journal article·2009-01

Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations

Stefano Campanari, Giampaolo Manzolini, Fernando Garcia de la Iglesia

Journal of Power Sources· Volume 186· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This work presents a study of the energy and environmental balances for electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells, through the methodology of the well to wheel (WTW) analysis, applied to ECE-EUDC driving cycle simulations. Well to wheel balances are carried out considering different scenarios for the primary energy supply. The fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV) are based on the polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) technology, and it is discussed the possibility to feed the fuel cell with (i) hydrogen directly stored onboard and generated separately by water hydrolysis (using renewable energy sources) or by conversion processes using coal or natural gas as primary energy source (through gasification or reforming), (ii) hydrogen generated onboard with a fuel processor fed by natural gas, ethanol, methanol or gasoline. The battery electric vehicles (BEV) are based on Li-ion batteries charged with electricity generated by central power stations, either based on renewable energy, coal, natural gas or reflecting the average EU power generation feedstock. A further alternative is considered: the integration of a small battery to FCEV, exploiting a hybrid solution that allows recovering energy during decelerations and substantially improves the system energy efficiency. After a preliminary WTW analysis carried out under nominal operating conditions, the work discusses the simulation of the vehicles energy consumption when following standardized ECE-EUDC driving cycle. The analysis is carried out considering different hypothesis about the vehicle driving range, the maximum speed requirements and the possibility to sustain more aggressive driving cycles. The analysis shows interesting conclusions, with best results achieved by BEVs only for very limited driving range requirements, while the fuel cell solutions yield best performances for more extended driving ranges where the battery weight becomes too high. Results are finally compared to those of conventional internal combustion engine vehicles, showing the potential advantages of the different solutions considered in the paper and indicating the possibility to reach the target of zero-emission vehicles (ZEV).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Eurostat website: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu, 2008.
2. F. Garcia de la Iglesia, Energy and environmental analysis of electric and Fuel cell vehicle through Well-to-Wheel driving cycle simulations, Master thesis, Politecnico di Milano, 2007.
3. Think website: http://en.think.no/think/content/view/full/384, 2008.
4. Tesla motors website: http://www.teslamotors.com/performance/tech_specs.php, 2008.
5. Daimler HTR report 2/07 and website: http://www.daimler.com/dccom, 2008.10.1016/S1464-2859(08)70329-8 ↗
6. Honda FCX website: http://world.honda.com/news/2007/4071114All-New-FCX/, 2008-04-07.
7. Toyota FCHV-adv website: http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/news/08/0606_2.html, 2008-06-06.10.1055/s-2008-1078400 ↗
8. Nuvera website: http://www.nuvera.com/products/star.php, 2008.
9. Toyota website for Prius http://www.toyota.com/prius-hybrid/index.html, 2008.
10. Chevrolet Volt: http://www.chevrolet.com/electriccar/, 2008.
11. TIAX LLC for the California Energy Commission, Full fuel cycle assessment, Well to Tank energy inputs, emissions and water impacts, California, February 2007.
12. Argonne National Laboratory for General Motors Corporation, Well-to-Tank Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems-North American Analysis, June 2001.
13. European Commission DG TREN, Analysis and Guidelines for implementation of the CHP Directive 2004/8/EC. Reference Values – Matrix, January 2006.
14. Terna website “Statistical data on electricity”, http://www.terna.it, 2008.
15. Midilli · Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. · 2005 · 9 · 25510.1016/j.rser.2004.05.003 ↗
16. Chiesa · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2005 · 30 · 74710.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.08.002 ↗
17. E. Macchi, From oil to hydrogen economy, Politecnico di Milano, 2003 (in Italian).
18. Valenti · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2008 · 33 · 311610.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.044 ↗
19. Nuvera website: www.nuvera.com, 2008.
20. Bowersa · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2007 · 32 · 143710.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.045 ↗
21. Westbrook · 2001
22. A.N. Brooks, Perspectives of Fuel Cell and Battery Electric Vehicles. Presented at the CARB ZEV Workshop, December 5, 2002.
23. Han · J. Power Sources · 2001 · 101 · 19610.1016/S0378-7753(01)00672-3 ↗
24. J. Van Mierlo, Subat: Sustainable Batteries. Final Public Report, Work Package 5, Vrije Universiteit Brussel –ETEC, 2005.
25. Rand · 1998
26. F.R. Kalhammer, B.M. Kopf, D.H. Swan, V.P. Roan, M.P.Walsh, Status and Prospects for Zero Emissions Vehicle Technology, Report of the ARB Independent Expert Panel 2007, Sacramento, California, April 13, 2007.
27. http://www.thunder-sky.com, document 2007127142910.pdf, 2007.
28. Personal communications with F. Mapelli, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 2007.
29. Ballard website: www.ballard.com, 2008.
30. Gore website: http://www.gore.com, product section on fuel cells, 2008.
31. Campanari · Int. J. of Hydrogen Energy · 2008 · 33 · 136110.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.041 ↗
32. Personal communications with Nuvera, May 2006.
33. Azure Dynamics Corporation website: http://www.azuredynamics.com, 2008.
34. BRUSA Elektronik AG website: http://www.brusa.biz/products/g_products.htm, 2008.
35. Mes-Dea website: www.mes-dea.ch, 2008.
36. Electro Automotive website: http://www.electroauto.com/, 2008.
37. Metric Mind Engineering website: http://www.metricmind.com/, 2008.
38. Solectria Renewables website: http://www.solren.com/products/pwreleccomp.html, 2008.
39. M. Gentilini, Study and LCA analysis of electric vehicles, Master Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, 2005.
40. A cost comparison of fuel-cell and battery electric vehicles10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.016 ↗
41. U. Bossel, Efficiency of Hydrogen Fuel Cell, Diesel-SOFC-Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles, European Fuel Cell Forum, October 2003.
42. Council Directive 70/220/EEC of 20 March 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures to be taken against air pollution by gases from positive-ignition engines of motor vehicles, 1970.
43. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency siteweb: http://www.epa.gov.
44. Konrad · 2003
45. Hydrogen production from ethanol steam reforming: energy efficiency analysis of traditional and membrane processes10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.029 ↗