journal article·2013-08

Strength and biaxial formability of cryo-rolled 2024 aluminium subject to concurrent recovery and precipitation

M. Weiss, A.S. Taylor, P.D. Hodgson, N. Stanford

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The precipitate-hardenable aluminium alloy 2024 has been processed by rolling to develop a fine microstructure. Four alloy conditions were tested; these included two rolling temperatures and two different ageing sequences. For all four conditions there was an ideal heat-treatment time at which there was a concurrent improvement in both strength and formability. Microstructural modeling has shown that this is the result of a small processing window in which the hardening due to precipitation is larger than the softening due to recovery, while the detrimental effects of particle coarsening on ductility have not yet developed. Cryo-rolling and room-temperature rolling produced materials with similar strengths, but cryo-rolling showed inferior formability. Natural ageing before rolling significantly decreased the formability compared to rolling in the supersaturated condition, and it is proposed that the solute clusters that develop during natural aging inhibit dynamic recovery and consequently increase the dislocation density that develops during rolling.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Rangaraju · Mater Sci Eng A-Struct · 2005 · 398 · 24610.1016/j.msea.2005.03.026 ↗
2. Panigrahi S · Mater Sci Eng A-Struct · 2011 · 528 · 314710.1016/j.msea.2011.01.010 ↗
3. Mabuchi · J Mater Sci Lett · 1998 · 17 · 21510.1023/A:1006584211768 ↗
4. Valiev · Prog. Mater Sci · 2006 · 51 · 88110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003 ↗
5. Xu · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 20310.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.029 ↗
6. Zhilyaev · Prog Mater Sci · 2008 · 53 · 89310.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.03.002 ↗
7. Tsuji · Scripta Mater · 2002 · 47 · 89310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00282-8 ↗
8. Konkova · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 526210.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.056 ↗
9. Yoda · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 65 · 17510.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.02.002 ↗
10. Panigrahi · Mater Sci Eng A-Struct · 2008 · 480 · 29910.1016/j.msea.2007.07.024 ↗
11. Taylor · Mater Sci Eng A-Struct · 2012 · 555 · 14810.1016/j.msea.2012.06.044 ↗
12. Sha · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 165910.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.033 ↗
13. Ringer · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 373110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00039-6 ↗
14. Wang · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 28710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.010 ↗
15. Parel · Mater Des · 2010 · 31 · 210.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.048 ↗
16. Shih · Metall Mater Trans A · 1996 · 27 · 247910.1007/BF02652342 ↗
17. Feng · Mater Sci Eng A-Struct · 2010 · 528 · 70610.1016/j.msea.2010.09.069 ↗
18. Doppalapudi · T Indian I Metals · 2010 · 63 · 3110.1007/s12666-010-0005-1 ↗
19. Cheng · Ma E. Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 582210.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.043 ↗
20. Polmear · 1995
21. ISO 20482: Metallic materials—Sheet and strip—Erichsen cupping test; 2003.
22. Strain Analysis System AutoGrid, Operator’s Manual; 2009.
23. Wang · Int Mater Rev · 2005 · 50 · 19310.1179/174328005X14357 ↗
24. Rosen · Mater Sci Eng · 1969 · 4 · 11510.1016/0025-5416(69)90051-2 ↗
25. Robinson · Int Mater Rev · 1994 · 39 · 21710.1179/imr.1994.39.6.217 ↗
26. Wilson · J Mech Work Technol · 1988 · 16 · 25710.1016/0378-3804(88)90055-1 ↗