Switching to a U.S. hydrogen fuel cell vehicle fleet: The resultant change in emissions, energy use, and greenhouse gases
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examines the potential change in primary emissions and energy use from replacing the current U.S. fleet of fossil-fuel on-road vehicles (FFOV) with hybrid electric fossil fuel vehicles or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCV). Emissions and energy usage are analyzed for three different HFCV scenarios, with hydrogen produced from: (1) steam reforming of natural gas, (2) electrolysis powered by wind energy, and (3) coal gasification. With the U.S. EPA’s National Emission Inventory as the baseline, other emission inventories are created using a life cycle assessment (LCA) of alternative fuel supply chains. For a range of reasonable HFCV efficiencies and methods of producing hydrogen, we find that the replacement of FFOV with HFCV significantly reduces emission associated with air pollution, compared even with a switch to hybrids. All HFCV scenarios decrease net air pollution emission, including nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, ammonia, and carbon monoxide. These reductions are achieved with hydrogen production from either a fossil fuel source such as natural gas or a renewable source such as wind. Furthermore, replacing FFOV with hybrids or HFCV with hydrogen derived from natural gas, wind or coal may reduce the global warming impact of greenhouse gases and particles (measured in carbon dioxide equivalent emission) by 6, 14, 23, and 1%, respectively. Finally, even if HFCV are fueled by a fossil fuel such as natural gas, if no carbon is sequestered during hydrogen production, and 1% of methane in the feedstock gas is leaked to the environment, natural gas HFCV still may achieve a significant reduction in greenhouse gas and air pollution emission over FFOV. © 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Vehicle emissions and performance · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (94)
Show source-provided references
1. Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles10.1126/science.1109157 ↗
2. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/1999inventory.html.
3. Affordable hydrogen supply pathways for fuel cell vehicles10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00102-X ↗
4. GATOR-GCMM: a global through urban scale air pollution and weather forecast model. Part 1: Model design and treatment of subgrid soil, vegetation, roads, rooftops, water, sea ice, and snow10.1029/2000JD900560 ↗
5. GATOR-GCMM: Part 2: A study of day- and nighttime ozone layers aloft, ozone in national parks, and weather during the SARMAP field campaign10.1029/2000JD900559 ↗
6. D.B. Myers, G.D. Ariff, B.D. James, R.C. Kuhn, Hydrogen from renewable energy sources: pathway to 10 quads for transportation uses in 2030 to 2050, The Hydrogen Program Office, Office of Power Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Grant No. DE-FG01-99EE35099, 2003.
7. S. Kartha, Wind and PV electrolysis, Renewable hydrogen forum: a summary of expert opinion and policy recommendations, National Press Club, Washington, DC, 1 October 2003. http://www.ases.org/hydrogen_forum03/Forum_report_c_9_24_03.pdf.
8. Renewable hydrogen and its role for vehicle refueling
9. California fuel cell partnership: codes, standards and regulations. http://www.fuelcellpartnership.org/resource-otherlinks.htm.
10. J.B. Heywood, M.A. Weiss, A. Schafer, S.A. Bassene, V.K. Natarajan, The performance of future ICE and fuel cell powered vehicles and their potential fleet impact, SAE paper series, Paper number 04P-254, 2004.10.4271/2004-01-1011 ↗
11. The hydrogen backlash, Science, vol. 305, 2004, p. 961.10.1126/science.305.5686.958 ↗
12. I. Kuhn, S. Thomas, F. Lomax, B. James, W. Colella, Fuel processing systems for fuel cell vehicles, Report for the U.S. Department of Energy, 1997.
13. B. James, F. Lomax, S. Thomas, W. Colella, PEM fuel cell power system cost estimates: sulfur-free gasoline partial oxidation and compressed direct hydrogen, Report for the U.S. Department of Energy, 1997.
14. Concawe and the European Council for Automotive R&D, Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context, Well-to-wheels Report, version lb, 2004. http://ies.jrc.cec.eu.int/Download/eh.
15. F. Raymond, Director, BMW Group Research and Technology of Munich Germany, Hydrogen Research at the BMW Group – Our Vision of a Sustainable Individual Mobility, Mechanical Engineering Seminar Series, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 25 April 2005.
16. M.A. Weiss, J.B. Heywood, E. Drake, A. Schafer, F. AuYeung, On the road in 2020: a life-cycle analysis of new automobile technologies, Energy Laboratory Report no. MIT EL-00-003, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, October 2000. http://Afee.mit.edu/publications/reports.
17. M.A. Weiss, J.B. Heywood, A. Schafer, V.K. Natarajan, Comparative assessment of fuel cell cars, MIT LFEE 2003–2001 RP, February 2003. http://lfee.mit.edu/publications/reports.
18. Service · Science · 2004 · 205 · 95810.1126/science.305.5686.958 ↗
19. T.K. Tromp, R.-L. Shia, M. Allen, J.M. Eiler, Y.L. Yung, Potential environmental impact of a hydrogen economy on the stratosphere, Science (300) (2003) 1740–1742.10.1126/science.1085169 ↗
20. Air pollution and climate-forcing impacts of a global hydrogen economy10.1126/science.1089527 ↗
21. R. O’Hare, S.W. Cha, W.G. Colella, F.B. Prinz, Fuel Cell Fundamentals, Chapter 11, September 2005, ISBN: 0471741485.
22. Goldratt · 1992
23. D.H. Barnes, S.C. Wofsy, B.P. Fehlau, E.W. Gottlieb, J.W. Elkins, G.S. Dutton, P.C. Novelli, Hydrogen in the atmosphere: observations above a forest canopy in a polluted environment, J. Geophys. Res. 108 (D6) (2003) 4197, doi: 10.1029/2001JD001199.10.1029/2001JD001199 ↗
24. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/1999inventory.html.
25. Light Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 Through 2004, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Washington, DC, April 2004, EPA420-S-04-002.
26. http://www.epa.gov/air/data.
27. S. Gino, B. Dwight, A Contribution to Understanding Automotive Fuel Economy and Its Limits, SAE Technical Paper Series, Warrendale, PA, 2003, 2003-01-2070, p. 24.
28. P.L. Spath, M.K. Mann, Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production via Natural Gas Steam Reforming, National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) Technical Report, NREL, Bolder, CO, 2001.10.2172/764485 ↗
29. Toyota FCHV—The First Step Toward The Hydrogen Society of Tomorrow, Toyota Special Report, p. 2. http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/special/fchv/fchv_1.html.
30. P.J. Meier, G.L. Kulcinski, Life-Cycle Energy Cost and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Gas Turbine Power, Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, December 2000.
31. The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs, The National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2004, p. 3-3.
32. http://www.arb.ca.gov.
33. Harmonic average of the mileage of all vehicles in the EPA's Mobile Database for 1999.
34. R. Venki, Hydrogen Production and Supply Infrastructure for Transportation, Workshop Proceedings: The 10-50 Solution: Technologies and Policies for a Low-Carbon Future, The Pew Center on Global Climate Change and the National Commission on Energy Policy, 2004.
35. Heywood · 1988
36. Ford Motor Company, shared with Directed Technologies Inc., 2004.
37. Personal Communication between W. Colella and S. Thomas, President, H2Gen Innovations, July, 2004.
38. Toyota FCHV—The First Step Toward The Hydrogen Society of Tomorrow, Toyota Special Report, p. 2. http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/special/fchv/fchv_1.html.
39. E. Villanueva, Senior Engineer, Honda R&D Americas Inc., Presentation at Honda R&D, Torrance, CA, 22 March 2005.
40. T. Kawanabe, Managing Director, Honda R&D Co. Ltd., Presentation at EVS-20, Long Beach, 19 November 2003.
41. Ford Motor Company, shared with Directed Technologies Inc., 2004.
42. Ballard Transportation Products Xcellsis™ HY-80 Light Duty Fuel Cell Engine, Ballard Power Corporation, Vancouver, BC, 2004. http://www.ballard.com/pdfs/XCS-HY-80_Trans.pdf.
43. Ballard Transportation Products A 600V300 MS High Power Electric Drive System, Ballard Power Corporation, Vancouver, BC, 2004. http://www.ballard.com/pdfs/ballardedpc600v300ms.pdf.
44. Toyota FCHV—The First Step Toward The Hydrogen Society of Tomorrow, Toyota Special Report, p. 2. http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/special/fchv/fchv_1.html.
45. Email communications between W. Colella and B. Knight, Vice President, Honda R&D Americas Inc., 25 March 2005 and 11 April 2005.
46. http://world.honda.com/FuelCell/.
47. The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs, The National Research Council, 2004, Washington, DC, p. 3.
48. T. Sandy, Comparison of Natural Gas Vehicles and Hydrogen-Powered Fuel Cell Vehicles, Directed Technologies, 2003.
49. Toyota FCHV—The First Step Toward The Hydrogen Society of Tomorrow, Toyota Special Report, p. 2. http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/special/fchv/fchv_1.html.
50. Fuel choices for fuel cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emissions impacts10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00447-0 ↗
51. A.B. Lovins, E.K. Datta, O.-E. Bustnes, J.G. Koomey, N.J. Glasgow, Winning the Oil Endgame, Innovation for Profits, Jobs, and Security, Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, Colorado, 2004, p. 65, (Figure 20).
52. A.B. Lovins, M.M. Brylawski, D.R. Cramer, T.C. Moore, Hypercars: Materials, Manufacturing, and Policy Implications, The Hypercar Center at the Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, Colorado, 1997.
53. On-board hydrogen storage for fuel cell vehicle10.1115/IECEC2001-RE-03 ↗
54. Advanced hydrogen fuel systems for fuel cell vehicles
55. General Motors Fuel Cell Vehicle website: http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/adv_tech/400_fcv/fc_milestones.html.
56. Toyota Motor Corporation News Release, May 16, 2005. http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/news/05/0516.html.
57. S. Aceves, S. Perfect, A. Weisberg, Optimum Utilization of Available Space in a Vehicle through Conformable Hydrogen Tanks, LLNL, DOE Hydrogen Program FY2004 Progress Report, pp. 186–189.
58. M.A. Delucchi, A Lifecycle Emissions Model (LEM): Lifecycle Emissions from Transportation Fuels, Motor Vehicles, Transportation Modes, Electricity Use, Heating and Cooking Fuels and Materials, Institute for Transportation Studies, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, 2003, UCD-ITS-RR-03-17, Main Report, p. 88.
59. Requirements for advanced mobile storage systems10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00120-1 ↗
60. Onboard storage alternatives for hydrogen vehicles10.1021/ef9700947 ↗
61. Bossel · Energy and the Hydrogen Economy · 2003 · 11
62. M.A. Zittel, Molecular Hydrogen and Water Vapor Emission in a Global Hydrogen Energy Economy, Proceedings of the 11th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, T.N. Veziroglu, C.J. Winter, J.P. Baselt, G. Kreysa (Eds.), Schon and Wetzel, Frankfurt, Germany, 1996. www.hydrogen.org/knowledge/vapour.htm.
63. M.E. Richards, C. Blazek, C. Webster, J. Wong, L. Gambone, Compressed Natural Gas Storage Optimization for Natural Gas Vehicles, Final Report, GRI-96/0364, Gas Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois, November, 1996.
64. Sherif · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 1997 · 22 · 68310.1016/S0360-3199(96)00201-7 ↗
65. A.B. Lovins, Twenty Myths About Hydrogen #E03-05, Rocky Mountain Institute, September 2003.
66. eGrid: The Comprehensive Environmental Database on the Electric Power Industry, United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Spring 2003.
67. Original Business Plan, H2Gen Innovations, Alexandria, VA, USA, 22304-4806, 2000. www.h2gen.com.
68. Directed Technologies, Cost and Performance Comparison of Stationary Hydrogen Fueling Appliances, Report for the Hydrogen Program of the Office of the Department of Energy, April 2002.
69. Implications of electricity liberalization for combined heat and power (CHP) fuel cell systems (FCSs): a case study of the United Kingdom10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01062-X ↗
70. Evaluation of the financial and environmental feasibility of a network of distributed 200kWe cogenerative fuel cell systems on the Stanford University Campus10.1002/fuce.200400074 ↗
71. Personal communication between W. Colella and R. Menar, Sales Manager, Northwest U.S. Region, UTC Fuel Cells, 20 July 2004.
72. Idatech U.S. Patent Numbers: 5,861,137; 5,997,594; 6,152,995; 6,221,117; 6,242,120; 6,376,113; 6,375,906; 6,383,670.
73. Design considerations for effective control of an afterburner sub-system in a combined heat and power (CHP) fuel cell system (FCS)10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00069-7 ↗
74. Modeling results for the thermal management sub-system of a combined heat and power (CHP) fuel cell system (FCS)10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00071-5 ↗
75. Email communications between W. Colella and J. Staniunas, Engineer, United Technologies Fuel Cells Inc., 15 February 2005.
76. Two-dimensional axi-symmetric model of a solar—thermal fluid wall aerosol flow reactor10.1115/1.1824108 ↗
77. Hydrogen production by solar thermochemical water-splitting/methane reforming process
78. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel production processes10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.01.016 ↗
79. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.
80. M.R. Harrison, T.M. Shires, J.K. Wessels, M.R. Cowgill, Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Industry, United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, EPA/600/SR-96/080, 1997.
81. DTI Review of Energy Sources, British Electricity Grid.
82. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Technology Brief: Analysis of current-day commercial electrolyzers, NREL/FS 560-36705, September 2004.
83. Exploiting wind versus coal10.1126/science.1063376 ↗
84. Masters · 2004
85. General Electric, Wind Energy website, 2005. http://www.gepower.com/businesses/ge_wind_energy/en/products.htm.
86. Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, fourth ed., vol. 6, pp. 541–568.
87. Gasification Plant Cost and Performance Optimization, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2003, DE-AC26-99FT40342 (Chapter V and Appendix H, Subtask 1.7—Coal to Hydrogen Plant).
88. T.C. Bond, D.G. Streets, K.F. Yarber, S.M. Nelson, J.-H. Woo, Z. Klimont, A Technology-Based Global Inventory of Black and Organic Carbon Emissions from Combustion, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 109, D14203, doi: 10.1029/2003JD003697, 2004.10.1029/2003JD003697 ↗
89. Understanding the Health Effects of Components of the Particulate Matter Mix: Progress and Next Steps, HEI Perspectives, Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA, April 2002.
90. Turner · Science · 2004 · 30510.1126/science.1103197 ↗
91. EIA—http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/alternate/page/datatables/table10.html.
92. M.Z. Jacobson, The climate response of fossil-fuel and biofuel soot, accounting for soot's feedback to snow and sea ice albedo and emissivity, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D21201, doi: 10.1029/2004JD004945, 2004.10.1029/2004JD004945 ↗
93. J.T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. Van Der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, C.A. Johnson, Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001, p. 388, ISBN: 0521 80767 0.
94. Email communication between W. Colella and D. Brzezinski, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Assessment and Standards Division, 22 December 2004.