Analysis of the Galvanostatic Intermittent Titration Technique (GITT) as applied to a lithium-ion porous electrode
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Galvanostatic Intermittent Titration Technique (GITT) experiments were conducted to determine the lithium diffusion coefficient of LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 , used as the active material in a lithium-ion battery porous composite positive electrode. An electrochemical model, based on concentrated solution porous electrode theory, was developed to analyze the GITT experimental results and compare to the original GITT analytical theory. The GITT experimental studies on the oxide active material were conducted between 3.5 and 4.5 V vs. lithium, with the maximum lithium diffusion coefficient value being 10 −10 cm 2 s −1 at 3.85 V. The lithium diffusion coefficient values obtained from this study agree favorably with the values obtained from an earlier electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Weppner · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1977 · 124 · 156910.1149/1.2133112 ↗
2. Ramana · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 159 · 131010.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.11.065 ↗
3. Shaju · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A132410.1149/1.1775218 ↗
4. Yang · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A124710.1149/1.1763139 ↗
5. Abraham · J. Power Sources · 2003 · 119–121 · 51110.1016/S0378-7753(03)00275-1 ↗
6. Andersson · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · A135810.1149/1.1505636 ↗
7. Abraham · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · A145010.1149/1.1613291 ↗
8. D.P. Abraham, (Ed.), Diagnostic Examination of Generation 2 Lithium-Ion Cells and Assessment of Performance Degradation Mechanisms, Argonne National Laboratory Report, ANL-05/21, 2005.
9. Abraham · Electrochim. Acta · 2004 · 49 · 476310.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.040 ↗
10. Abraham · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 170 · 46510.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.071 ↗
11. Newman · 2004
12. Doyle · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1993 · 140 · 152610.1149/1.2221597 ↗
13. Fuller · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1994 · 141 · 110.1149/1.2054684 ↗
14. Doyle · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1996 · 143 · 189010.1149/1.1836921 ↗
15. Darling · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1997 · 144 · 420110.1149/1.1838166 ↗
16. Srinivasan · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A153010.1149/1.1785013 ↗
17. Dees · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2005 · 152 · A140910.1149/1.1928169 ↗
18. Abraham · Electrochim. Acta · 2008 · 53 · 212110.1016/j.electacta.2007.09.018 ↗
19. Dees · J. Electrochem. Soc · 2008 · 155 · A60310.1149/1.2939211 ↗
20. Dees · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 174 · 100110.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.128 ↗
21. Gering · Electrochim. Acta · 2006 · 51 · 312510.1016/j.electacta.2005.09.011 ↗
22. Gúnen · 2003