journal article·2007-03

Hydrogen production through steam electrolysis: Model-based steady state performance of a cathode-supported intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell

J. Udagawa, P. Aguiar, N.P. Brandon

Journal of Power Sources· Volume 166· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Hydrogen production via steam electrolysis may involve less electrical energy consumption than conventional low temperature water electrolysis, reflecting the improved thermodynamics and kinetics at elevated temperatures. The present paper reports on the development of a one-dimensional dynamic model of a cathode-supported planar intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) stack. The model, which consists of an electrochemical model, a mass balance, and four energy balances, is here employed to study the steady state behaviour of an SOEC stack at different current densities and temperatures. The simulations found that activation overpotentials provide the largest contributions to irreversible losses while concentration overpotentials remained negligible throughout the stack. For an average current density of 7000 A m −2 and an inlet steam temperature of 1023 K, the predicted electrical energy consumption of the stack is around 3 kW h per normal m 3 of hydrogen, significantly smaller than those of low temperature stacks commercially available today. However, the dependence of the stack temperature distribution on the average current density calls for strict temperature control, especially during dynamic operation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Stojic · J. Power Sources · 2003 · 118 · 31510.1016/S0378-7753(03)00077-6 ↗
2. Turns · 2000
3. Donitz · 1990 · 213
4. Kobayashi · Solid State Ionics · 2001 · 138 · 24310.1016/S0167-2738(00)00793-1 ↗
5. Schober · Solid State Ionics · 2001 · 139 · 9510.1016/S0167-2738(00)00822-5 ↗
6. Matsumoto · Solid State Ionics · 2002 · 152–153 · 71510.1016/S0167-2738(02)00414-9 ↗
7. Aguiar · J. Power Sources · 2004 · 138 · 12010.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.06.040 ↗
8. Donitz · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 1985 · 10 · 29110.1016/0360-3199(85)90181-8 ↗
9. Hino · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2004 · 233 · 36310.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.08.029 ↗
10. Herring · 2003 · 183
11. Doenitz · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 1982 · 7 · 32110.1016/0360-3199(82)90125-2 ↗
12. Larminie · 2003
13. Process Systems Enterprise Ltd., gPROMS Introductory User Guide, 2002.
14. Salzano · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 1985 · 10 · 80110.1016/0360-3199(85)90168-5 ↗
15. Doenitz · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 1980 · 5 · 5510.1016/0360-3199(80)90114-7 ↗
16. Aguiar · J. Power Sources · 2005 · 147 · 13610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.017 ↗
17. Iora · Chem. Eng. Sci. · 2005 · 60 · 296310.1016/j.ces.2005.01.007 ↗
18. U.G. Bossel, Facts and Figures, Final Report on SOFC Data, IEA Report, Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Operating Agent Task II (1992).
19. Chan · J. Power Sources · 2001 · 93 · 13010.1016/S0378-7753(00)00556-5 ↗
20. Kim · J. Electrochemical Soc. · 1999 · 146 · 6910.1149/1.1391566 ↗
21. Rodriguez · 2003
22. Hydrogenics Corporation, http://www.hydrogenics.com, Accessed on 04/09/2006.