journal article·2008-01

Electricity production from twelve monosaccharides using microbial fuel cells

Tunc Catal, Kaichang Li, Hakan Bermek, Hong Liu

Journal of Power Sources· Volume 175· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Direct generation of electricity from monosaccharides of lignocellulosic biomass was examined using air cathode microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Electricity was generated from all carbon sources tested, including six hexoses ( d-glucose, d-galactose, d(−)-levulose (fructose), l-fucose, l-rhamnose, and d-mannose), three pentoses ( d-xylose, d(−)-arabinose, and d(−)-ribose), two uronic acids ( d-galacturonic acid and d-glucuronic acid) and one aldonic acid ( d-gluconic acid). The mixed bacterial culture, which was enriched using acetate as a carbon source, adapted well to all carbon sources tested, although the adaptation times varied from 1 to 70 h. The maximum power density obtained from these carbon sources ranged from 1240 ± 10 to 2770 ± 30 mW m −2 at current density range of 0.76–1.18 mA cm −2. d-Mannose resulted in the lowest maximum power density, whereas d-glucuronic acid generated the highest one. Coulombic efficiency ranged from 21 to 37%. For all carbon sources tested, the relationship between the maximum voltage output and the substrate concentration appeared to follow saturation kinetics at 120 Ω external resistance. The estimated maximum voltage output ranged between 0.26 and 0.44 V and half-saturation kinetic constants ranged from 111 to 725 mg L −1. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was over 80% for all carbon sources tested. Results from this study indicated that lignocellulosic biomass-derived monosaccharides might be a suitable resource for electricity generation using MFC technology.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Petrus · Green Chem. · 2006 · 8 · 86110.1039/b605036k ↗
2. Ragauskas · Ind. Biotechnol. · 2006 · 2 · 5510.1089/ind.2006.2.55 ↗
3. Brigham · 1996 · 119
4. Wiselogel · 1996 · 105
5. Hinman · Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. · 1989 · 20–21 · 39110.1007/BF02936498 ↗
6. Logan · Trends Microbiol. · 2006 · 14 · 51210.1016/j.tim.2006.10.003 ↗
7. Rabaey · Water Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 52 · 51510.2166/wst.2005.0561 ↗
8. Rezaei · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2007 · 41 · 405310.1021/es070426e ↗
9. Liu · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2004 · 38 · 404010.1021/es0499344 ↗
10. Liu · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 39 · 65810.1021/es048927c ↗
11. Logan · Water Res. · 2005 · 39 · 94210.1016/j.watres.2004.11.019 ↗
12. Zuo · Energy Fuels · 2006 · 20 · 171610.1021/ef060033l ↗
13. Cheng · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 40 · 36410.1021/es0512071 ↗
14. Lovley · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 1988 · 54 · 147210.1128/AEM.54.6.1472-1480.1988 ↗
15. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, in: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 1992.
16. Lovley · Nat. Rev. Microbiol. · 2006 · 4 · 49710.1038/nrmicro1442 ↗
17. Bond · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 2003 · 69 · 154810.1128/AEM.69.3.1548-1555.2003 ↗
18. Rabaey · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 2004 · 70 · 537310.1128/AEM.70.9.5373-5382.2004 ↗
19. Min · Water Res. · 2005 · 39 · 496110.1016/j.watres.2005.09.039 ↗
20. Bjerre · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 1996 · 49 · 56810.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960305)49:5<568::AID-BIT10>3.3.CO;2-4 ↗
21. Pan · Bioresources Technol. · 2005 · 96 · 125610.1016/j.biortech.2004.10.018 ↗
22. Fan · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 171 · 34810.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.220 ↗