journal article·2006-04

A critical review of using the Peukert equation for determining the remaining capacity of lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries

Dennis Doerffel, Suleiman Abu Sharkh

Journal of Power Sources· Volume 155· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

In many applications it is essential to predict the remaining capacity of a battery reliably, accurately and simply. Several existing techniques for predicting the remaining capacity of a lead-acid battery discharged with a variable current are based on variants of Peukert's empirical equation, which relates the available capacity to a constant discharge current. This paper presents a critical review of these techniques in the light of experimental tests that were carried out on two lead-acid commercial batteries. The relevance of these Peukert's equation based techniques to lithium-ion batteries is also discussed in the light of tests carried on a lithium-ion power battery. The basic conclusion of the paper is that Peukert's equation cannot be used to predict the state of charge of a battery accurately unless it is discharged at a constant current and constant temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. R.Y. Ying, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 6,646,419 (2003).
2. R.L. Proctor, G.A. Ure, W.L. Merkes, J. Young, H. Richard, S.H. Kahle, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 5,656,919 (1997).
3. T. Atwater, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 5,640,150 (1997).
4. P. Singh, J. Fennie, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 6,011,379 (2000).
5. T. Atwater, R.M. Dratler, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 5,372,898 (1994).
6. V. Johnson, M. Keyser, Center for Transportation Technologies and Systems National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1999 (available from: http://www.ctts.nrel.gov/analysis/documents/hawker_validation.html#Capacity%20Tests).
7. J.R. Bumby, P.H. Clarke, I. Forster, Forster IEE Proceedings 132 Pt.A (5) (1985).10.1049/ip-a-1.1985.0059 ↗
8. Thermo Analytics Inc. HEVSim Technical Manual on Battery Modeling, 2001 (available from: http://www.thermoanalytics.com/support/publications/batterymodelsdoc.html).
9. Peukert · Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift · 1997 · 20 · 20
10. Linden · 2002
11. Aylor · IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. · 1992 · 39 · 39810.1109/41.161471 ↗
12. Doyle · J. Power Sources · 1994 · 52 · 21110.1016/0378-7753(94)02012-4 ↗
13. Pavlov · J. Power Sources · 1995 · 53 · 910.1016/0378-7753(94)02152-S ↗
14. Pavlov · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · A64410.1149/1.1468644 ↗
15. Pavlov · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · A65410.1149/1.1468645 ↗