journal article·2008-07

Thermoeconomic modeling and parametric study of hybrid SOFC–gas turbine–steam turbine power plants ranging from 1.5 to 10MWe

Alexandros Arsalis

Journal of Power Sources· Volume 181· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Detailed thermodynamic, kinetic, geometric, and cost models are developed, implemented, and validated for the synthesis/design and operational analysis of hybrid SOFC-gas turbine-steam turbine systems ranging in size from 1.5 to 10 MWe. The fuel cell model used in this research work is based on a tubular Siemens-Westinghouse-type SOFC, which is integrated with a gas turbine and a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) integrated in turn with a steam turbine cycle. The current work considers the possible benefits of using the exhaust gases in a HRSG in order to produce steam which drives a steam turbine for additional power output. Four different steam turbine cycles are considered in this research work: a single-pressure, a dual-pressure, a triple pressure, and a triple pressure with reheat. The models have been developed to function both at design (full load) and off-design (partial load) conditions. In addition, different solid oxide fuel cell sizes are examined to assure a proper selection of SOFC size based on efficiency or cost. The thermoeconomic analysis includes cost functions developed specifically for the different system and component sizes (capacities) analyzed. A parametric study is used to determine the most viable system/component syntheses/designs based on maximizing total system efficiency or minimizing total system life cycle cost.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Ionic liquids properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Larminie · 2003
2. Fuel Cell Handbook, seventh ed., Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, West Virginia, November, 2004.
3. Siemens Power Generation, http://www.powergeneration.siemens.com, 2007.
4. Calise · 2005
5. Calise · 2004
6. Calise · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 159 · 116910.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.11.108 ↗
7. Singhal · 2003
8. Benjamin · 1995
9. Chan · J. Power Sources · 2002 · 103 · 18810.1016/S0378-7753(01)00842-4 ↗
10. S. Campanari, Power Plants Based on Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Combined With Gas Turbine Cycles, PhD Dissertation, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy, 1998.
11. N. Georgopoulos, Application of a Decomposition Strategy to the Optimal Synthesis/Design and Operation of a Fuel Cell Based Total Energy System, M.S. Thesis, advisor: M.R. von Spakovsky, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA, 2002.10.1115/IMECE2002-33320 ↗
12. B. Oyarzabal, Application of a Decomposition Strategy to the Optimal Synthesis/Design of a Fuel Cell Sub-system, M.S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, advisor: M.R. von Spakovsky, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA, 2001.
13. Dunbar · Energy: Int. J. · 1991 · 16 · 125910.1016/0360-5442(91)90155-F ↗
14. Campanari · J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power · 2000 · 122 · 23910.1115/1.483201 ↗
15. Costamagna · J. Power Sources · 2001 · 96 · 35210.1016/S0378-7753(00)00668-6 ↗
16. Campanari · J. Power Sources · 2002 · 112 · 27310.1016/S0378-7753(02)00395-6 ↗
17. S. Pelster, Environomic Modeling & Optimization of Advanced Combined Cycle Cogeneration Power Plants Including CO2 Separation Options, Doctoral Thesis, advisors: M.R. von Spakovsky, D. Favrat, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1998.
18. Kehlhofer · 1999
19. Kakaç · 2002
20. A. Arsalis, Thermoeconomic Modeling and Parametric Study of Hybrid Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Gas Turbine-Steam Turbine Power Plants Ranging from 1.5MWe to 10MWe, M.S. Thesis, advisor: M.R. von Spakovsky, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 2007.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.104 ↗
21. Salisbury · 1974
22. Skrotzki · 1960
23. Potter · 1959
24. Traverso · 2004
25. Chiesa · 2003
26. Boehm · 1987
27. Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index, Chemical Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006.
28. Traverso · 2006
29. Frangopoulos · Int. J. Energy Environ. Econ. · 1991 · 1 · 275
30. Peters · 2003
31. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Natural Gas Prices, http://www.eia.doe.gov, 2006.
32. Singhal · 1997
33. D. Rancruel, Optimization of Solid-Oxide Fuel Cell Balance-of-Plant System, PhD Dissertation, advisor: M.R. von Spakovsky, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA, 2005.
34. T.P. Chen, J.D. Wright, K. Krist, NETL Proceedings of the Fuel Cells ’97 Review Meeting, GRI study, 1997.