Gas-diffusion-layer structural properties under compression via X-ray tomography
Source abstract
Abstract
There is a need to understand the structure properties of gas-diffusion layers (GDLs) in order to optimize their performance in various electrochemical devices. This information is important for mathematical modelers, experimentalists, and designers. In this article, a comprehensive study of a large set of commercially available GDLs' porosity, tortuosity, and pore-size distribution (PSD) under varying compression is presented in a single study using X-ray computed tomography (CT), which allows for a noninvasive measurement. Porosities and PSDs are directly obtained from reconstructed stacks of images, whereas tortuosity is computed with a finite-element simulation. Bimodal PSDs due to the presence of binder are observed for most of the GDLs, approaching unimodal distributions at high compressions. Sample to sample variability is conducted to show that morphological properties hold across various locations. Tortuosity values are the lowest for MRC and Freudenberg, highest for TGP, and in-between for SGL papers. The exponents for the MRC and Freudenberg tortuosity demonstrate a very small dependence on compression because the shapes of the pores are spherical indicating minimal heterogeneity. From the representative-elementary-volume studies it is shown that domains of 1 × 1 mm in-plane and full thickness in through-plane directions accurately represent GDL properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Debe · Nature · 2012 · 486 · 4310.1038/nature11115 ↗
2. Weber · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2014 · 161 · F125410.1149/2.0751412jes ↗
3. Perry · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A506410.1149/2.0101601jes ↗
4. Van Nguyen · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · F145110.1149/2.0411514jes ↗
5. Wei · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2015 · 5
6. Weber · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 2011 · 41 · 113710.1007/s10800-011-0348-2 ↗
7. Soloveichik · Chem. Rev. · 2015 · 115 · 1153310.1021/cr500720t ↗
8. Lin · Science · 2015 · 349 · 152910.1126/science.aab3033 ↗
9. Debe · ECS Trans. · 2006 · 3 · 83510.1149/1.2356202 ↗
10. Steinbach · ECS Trans. · 2011 · 41 · 44910.1149/1.3635579 ↗
11. Steinbach · ECS Trans. · 2010 · 33 · 117910.1149/1.3484611 ↗
12. Zenyuk · ECS Trans. · 2015 · 69 · 125310.1149/06917.1253ecst ↗
13. Zenyuk · Electrochimica Acta · 2014 · 146 · 19410.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.070 ↗
14. Zenyuk · Electrochem. Commun. · 2015 · 53 · 2410.1016/j.elecom.2015.02.005 ↗
15. Zenyuk · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2014 · 161 · F309110.1149/2.0161411jes ↗
16. Mathias · 2003
17. Flückiger · Electrochimica Acta · 2008 · 54 · 55110.1016/j.electacta.2008.07.034 ↗
18. Hwang · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · F68310.1149/2.024211jes ↗
19. LaManna · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2011 · 36 · 502110.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.036 ↗
20. Rashapov · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2015 · 162 · F60310.1149/2.0921506jes ↗
21. Tomadakis · Chem. Eng. Sci. · 1993 · 48 · 332310.1016/0009-2509(93)80149-K ↗
22. Escribano · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 156 · 810.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.08.013 ↗
23. Möst · J. Power Sources · 2009 · 191 · 45610.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.037 ↗
24. Gostick · J. Power Sources · 2009 · 194 · 43310.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.052 ↗
25. Lobato · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 2008 · 38 · 79310.1007/s10800-008-9512-8 ↗
26. El-kharouf · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 218 · 39310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.099 ↗
27. Williams · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A117310.1149/1.1764779 ↗
28. Gostick · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 173 · 27710.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.059 ↗
29. Chan · Electrochimica Acta · 2012 · 65 · 1310.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.110 ↗
30. Zamel · Chem. Eng. Sci. · 2010 · 65 · 93110.1016/j.ces.2009.09.044 ↗
31. Baker · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B99110.1149/1.3152226 ↗
32. Kramer · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2008 · 612 · 6310.1016/j.jelechem.2007.09.014 ↗
33. Martínez · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B8010.1149/1.3005564 ↗
34. Baker · ECS Trans. · 2006 · 3 · 98910.1149/1.2356218 ↗
35. Becker · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B117510.1149/1.3176876 ↗
36. Didari · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2014 · 39 · 937510.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.011 ↗
37. Effective diffusivity in partially-saturated carbon-fiber gas diffusion layers: effect of through-plane saturation distribution10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.02.073 ↗
38. Effective diffusivity in partially-saturated carbon-fiber gas diffusion layers: effect of local saturation and application to macroscopic continuum models10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.034 ↗
39. Rosén · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2012 · 159 · F53610.1149/2.005209jes ↗
40. Myles · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2015 · 162 · F64510.1149/2.0131507jes ↗
41. Tayarani-Yoosefabadi · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 303 · 20810.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.005 ↗
42. Myles · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 02510110.1063/1.4905119 ↗
43. Sinha · J. Mater. Chem. · 2007 · 17 · 308910.1039/b703485g ↗
44. Becker · J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 510.1115/1.2821600 ↗
45. Manke · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 17410510.1063/1.2731440 ↗
46. Buechi · ECS Trans. · 2008 · 16 · 58710.1149/1.2981893 ↗
47. Becker · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B117510.1149/1.3176876 ↗
48. Flückiger · Electrochimica Acta · 2011 · 56 · 225410.1016/j.electacta.2010.12.016 ↗
49. Eller · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · B96310.1149/1.3596556 ↗
50. Fishman · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2010 · 157 · B164310.1149/1.3481443 ↗
51. Lee · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 227 · 12310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.006 ↗
52. Lamibrac · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · F20210.1149/2.0401603jes ↗
53. Khajeh-Hosseini-Dalasm · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 266 · 21310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.004 ↗
54. Tötzke · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 253 · 12310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.062 ↗
55. Understanding water transport in polymer electrolyte fuel cells using coupled continuum and pore-network models10.1002/fuce.201500213 ↗
56. Assessing the utility of FIB-SEM images for shale digital rock physics
57. Groso · Opt. Express · 2006 · 14 · 810310.1364/OE.14.008103 ↗
58. Zenyuk · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 241 · 37910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.165 ↗
59. Epstein · Chem. Eng. Sci. · 1989 · 44 · 77710.1016/0009-2509(89)85053-5 ↗
60. Bultreys · Earth Sci. Rev. · 2016 · 155 · 9310.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.001 ↗
61. McClure · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2014 · 185 · 186510.1016/j.cpc.2014.03.012 ↗
62. Manwart · Phys. Rev. E · 2002 · 66 · 01670210.1103/PhysRevE.66.016702 ↗
63. Intercomparison of 3D pore-scale flow and solute transport simulation methods10.1007/978-3-319-11023-3 ↗
64. Santamaria · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2014 · 161 · F118410.1149/2.0321412jes ↗
65. Fishman · J. Electrochem Soc. · 2011 · 158 · B24710.1149/1.3524284 ↗
66. Doube · Front. Endocrinol. · 2015 · 610.3389/fendo.2015.00015 ↗
67. Lee · Appl. Energy · 2011 · 88 · 511110.1016/j.apenergy.2011.07.011 ↗
68. Cheng · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2008 · 11 · B14810.1149/1.2932055 ↗
69. Owejan · Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. · 2014 · 71 · 58510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.12.059 ↗
70. Gostick · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 162 · 22810.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.096 ↗
71. Kim · J. Mater Sci. · 2014 · 49 · 383110.1007/s10853-014-8096-4 ↗