · J Appl Phys · 1998 · 83 · 275410.1063/1.366636 ↗
32. Speck · J Appl Phys · 1995 · 78 · 169610.1063/1.360267 ↗
33. Straka · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 67 · 2510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.03.012 ↗