journal article·2014-12

Damage of cells and battery packs due to ground impact

Yong Xia, Tomasz Wierzbicki, Elham Sahraei, Xiaowei Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The present paper documents a comprehensive study on the ground impact of lithium-ion battery packs in electric vehicles. With the purpose of developing generic methodology, a hypothetic global finite element model is adopted. The force–displacement response of indentation process simulated by the global FE model is cross-validated with the earlier analytical solutions. The punching process after the armor plate perforation, the ensuing crack propagation of the armor plate as well as the local deformation modes of individual battery cells are clearly predicted by the global modeling. A parametric study is carried out, and a few underlying rules are revealed, providing important clues on the design of protective structure of battery packs against ground impact. In the next step, detailed FE models at the level of a single battery cell and shell casing are developed and simulations are performed using boundaries and loading conditions taken from the global solution. In the detailed modeling the failure of individual components is taken into account, which is an important indicator of electric short circuit of a battery cell and possible thermal runaway. The damage modes and the deformation tolerances of components in the battery cell under various loading conditions are observed and compared.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Smith · 2012
2. Sahraei · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 247 · 50310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.056 ↗
3. Wierzbicki · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 241 · 46710.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.135 ↗
4. Sahraei · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 220 · 36010.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.057 ↗
5. Sahraei · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 201 · 30710.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.094 ↗
6. Teng · Comput. Struct. · 2005 · 83 · 98910.1016/j.compstruc.2004.12.001 ↗
7. Teng · Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2005 · 31 · 66710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.03.013 ↗
8. Bai · Int. J. Fract. · 2010 · 161 · 110.1007/s10704-009-9422-8 ↗
9. Teng · J. Mech. Mater. Struct. · 2007 · 2 · 130710.2140/jomms.2007.2.1309 ↗
10. Lee · Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 2004 · 46 · 75110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.05.004 ↗
11. Beese · Exp. Mech. · 2011 · 51 · 66710.1007/s11340-010-9374-y ↗
12. Dunand · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2010 · 47 · 113010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.12.011 ↗
13. Zhang · J. Power Sources · 2014
14. Aerospace Specification Metals, Inc, http://www.aerospacemetals.com/index.html.
15. Gu · Mater. Des. · 2013 · 44 · 19910.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.062 ↗
16. Stress state dependent failure loci of a talc-filled polypropylene material under static loading and dynamic loading
17. 20.3.5 Crushable foam plasticity models
18. Deshpande · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2000 · 48 · 125310.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
19. 3.2.7 Simple tests on a crushable foam specimen
20. Simonsen · Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2000 · 24 · 101710.1016/S0734-743X(00)00024-5 ↗
21. Petalling of plates under explosive and impact loading10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00028-7 ↗
22. Lee · Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2005 · 31 · 127710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.07.011 ↗
23. Li · Int. J. Fract. · 2010 · 168 · 5310.1007/s10704-010-9554-x ↗
24. Sandia fracture challenge: blind prediction and full calibration to enhance fracture predictability10.1007/s10704-013-9923-3 ↗
25. Wierzbicki · 2013