journal article·2014-01

Characterization of the solid electrolyte interphase on lithium anode for preventing the shuttle mechanism in lithium–sulfur batteries

Shizhao Xiong, Kai Xie, Yan Diao, Xiaobin Hong

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract To understand the mechanism for preventing the shuttle in lithium–sulfur batteries, the SEI films formed in different electrolyte solutions are studied using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and electrochemical measurements. The SEI film formed in electrolyte solution with LiNO 3 , which is an effective additive to suppress the shuttle, cannot maintain a stable state without polysulfides. The combination of electrochemical data and SEM images indicate that the contribution of LiNO 3 and polysulfides are equally important to form a SEI film which is effective in suppressing the shuttle. This SEI film can be assumed to consist of two sub layers, the top layer composed of oxidized products from polysulfides (lithium sulfates) and the bottom layer composed of the reduced products of polysulfides and LiNO 3 (lithium sulfide and LiN x O y ). We suppose the formation process of this SEI film in detail and give a possible explanation of the mechanism by which the SEI film on the lithium electrode is preventing the shuttle in lithium–sulfur batteries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Armand · Nature · 2008 · 451 · 65210.1038/451652a ↗
2. Bruce · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 1910.1038/nmat3191 ↗
3. Choi · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2012 · 51 · 999410.1002/anie.201201429 ↗
4. Scrosati · J. Power Sources · 2010 · 195 · 241910.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 ↗
5. Yang · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 148610.1021/nl100504q ↗
6. Ji · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 2460 · 50010.1038/nmat2460 ↗
7. Kolosnitsyn · Russ. J. Electrochem · 2006 · 44 · 548
8. Cheon · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · A79610.1149/1.1571532 ↗
9. Cheon · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · A80010.1149/1.1571533 ↗
10. Zhang · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2010 · 3 · 153110.1039/c002639e ↗
11. Ji · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 1852210.1021/ja206955k ↗
12. Wang · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 264410.1021/nl200658a ↗
13. Yang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1538710.1021/ja3052206 ↗
14. Cai · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 647410.1021/nl303965a ↗
15. Xin · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1851010.1021/ja308170k ↗
16. Aurbach · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · A69410.1149/1.3148721 ↗
17. Kumaresan · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2008 · 155 · A57610.1149/1.2937304 ↗
18. Ryu · J. Power Sources · 2009 · 189 · 117910.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.073 ↗
19. Cheon · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A206710.1149/1.1815153 ↗
20. Mikhaylik · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · A30610.1149/1.1545452 ↗
21. Mikhaylik · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A196910.1149/1.1806394 ↗
22. Peled · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1979 · 126 · 204710.1149/1.2128859 ↗
23. Peled · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1997 · 144 · L20810.1149/1.1837858 ↗
24. Xiong · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 236 · 18110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.072 ↗
25. Xiong · Electrochim. Acta · 2012 · 83 · 7810.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.118 ↗
26. Liang · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 983910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.027 ↗
27. Diao · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · A181610.1149/2.020211jes ↗
28. Lane · Electrochim. Acta · 2010 · 55 · 221010.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.058 ↗
29. Vorotyntsev · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2001 · 105 · 18810.1021/jp002486b ↗
30. Zaban · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 308910.1021/jp9514279 ↗
31. Thevenin · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1987 · 134 · 27310.1149/1.2100445 ↗
32. Aurbach · Electrochim. Acta · 2002 · 47 · 142310.1016/S0013-4686(01)00858-1 ↗
33. Rendek · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · E40810.1149/1.1507595 ↗