Stress evolution and capacity fade in constrained lithium-ion pouch cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effects of mechanical stress on lithium-ion battery life are investigated by monitoring the stack pressure and capacity of constrained commercial lithium-ion pouch cells during cycling. Stack stress is found to be a dynamic quantity, fluctuating with charge/discharge and gradually increasing irreversibly over long times with cycling. Variations in initial stack pressure, an important controllable manufacturing parameter, are shown to produce different stress evolution characteristics over the lifetime of the cells. Cells manufactured with higher levels of stack pressure are found to exhibit shorter cycle lives, although small amounts of stack pressure lead to increased capacity retention over unconstrained cells. Postmortem analysis of these cells suggests a coupling between mechanics and electrochemistry in which higher levels of mechanical stress lead to higher rates of chemical degradation, while layer delamination is responsible for the capacity fade in unconstrained cells. Localized separator deformation resulting in nonuniform lithium transport is also observed in all cells.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Vetter · Journal of Power Sources · 2005 · 147 · 26910.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 ↗
2. Peabody · Journal of Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 814710.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.023 ↗
3. Cannarella · Journal of Power Sources · 2013 · 226 · 14910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.093 ↗
4. Wang · Journal of Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 394210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.134 ↗
5. Li · Journal of Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 975710.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.080 ↗
6. Mukhopadhyay · Electrochimica Acta · 2012 · 66 · 2810.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.058 ↗
7. Sethuraman · Journal of Power Sources · 2010 · 195 · 506210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.013 ↗
8. Chon · Physical Review Letters · 2011 · 107 · 04550310.1103/PhysRevLett.107.045503 ↗
9. Cheng · Journal of Power Sources · 2009 · 190 · 45310.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.021 ↗
10. Wang · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · 2007 · 154 · A1410.1149/1.2386933 ↗
11. Wang · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · 2004 · 151 · A27310.1149/1.1635827 ↗
12. Lee · Journal of Power Sources · 2003 · 119–121 · 83310.1016/S0378-7753(03)00281-7 ↗
13. Shi · Journal of Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 812910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.026 ↗
14. Mechanical Properties of Engineered Materials, Marcel Dekker, Inc.
15. Koyama · Advanced Functional Materials · 2006 · 16 · 49210.1002/adfm.200500633 ↗
16. Chin · Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters · 2006 · 9 · A13410.1149/1.2161523 ↗
17. Liu · Journal of Power Sources · 2013 · 232 · 2910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.110 ↗
18. Sethuraman · Journal of Power Sources · 2010 · 195 · 365510.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.034 ↗
19. Rubino · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · 2001 · 148 · A102910.1149/1.1390344 ↗
20. Qi · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · 2010 · 157 · A74110.1149/1.3377130 ↗
21. Zhang · Journal of Power Sources · 2012 · 218 · 5210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.071 ↗