Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Technical and economic prospects of the future production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass have been evaluated. A technology review, including promising future components, was made, resulting in a set of promising conversion concepts. Flowsheeting models were made to analyse the technical performance. Results were used for economic evaluations. Overall energy efficiencies are around 55% HHV for methanol and around 60% for hydrogen production. Accounting for the lower energy quality of fuel compared to electricity, once-through concepts perform better than the concepts aimed for fuel only production. Hot gas cleaning can contribute to a better performance. Systems of 400 MWth input produce biofuels at US$ 8–12/GJ, this is above the current gasoline production price of US$ 4–6/GJ. This cost price is largely dictated by the capital investments. The outcomes for the various system types are rather comparable, although concepts focussing on optimised fuel production with little or no electricity co-production perform somewhat better. Hydrogen concepts using ceramic membranes perform well due to their higher overall efficiency combined with modest investment. Long-term (2020) cost reductions reside in cheaper biomass, technological learning, and application of large scales up to 2000 MWth. This could bring the production costs of biofuels in the US$ 5–7/GJ range. Biomass-derived methanol and hydrogen are likely to become competitive fuels tomorrow.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biofuel production and bioconversion · Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Catalysts for Methane Reforming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. R.E. Katofsky, The Production of Fluid Fuels from Biomass, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Princeton University, Princeton, 1993.
2. E-lab, Running Buses on Hydrogen Fuel Cells: Barriers and Opportunities, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, July–September 2000.
3. A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00057-9 ↗
4. R.H. Williams, E.D. Larson, R.E. Katofsky, J. Chen, Methanol and hydrogen from biomass for transportation, with comparisons to methanol and hydrogen from natural gas and coal, PU/CEES Report 292, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1995, p. 47.
5. BP, BP World Review, www.bp.com, 2001.
6. Assessment of energy systems by using biomass plantation10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00132-0 ↗
7. M.A. Paisley, M.C. Farris, J. Black, J.M. Irving, R.P. Overend, Commercial demonstration of the Battelle/FERCO Biomass gasification process: startup and initial operating experience, in: R.P. Overend, E. Chornet (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Biomass Conference of the Americas, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 1998, pp. 1061–1066.
8. R.H. Perry, D.W. Green, J.O. Maloney, Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 6th Edition, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1987.
9. P.T. Alderliesten, Systeemtstudie hoge-temperatuur gasreiniging—deelstudie 2.3: Alkalimetalen en overige spore-elementen, ECN, Petten, 1990, p. 42 and annexes.
10. S. Consonni, E. Larson, Biomass-gasifier/aeroderivative gas turbine combined cycles, part A: technologies and performance modeling, and part B: performance calculations and economic assessment, in: Proceedings of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ 8th Congress on Gas Turbines in Cogeneration and Utility, Industrial and Independent Power Generation, Portland, 1994.
11. R. van Ree, A. Oudhuis, A. Faaij, A. Curvers, Modelling of a biomass integrated gasifier/combined cycle (BIG/CC) system with the flowsheet simulation programme ASPEN+, The Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN and Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Petten, 1995.
12. M.J.A. Tijmensen, The production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power through biomass gasification, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2000, p. 45 and annexes.
13. K.M. van Dijk, R. van Dijk, V.J.L. van Eekhout, H. van Hulst, W. Schipper, J.H. Stam, Methanol from natural gas—conceptual design & comparison of processes, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 1995, p. 286.
14. Hydrocarbon Processing, Gas Processes ’98, Hydrocarbon Process, 77 (4), 2000.
15. S.C. Mitchell, Hot gas cleanup of sulphur, nitrogen, minor and trace elements, IEA Coal Research, London, 1998, p. 84.
16. H. Klein Teeselink, P.T. Alderliesten, Systeemtstudie hoge-temperatuur gasreiniging—deelstudie 2.4: stofverwijdering, Stork Ketels, B.V., Hengelo, 1990, p. 108.
17. R.H. Williams, Cost-competitive Electricity from Coal with Near-zero Pollutant and CO2 Emissions—Review Draft, PU/CEES, Princeton, NJ, 1998, p. 17.
18. L.R. White, T.L. Tompkins, K.C. Hsieh, D.D. Johnson, in: Proceedings of International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition on Ceramic Filters for Hot Gas Cleanup, Cologne, Germany, 1992, p. 8.10.1115/92-GT-313 ↗
19. A review of sorbent materials for fixed bed alkali getter systems in biomass gasfier combined cycle power generation applications
20. D. Jansen, Systeemtstudie hoge-temperatuur gasreiniging—deelstudie 2.1: H2S/COS-verwijdering, ECN, Petten, 1990.
21. K. Jothimurugesan, A.A. Adeyiga, S.K. Gangwal, in: Proceedings of Advanced Coal-Fired Power Systems Review Meeting on Advanced Hot-Gas Desulfurization Sorbents, Morgantown, West Virginia, 1996.10.2172/16008 ↗
22. M.J.E. Verschoor, A.G. Melman, System Study High Temperature Gas Cleaning at IGCC Systems, NOVEM/TNO Milieu & Energie, 1991, p. 20.
23. H. Oonk, J. Vis, E. Worrell, A. Faaij, J.-W., Bode, The MethaHydro-process—Preliminary Design and Cost Evaluation, TNO, The Hague, 1997.
24. Maximizing H2 production by combined partial oxidation of CH4 and water gas shift reaction10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00455-X ↗
25. Applications of catalytic inorganic membrane reactors to refinery products10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00124-0 ↗
26. Liquid phase methanol synthesis: catalysts, mechanism, kinetics, chemical equilibria, vapor–liquid equilibria, and modeling—a review10.1080/01614949408013929 ↗
27. Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition, 1995.
28. USDOE, Commercial-scale Demonstration of the Liquid Phase Methanol (LPMEOHTM) Process—Clean Coal Technology Topical Report #11, US Department of Energy, 1999.
29. Haldor Topsoe, Hydrogen Production by Steam Reforming of Hydrogen Feedstocks, Haldor Topsoe, 1991.
30. How to specify pressure-swing adsorption units—key components of PSA units
31. D.E. Fain, G.E. Roettger, High temperature inorganic membranes for separating hydrogen, in: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Fossil Energy Materials, Oak Ridge, 1995, pp. 185–193.
32. Parsons I&TG, Decarbonized fuel plants utilizing inorganic membranes for hydrogen separation, in: Proceedings of the Presentation at 12th Annual Conference on Fossil Energy Materials, Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc., Knoxville, 12–14 May 1998.
33. S. Consonni, E. Larson, Biomass-gasifier/aeroderivative gas turbine combined cycles. Part A: technologies and performance modeling, in: Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ 8th Congress on Gas Turbines in Cogeneration and Utility, Industrial and Independent Power Generation, Portland, 1994.
34. M. Rodrigues de Souza, A. Walter, A. Faaij, An analysis of scale effects on co-fired BIG-CC system (biomass + natural gas) in the state of São Paulo/Brazil, in: S. Kyritsis, A.A.C.M. Beenackers, P. Helm, A. Grassi, D. Chiaramonti (Eds.), Proceedings of 1st World Conference on Biomass for Energy and Industry, James & James, London, 2000, pp. 813–816.
35. A. Faaij, B. Meuleman, R. van Ree, Long term perspectives of biomass integrated gasification with combined cycle technology, The Netherlands Agency for Energy and the Environment Novem, Utrecht, 1998, p. 93 and annexes.
36. Effective liquid-phase methanol synthesis utilizing liquid–liquid separation10.1016/0196-8904(95)00072-L ↗
37. Gas Turbine World, Gas Turbine World 1997 Handbook, Pequot Publishing, Fairfield, Canada, 1997, p. 256.
38. Economic scales for first-generation biomass-gasifier/gas turbine combined cycles fueled from energy plantations10.1115/1.2815572 ↗
39. M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1980, p. 973.
40. E. Larson, S. Consonni, T. Kreutz, Preliminary economics of black liquor gasifier/gas turbine cogeneration at pulp and paper mills, in: Proceedings of the 43rd ASME Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress, Exposition and Users Symposium, Stockholm, 1998.10.1115/98-GT-346 ↗
41. A.P.C. Faaij, Energy from Biomass and Waste, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1997, p. 180.
42. A. Agterberg, Bio-energy Trade: Possibilities and Constraints on Short and Longer Term, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 1998, p. 81.
43. D.O. Hall, F. Rosillo-Calle, R.H. Williams, J. Woods, Biomass for energy: supply prospects, in: T.B. Johansson et al. (Eds.), Renewable Energy Sources for Fuels and Electricity, Washington, DC, USA, 1992.10.1016/0301-4215(92)90148-U ↗
44. Methanex, www.methanex.com, 2001.
45. Developing an infrastructure for hydrogen vehicles: a Southern California case study10.1016/S0360-3199(98)00131-1 ↗
46. F. Hendriks, Natural gas as a feedstock for automotive fuels—an alternative to crude oil, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2000, p. 85 and annexes.
47. A.P.C. Faaij, Long term perspectives for production of fuels from biomass integrated assessment and RD&D priorities, 2000.
48. AMI, Beyond the Internal Combustion Engine—The Promise of Methanol Fuel Cell Vehicles, American Methanol Institute, Washington, DC, 2000, p. 60.
49. J.E. Brydges, A hydrogen fueling station in 2005—will it happen? How do we get from here to there? M.Sc. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA, 2000, p. 70 and annexes.
50. OPPA, Assesment of costs and benefits fo flexible and alternative fuel use in the US transportaion sector, Technical report 5: costs of methanol production from biomass, US DOE, Washington DC, USA, 1990.
51. R. Knight, Personal Communications on the Pressurized Renugas Gasifier for Different Conditions, Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, 1998.
52. R. Breault, D. Morgan, Design and Economics of Electricity Production from an Indirectly Heated Biomass Gasifier, Battelle Memorial Institute, Tecogen, Inc., Waltham, USA, 1992.
53. Paisley, Personal Communication, Battelle Columbus Laboratory, Columbus, USA, 1994.
54. S.M. Walas, Rules of Thumb, Selecting and Designing Equipment, Chemical Engineering, 16 March 1987, pp. 75–81.
55. D.L. King, C.E. Bochow Jr., What should an owner/operator know when choosing an SMR/PSA plant?, Hydrocarbon Process., May 2000, Volume 79 (5), pp. 39–48.
56. Primdahl II Improve syngas production using autothermal reforming
57. C. Hendriks, Carbon dioxide removal from coal-fired power plants, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1994, p. 260.10.1007/978-94-011-0301-5_1 ↗
58. D.E. Fain, in: Proceedings of 15th Annual Membrane Technology/Planning Conference on the Amazing Promise of Inorganic Membranes, Membrane Technology, Boston, 1997.10.1016/S0958-2118(00)89244-7 ↗
59. K.D. Adcock, D.E. Fain, D.L. James, B.B. Marshall, M.R. Phillips, L.E. Powell, T. Raj, Ceramic membrane for high temperature gas separation, in: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Fossil Fuel Energy Materials, Oak Ridge, 1999.
60. M.R. DeLallo, T.L. Buchanan, M.G. Klett, M.D. Rutkowski, J.S. White, Decarbonized Fuel Production Facility Baseline Plant—Draft Letter Report, Parsons Power Group, Inc., Reading, PA, 1998, p. 14 and annexes.
61. OECD, National Accounts—Main Aggregates, 1997 Edition, Paris, 1996, p. 170.
62. A. Faaij, Rv. Ree, A. Oudhuis, Gasification of biomass wastes and residues for electricity production: technical, economic and environmental aspects of the BIG/CC option for the Netherlands, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 1995.
63. R. van Ree, Air Separation Technologies—An Inventory of Technologies for ‘Pure’ Oxygen Production for Pulverised Coal Combustion in a CO2(g)/O2(g)-atmosphere, ECN, Petten, 1992, p. 94 (in Dutch).
64. P. van Ooijen, Personal Communication, Azko Nobel, February 2001.
65. H.C. de Lathouder, March, Personal Communication on Economy of Methanol Production, Stamicarbon, DSM Licensing Subsidiary, Geleen, 2001.
66. P.J.A. Tijm, W.R. Brown, E.C. Heydorn, R.B. Moore, in: Proceedings of the Presentation at American Chemical Society Meeting on Advances in Liquid Phase Technology, San Francisco, 13–17 April 1997.
67. Y. Solantausta, T. Bridgewater, D. Beckman, Electricity Production by Advanced Biomass Power Systems, Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Finland, 1996.
68. M. van Walwijk, M. Bückmann, W.P. Troelstra, P.A.J. Achten, Automotive fuels survey. Part 2. Distribution and use, IEA/AFIS Operated by Innas bv, Breda, The Netherlands, 1996, p. 319 and annexes.