journal article·2012-07

Genetic identification and fisher identifiability analysis of the Doyle–Fuller–Newman model from experimental cycling of a LiFePO4 cell

Joel C. Forman, Scott J. Moura, Jeffrey L. Stein, Hosam K. Fathy

Publisher page

Abstract

This article examines the problem of identifying the physical parameters of fundamental electrochemistry-based battery models from non-invasive voltage/current cycling tests. The article is particularly motivated by the problem of fitting the Doyle–Fuller–Newman (DFN) battery model to lithium-ion battery cycling data. Previous research in the literature identifies subsets of the DFN model`s parameter experimentally. In contrast, this article makes the two unique contributions of: (i) identifying the full set of DFN model parameters from cycling data using a genetic algorithm (GA), and (ii) assessing the accuracy and identifiability of the resulting full parameter set using Fisher information. The specific battery used within this study has lithium iron phosphate cathode chemistry and is intended for high-power applications such as plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). We use seven experimental cycling data sets for model fitting and validation, six of them derived from PHEV drive cycles. This makes the identified parameter values appropriate for PHEV battery simulation and model-based design and control optimization.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Modeling of galvanostaic charge and discharge of the lithium/polymer/insertion cell10.1149/1.2221597 ↗
2. Simulation and optimization of the dual lithium ion insertion cell10.1149/1.2054684 ↗
3. A. Elgowainy, A. Burnham, M. Wang, J. Molburg, A. Rousseau, Well-to-Wheels Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles, Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory, 2009.10.2172/951259 ↗
4. Parameter estimation and model discrimination for a lithium-ion cell10.1149/1.2422896 ↗
5. On the experimental identification of an electrochemical model of a lithium-ion battery: part II
6. Experiment-driven electrochemical modeling and systematic parameterization for a lithium-ion cell10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.029 ↗
7. A technique for dynamic battery model identification in automotive applications using linear parameter varying structures10.1016/j.conengprac.2009.05.002 ↗
8. Genetic parameter identification of the Doyle–Fuller–Newman model from experimental cycling of a LiFePO4 battery
9. Cover · 1991
10. Cramér-Rao bounds for deterministic modal analysis10.1109/78.215304 ↗
11. Sensitivity analysis and identifiability for differential equation models
12. Khalil · 2002
13. Parameter estimation: local identifiability of parameters10.1152/ajpendo.1990.258.4.E727 ↗
14. Mathematical model reformulation for lithium-ion battery simulations: galvanostatic boundary conditions10.1149/1.3065083 ↗
15. Reduction of an electrochemistry-based Li-ion battery model via quasi-linearization and Padé approximation10.1149/1.3519059 ↗
16. Review of hardware-in-the-loop simulation and its prospects in the automotive area
17. D. LeBlanc, J. Sayer, C. Winkler, R. Ervin, S. Bogard, J. Devonshire, M. Mefford, M. Hagan, Z. Bareket, R. Goodsell, et al., Road Departure Crash Warning System Field Operational Test: Methodology and Results, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Tech. Rep. UMTRI-2006-9-1, June 2006.
18. Correlating dynamometer testing to in-use fleet results of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
19. A stochastic optimal control approach for power management in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
20. Development of first principles capacity fade model for Li-ion cells10.1149/1.1634273 ↗
21. Study of the LiFePO4/FePO4 two-phase system by high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy10.1021/cm0617182 ↗
22. Lithium deintercalation in LiFePO4 nanoparticles via a domino-cascade model10.1038/nmat2230 ↗
23. Confirmation of the domino-cascade model by LiFePO4/FePO4 precession electron diffraction10.1021/cm201783z ↗
24. Discharge model for the lithium iron-phosphate electrode10.1149/1.1785012 ↗
25. Existence of path-dependence in the LiFePO4 electrode
26. Mathematical modeling of lithium iron phosphate electrode: galvanostatic charge/discharge and path dependence10.1149/1.3515902 ↗
27. Modeling of a commercial graphite/LiFePO4 cell10.1149/1.3567007 ↗
28. Nonequilibrium phase transformation and particle shape effect in LiFePO4 material for Li-ion batteries10.1149/1.3610424 ↗
29. Intercalation dynamics in rechargeable battery materials: general theory and phase-transformation waves in LiFePO410.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.083 ↗
30. Monotone piecewise cubic interpolation10.1137/0717021 ↗
31. Burden · 2001
32. Cantú · 2000
33. Plug-in hybrid vehicle charge pattern optimization for energy cost and battery longevity10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.001 ↗
34. S.J. Moura, J.L. Stein, H.K. Fathy, Battery health conscious power management in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles via electrochemical modeling and stochastic control, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, in press, doi:10.1109/TCST.2012.2189773.10.1109/TCST.2012.2189773 ↗