Investigating electrode calendering and its impact on electrochemical performance by means of a new discrete element method model: Towards a digital twin of Li-Ion battery manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium-ion battery (LIB) manufacturing optimization is crucial to reduce its CO2 fingerprint and cost, while improving their electrochemical performance. In this article, we present an experimentally validated calendering Discrete Element Method model for LiNi0.33Mn0.33Co0.33O2–based cathodes by considering explicitly both active material (AM) and carbon-binder domain (CBD). This model was coupled to a pre-existing Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics model describing the slurry equilibration and its drying and a 4D-resolved Finite Element Method model for predicting electrochemical performance. Our calendering model introduces important novelties versus the state of the art, such as the utilization of un-calendered electrode mesostructures resulting from validated simulations of the slurry and drying combined with the explicit consideration of the spatial distribution and interactions between AM and CBD particles, and its validation with both experimental micro-indentation and porosity vs. calendering pressure curves. The effect of calendering on the electrode mesostructure is analyzed in terms of pore size distribution, tortuosity factor and particles arrangement. In addition, the evolution of the macroscopic electrochemical behavior of the electrodes upon the degree of calendering is discussed, offering added insights into the links between the calendering pressure, the electrode mesostructure and its overall performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Can Li-Ion batteries be the panacea for automotive applications?10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.019 ↗
2. The lithium-ion battery: state of the art and future perspectives10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002 ↗
3. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices10.1126/science.1212741 ↗
4. Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage10.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
5. Li-ion battery materials: present and future10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 ↗
6. The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters – a review10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039 ↗
7. The development and future of lithium ion batteries10.1149/2.0251701jes ↗
8. Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019 ↗
9. Simulating process-product interdependencies in battery production systems10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.056 ↗
10. Toward data‐driven applications in lithium‐ion battery cell manufacturing
11. Manufacturing process for improved ultra-thick cathodes in high-energy lithium-ion batteries10.1002/ente.201900167 ↗
12. Investigation of film solidification and binder migration during drying of Li-Ion battery anodes10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.018 ↗
13. Influence of the carbon black dispersing process on the microstructure and performance of Li-ion battery cathodes10.1002/ente.201900161 ↗
14. Influence of dry mixing and distribution of conductive additives in cathodes for lithium ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.081 ↗
15. Intensive powder mixing for dry dispersing of carbon black and its relevance for lithium-ion battery cathodes10.1016/j.powtec.2016.04.011 ↗
16. The influence of slurry rheology on lithium-ion electrode processing
17. Boosting rechargeable batteries R&D by multiscale modeling: myth or reality?10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00239 ↗
18. Accelerated optimization methods for force‐field parametrization in battery electrode manufacturing modeling
19. Controlling binder adhesion to impact electrode mesostructure and transport10.1021/acsami.0c08251 ↗
20. Mesoscale effects in the extraction of the solid-state lithium diffusion coefficient values of battery active materials: physical insights from 3D modeling10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00517 ↗
21. 4D-resolved physical model for Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy of Li(Ni1-x-yMnxCoy)O2-based cathodes in symmetric cells: consequences in tortuosity calculations10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227871 ↗
22. Lithium ion battery electrodes predicted from manufacturing simulations : assessing the impact of the carbon-binder spatial location on the electrochemical performance10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227285 ↗
23. Tracking variabilities in the simulation of Lithium Ion Battery electrode fabrication and its impact on electrochemical performance10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.110 ↗
24. Multiscale simulation platform linking lithium ion battery electrode fabrication process with performance at the cell level10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02647 ↗
25. Electrode mesoscale as a collection of particles: coupled electrochemical and mechanical analysis of NMC cathodes10.1149/1945-7111/ab632b ↗
26. 3D microstructure design of lithium-ion battery electrodes assisted by X-ray nano-computed tomography and modelling
27. Experiment and simulation of the fabrication process of lithium-ion battery cathodes for determining microstructure and mechanical properties10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.014 ↗
28. Mesoscale effective property simulations incorporating conductive binder10.1149/2.0601711jes ↗
29. Thick electrodes for Li-ion batteries: a model based analysis10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.143 ↗
30. X-ray tomography of porous, transition metal oxide based lithium ion battery electrodes10.1002/aenm.201200932 ↗
31. X-ray tomography for lithium ion battery research: a practical guide10.1146/annurev-matsci-070616-123957 ↗
32. Determining the uncertainty in microstructural parameters extracted from tomographic data10.1039/C7SE00498B ↗
33. Calendering effects on the physical and electrochemical properties of Li[Ni 1/3Mn 1/3Co 1/3]O 2 cathode10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.001 ↗
34. Characterization of the calendering process for compaction of electrodes for lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.031 ↗
35. Heated calendering of cathodes for lithium-ion batteries with varied carbon black and binder contents10.1002/ente.201900175 ↗
36. Effect of calendering LiFePO 4 electrodes10.1149/2.029211jes ↗
37. Process modeling of the electrode calendering of lithium-ion batteries regarding variation of cathode active materials and mass loadings10.1016/j.est.2018.05.018 ↗
38. Modelling of the calendering process of NMC-622 cathodes in battery production analyzing machine/material–process–structure correlations10.1002/ente.201900840 ↗
39. Mechanical, electrical, and ionic behavior of lithium-ion battery electrodes via discrete element method simulations
40. Structural and mechanical characterization of lithium-ion battery electrodes via DEM simulations10.1016/j.apt.2018.05.014 ↗
41. Numerical simulation of the behavior of lithium-ion battery electrodes during the calendaring process via the discrete element method10.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.020 ↗
42. Modeling the evolution of lithium-ion particle contact distributions using a fabric tensor approach10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.088 ↗
43. Effect of electrode compression on the wettability of lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.127 ↗
44. Accelerating battery manufacturing optimization by combining experiments
45. Three-phase multiscale modeling of a LiCoO2 cathode: combining the advantages of FIB-SEM imaging and X-ray tomography10.1002/aenm.201401612 ↗
46. Surface charge and the contact of elastic solids10.1088/0022-3727/6/9/304 ↗
47. Mechanical and structural degradation of LiNi x Mn y Co z O 2 cathode in Li-ion batteries: an experimental study10.1149/2.1751713jes ↗
48. Grid indentation analysis of mechanical properties of composite electrodes in Li-ion batteries10.1016/j.eml.2016.03.002 ↗
49. Mechanical and physical properties of LiNi0.33Mn0.33Co0.33O2 (NMC)10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.048 ↗
50. Grid indentation analysis of composite microstructure and mechanics: principles and validation10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.125 ↗
51. Modeling of structure and porosity in amorphous silicon systems using Monte Carlo methods10.1063/1.2743029 ↗
52. 2017
53. The dynamics of capillary flow10.1103/PhysRev.17.273 ↗
54. Pore-network extraction from micro-computerized-tomography images10.1103/PhysRevE.80.036307 ↗
55. Stochasticity of pores interconnectivity in Li-O2 batteries and its impact on the variations in electrochemical performance10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03315 ↗
56. Tortuosity in electrochemical devices: a review of calculation approaches10.1080/09506608.2016.1249995 ↗
57. Characteristics of porous beds and structures10.1002/aic.690020320 ↗
58. On tortuosity and the tortuosity factor in flow and diffusion through porous media10.1016/0009-2509(89)85053-5 ↗
59. A versatile and efficient voxelization-based meshing algorithm of multiple phases10.1021/acsomega.9b01279 ↗
60. Lagadec · 2018
61. Tortuosity determination of battery electrodes and separators by impedance spectroscopy10.1149/2.1141607jes ↗
62. Determination of tortuosity using impedance spectra analysis of symmetric cell10.1149/2.0331711jes ↗
63. Influence of the binder on lithium ion battery electrode tortuosity and performance10.1149/2.0971805jes ↗
64. The effect of particle size on performance of cathode materials of Li-ion batteries
65. Influence of crystallite size on the electrochemical properties of chemically synthesized stoichiometric LiNiO[sub 2]10.1149/1.1495495 ↗
66. Sub-micron LiCoO2 manufactured in a single synthetic step using eutectic self-mixing method10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.041 ↗
67. https://lammps.sandia.gov/, (n.d.). https://doi.org/1.
68. Selection of conductive additives in Li-ion battery cathodes10.1149/1.2767839 ↗