journal article·2008-02

Comparison of different approaches for lifetime prediction of electrochemical systems—Using lead-acid batteries as example

Dirk Uwe Sauer, Heinz Wenzl

Journal of Power Sources· Volume 176· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Different approaches for lifetime prediction for electrochemical energy storage devices are discussed with respect to their general concepts. Examples for their implementation and advantages and disadvantages are given. The models are based on: (a) physical and chemical processes and their interaction as regards ageing effects; (b) weighting of the Ah throughput whenever the operating conditions deviate from the standard conditions used for determining the lifetime under laboratory conditions; (c) an event-oriented concept from mechanical engineering (Wohler curves) which is based on a pattern recognition approach to identify severe operating conditions. Examples and details are explained for lead-acid batteries. The approaches can be applied to other electrochemical technologies including fuel cells. However, it is beyond the scope of this paper, to describe the models in all mathematical details. The models are used in system design and identification of appropriate operating strategies and therefore they must have high computational speed to allow for a comparison of a large number of system variations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Wenzl · J. Power Sources · 2005 · 144 · 37310.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.11.045 ↗
2. Malbranche · 2000
3. Meissner · J. Power Sources · 2003 · 116 · 7910.1016/S0378-7753(02)00713-9 ↗
4. ACTUS—Specific accelerated test procedure for PV batteries with easy transfer to various kinds of systems and for quality control, Final publishable report, European Project, Contract ENK6-2000-00069, 2005.
5. Sauer · J. Power Sources · 1997 · 64 · 18110.1016/S0378-7753(96)02519-0 ↗
6. Jossen · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 154 · 53010.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.041 ↗
7. D.U. Sauer, Optimierung des Einsatzes von Blei-Säure-Akkumulatoren in Photovoltaik-Hybrid-Systemen unter spezieller Berücksichtigung der Batteriealterung, PhD Thesis, Universität Ulm, 2003.
8. Lander · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1956 · 103 · 110.1149/1.2430227 ↗
9. Kaiser · 1997 · S.1577
10. Benchmarking—Development of test procedures for benchmarking components in RES applications, in particular energy storage systems, Final publishable report, European Project, Contract ENK6-CT-2001-80576, 2005, http://www.benchmarking.eu.org/Publications/Publications.htm, last visit August 4, 2006.
11. Seidel · 1978
12. D.U. Sauer, T. Sanders, B. Fricke, T. Baumhöfer, K. Wippermann, A.A. Kulikovsky, H. Schmitz, J. Mergel, J. Power Sources, doi:10.1016/j.jpowersour.2007.08.056, accepted for publication.
13. Kulikovsky · Electrochem. Commun. · 2006 · 8 · 75410.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.011 ↗