Effectiveness of using a carbon nanotube-reinforced adhesive in steel beams strengthened with composite materials
Source abstract
Abstract
This work examines the effectiveness of a carbon nanotube-reinforced adhesive used in retrofitting steel beams strengthened with composite materials. The method includes applying an adhesive to the soffit of the beam, crucial for transferring tensile forces from the bonded plate to the original beam through interfacial shear and normal stresses. A key innovation is the use of the nanotube-reinforced adhesive to prevent debonding failures that can occur at the plate ends due to increased shear and normal stresses. This technique has reduced shear stresses at the ends of composite plates by approximately 50%. The enhancements not only improve beam performance but also increase their durability. Additionally, the document recommends using composite plates with a variable cross-section—specifically thinner at the ends—to effectively mitigate shear stress concentrations at the edges. The approach yields significant economic benefits, establishing it as a viable solution for beam retrofitting, combining technological innovation with cost-effectiveness, thus positioning this method favorably for engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Tiaret
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Suárez-Suárez A, Domínguez-Ramírez N, Susarrey-Huerta O. “Numerical formulation solid-layer finite element to simulate reinforced concrete structures strengthened by over-coating”. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2023; 12(6): 481–501. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2023.12.6.481
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.00710.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00090-010.1016/S0141-0296(00)00090-0 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10999-008-9090-210.1007/s10999-008-9090-2 ↗
5. Ljukovac S, Ibrahimbegovic A, Cohodar-Husic M. “Time varying LQR-based optimal control of geometrically exact Reissner’s beam model”. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2024; 13(1): 73–93. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2024.13.1.073
6. Habibi A, Mollazadeh M, Bazrafkan A, et al. “Comparative analysis of multiple mathematical models for prediction of consistency and compressive strength of ultrahigh performance concrete”. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2023; 12(6): 539–555. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2023.12.6.539
7. Hassaine DT, Rabahi A, Benferhat R, et al. Flexural behaviour of steel beams reinforced by carbon fibre reinforced polymer: Experimental and numerical study. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2019; 72(4): 409–419. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.72.4.409
8. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.07410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.074 ↗
9. 10.3390/buildings1303082410.3390/buildings13030824 ↗
10. Nguyen PT, Vi TV, Nguyen TT, et al. The plate on the nonlinear dynamic foundation under moving load. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2023; 12(1): 083–102. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2023.12.1.083
11. Lluis R, Pérez-Aparicio JL, Maimí P, et al. Analytical crack growth in unidirectional composite flywheel. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2023; 12(2): 183–197. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2023.12.2.183
12. Aliyev IG, Gafarbayli KA, Mammadov AJ, et al. Unsteady gas dynamics modeling for leakage detection in parallel pipelines. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2025; 14(4): 371–393. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2025.14.4.371
13. Hung CC, Huandi H, Nguyễn T, et al. Smart design of steel fiber effects on soft computing of steel fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2025; 14(3): 247–267. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2025.14.3.247
14. Kožar I. “Analysis of 3D pendulum sliding along a rope”. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2024; 13(5): 459–470. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2024.13.5.459
15. Saini K, Lalthazuala R, Singh TG. “Flexural behaviour of hybrid high-strength steel I-beams”. Steel and Composite Structures 2025; 55(4): 319–332. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2025.55.4.319
16. Nguyen DD, Ta HD, Dao DS, et al. Column buckling under stochastic three-dimensional material properties: A stochastic finite element analysis. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2025; 14(4): 347–369. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2025.14.4.347
17. Han S-J, Kim M-S, Heo I, et al. Performances of precast concrete composite double wall systems with discontinuous steel members as shear connector. Steel and Composite Structures 2025; 55(4): 283–295. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2025.55.4.283
18. Nuttawit W, Chaikittiratana A. “Exact solutions for static and dynamic analyses of carbon nanotube-reinforced composite plates with Pasternak elastic foundation”. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2025; 39(18): 5459–5472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.12.058
19. He X-J, Zhou C-Y, Wang Y. Interfacial stresses in reinforced concrete cantilever members strengthened with fibre-reinforced polymer laminates. Advances in Structural Engineering 2019; 23: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219868933
20. Seo Y, Ju H, Lee D. “Flexural strength of reinforced concrete members strengthened by fabric reinforced cementitious matrix considering bond characteristics”. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2025; 94(2): 71–83. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2025.94.2.071
21. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.06.00410.1016/j.jcsr.2019.06.004 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00366-021-01424-510.1007/s00366-021-01424-5 ↗
23. Daouadji Tahar H, Abderezak R, Rabia B. “Analysis of mechanical performance of continuous steel beams with variable section bonded by a prestressed composite plate”. Steel and Composite Structures 2024; 50(2): 183–199. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2024.50.2.183
24. 10.3390/inventions1004006110.3390/inventions10040061 ↗
25. 10.3390/jcs906027310.3390/jcs9060273 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0140710.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01407 ↗
27. 10.12989/sem.2017.61.3.39710.12989/sem.2017.61.3.397 ↗
28. 10.1155/2017/361954510.1155/2017/3619545 ↗
29. 10.1177/1369433223119651110.1177/13694332231196511 ↗
30. Elamir EE, Alqhtani M, Alhadad H, et al. Active control procedure for minimizing the dynamic response of carbon nanotube reinforced plates. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2026; 97(3): 311–337. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2026.97.3.311
31. Soares PB, Campos Filho A, Lazzari PM, et al. “Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beams shear-strengthened with CFRP” Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2025; 96(2): 155–166. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2025.96.2.155
32. Saini K, Lalthazuala R, Singh TG. Shear performance of hybrid high-strength steel girders. Steel and Composite Structures 2026; 58(3): 387–414. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2026.58.3.387
33. Allawi AA, Nadhom Shubber A, Gharawi MA, et al. Enhancement of RC T-beams toughness using laced stirrups reinforcement for blast response predictions. structural concrete of the fib 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202200894
34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11657610.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116576 ↗
35. 10.3390/eng611030710.3390/eng6110307 ↗
36. Tayeb B, Daouadji TH, Abbes B, et al. Analysis behavior of composite cellular steel-concrete beams reinforced by composite plate. Earthquakes and Structures 2025; 30(2): 131–153. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2026.30.2.131
37. Rabia B, Daouadji TH, Abbes B, et al. Analysis of interfacial stresses of composite bridge box steel-concrete beam. Coupled Systems Mechanics 2025; 14(5): 431–450. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2025.14.5.431
38. 10.3390/ma1713325010.3390/ma17133250 ↗
39. 10.1186/s43088-024-00584-910.1186/s43088-024-00584-9 ↗
40. 10.59238/j.pt.2023.01.00410.59238/j.pt.2023.01.004 ↗
41. 10.3390/ma1718451010.3390/ma17184510 ↗
42. 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-1385310.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13853 ↗