Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on relevance vectors and a conditional three-parameter capacity degradation model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Lithium-ion batteries are widely used as power sources in commercial products, such as laptops, electric vehicles (EVs) and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). In order to ensure a continuous power supply, the functionality and reliability of lithium-ion batteries have received considerable attention. In this paper, a battery capacity prognostic method is developed to estimate the remaining useful life of lithium-ion batteries. This capacity prognostic method consists of a relevance vector machine and a conditional three-parameter capacity degradation model. The relevance vector machine is used to derive the relevance vectors that can be used to find the representative training vectors containing the cycles of the relevance vectors and the predictive values at the cycles of the relevance vectors. The conditional three-parameter capacity degradation model is developed to fit the predictive values at the cycles of the relevance vectors. Extrapolation of the conditional three-parameter capacity degradation model to a failure threshold is used to estimate the remaining useful life of lithium-ion batteries. Three instance studies were conducted to validate the developed method. The results show that the developed method is able to predict the future health condition of lithium-ion batteries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization · Fault Detection and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Pecht · 2008
2. Cheng · Sensors · 2010 · 10 · 577410.3390/s100605774 ↗
3. Ye · Technometrics · 2012 · 54 · 15910.1080/00401706.2012.676946 ↗
4. Wang · Journal of Sound and Vibration · 2009 · 324 · 114110.1016/j.jsv.2009.02.013 ↗
5. Sun · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · 2012 · 28 · 58510.1016/j.ymssp.2011.09.029 ↗
6. Si · European Journal of Operational Research · 2011 · 213 · 110.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.018 ↗
7. Xing · Energies · 2011 · 4 · 184010.3390/en4111840 ↗
8. Zhang · Journal of Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 600710.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.101 ↗
9. Dubarry · Journal of Power Sources · 2009 · 194 · 54110.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.05.036 ↗
10. Yoshida · Electrochemistry · 2003 · 71 · 101810.5796/electrochemistry.71.1018 ↗
11. Yoshida · Electrochemistry · 2010 · 78 · 48210.5796/electrochemistry.78.482 ↗
12. Burgess · Journal of Power Sources · 2009 · 191 · 1610.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.123 ↗
13. He · Journal of Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 1031410.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.040 ↗
14. Tipping · The Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2001 · 1 · 211
15. Saha · Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on · 2009 · 58 · 29110.1109/TIM.2008.2005965 ↗
16. Goebel · Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, IEEE · 2008 · 11 · 3310.1109/MIM.2008.4579269 ↗
17. Saha · Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2009 · 31 · 29310.1177/0142331208092030 ↗
18. Widodo · Expert Systems with Applications · 2011 · 38 · 1176310.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.063 ↗
19. Caesarendra · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · 2010 · 24 · 116110.1016/j.ymssp.2009.10.011 ↗
20. Di Maio · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · 2012 · 31 · 40510.1016/j.ymssp.2012.03.011 ↗
21. Zio · Expert Systems with Applications · 2012 · 39 · 1068110.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.199 ↗
22. D.G. Tzikas, L. Wei, A. Likas, Y. Yang, P. Galatsanos, University of Ioannina, Ioanni, Greece, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, USA, 2006.
23. Burges · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · 1998 · 2 · 12110.1023/A:1009715923555 ↗
24. Ecker · Journal of Power Sources · 2012 · 215 · 24810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.012 ↗
25. Seber · 2003