Size effects and strength fluctuation in nanoscale plasticity
Source abstract
Abstract
Stochastic, discontinuous flow is ubiquitous in the plastic deformation of small-volume metallic materials. We have identified a sizestrengthening effect on the stress to initiate the jerky plastic yielding in nanoscale volumes of copper single crystals, subjected to nanoindentation in different orientations. Such a nanoscale size effect arises due to the stochastic nature of dislocation sources, in contrast to the microscale size effect often attributed to plastic strain gradients. The jerky response can result from the activation of either surface or bulk heterogeneous dislocation sources, as governed by the distribution and resistance of dislocation locks. Implications concerning the deformation mechanism in materials with flow defect-limited characteristics are discussed. 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Greer · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 24541010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410 ↗
2. Volkert · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 556710.1080/14786430600567739 ↗
3. Ng · Philos Mag · 2008 · 88 · 67710.1080/14786430801953126 ↗
4. Gerberich · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 358510.1016/1359-6454(96)00010-9 ↗
5. Kiely · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 57 · 1258810.1103/PhysRevB.57.12588 ↗
6. Gouldstone · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 401510.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.044 ↗
7. Shim · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 109510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.026 ↗
8. Li · Nature · 2002 · 418 · 30710.1038/nature00865 ↗
9. Dimiduk · Science · 2006 · 312 · 118810.1126/science.1123889 ↗
10. Jang · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 175910.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.025 ↗
11. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
12. Zhu · Prog Mater Sci · 2010 · 55 · 71010.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.001 ↗
13. Greer · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 65410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
14. McDowell · Mater Sci Eng R – Rep · 2008 · 62 · 6710.1016/j.mser.2008.04.003 ↗
15. Nix · J Mech Phys Solids · 1998 · 46 · 41110.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0 ↗
16. Sieradzki · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 453310.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.041 ↗
17. Rinaldi · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 51110.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.044 ↗
18. Wang · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 530910.1080/14786430600838296 ↗
19. Zhu · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 02550210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.025502 ↗
20. Jennings · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 562710.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.038 ↗
21. Schuh · Nat Mater · 2005 · 4 · 61710.1038/nmat1429 ↗
22. Schuh · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 215210.1557/JMR.2004.0276 ↗
23. Van Vliet · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 67 · 10410510.1103/PhysRevB.67.104105 ↗
24. Zhu · J Mech Phys Solids · 2004 · 52 · 69110.1016/j.jmps.2003.07.006 ↗
25. Zhong · Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng · 2008 · 197 · 317410.1016/j.cma.2007.10.009 ↗
26. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 339310.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
27. Johnson · 1985
28. Swadener · J Mech Phys Solids · 2002 · 50 · 68110.1016/S0022-5096(01)00103-X ↗
29. Gerberich · J Appl Mech · 2002 · 69 · 43310.1115/1.1469004 ↗
30. Mason · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 05410210.1103/PhysRevB.73.054102 ↗
31. Minor · Nat Mater · 2006 · 5 · 69710.1038/nmat1714 ↗
32. Liang · CMES – Comput Model Eng Sci · 2004 · 6 · 105
33. Zimmerman · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 16550710.1103/PhysRevLett.87.165507 ↗
34. Navarro · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 10550410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.105504 ↗