journal article·2008-08Open access

Microstructure and mechanical properties of constrained shape-memory alloy nanograins and nanowires

Mathieu Bouville, Rajeev Ahluwalia

Acta Materialia· Volume 56· Issue 14

Abstract

We use the phase-field method to study the martensitic transformation at the nanoscale. For nanosystems such as nanowires and nanograins embedded in a stiff matrix, the geometric constraints and boundary conditions have an impact on martensite formation, leading to new microstructures --such as dots aligned on a square lattice with axes along <01>-- or preventing martensite formation altogether. We also perform tension tests on the nanowires. The stress-strain curves are very different from bulk results. Moreover, they are weakly affected by microstructures -- the mechanical response of nanowires with different microstructures may be similar, while nanowires with the same microstructure may have a different mechanical behavior. We also observe that at the transition temperature, or slightly below it, the narrowest wires behave pseudoelastically whereas wider wires are in the memory-shape regime. Moreover the yield stress does not change monotonically with width: it has a minimum value at intermediate width.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 1998
2. Bhattacharya · 2003
3. Ishida · Thin Solid Films · 1993 · 228 · 21010.1016/0040-6090(93)90600-T ↗
4. Krulevitch · J MEMS · 1996 · 5 · 27010.1109/84.546407 ↗
5. Bhattacharya · J Mech Phys Solids · 1999 · 47 · 53110.1016/S0022-5096(98)00043-X ↗
6. Walker · Sensor Actuat A – Phys · 1990 · 21 · 24310.1016/0924-4247(90)85047-8 ↗
7. Park · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 25550410.1103/PhysRevLett.95.255504 ↗
8. Liang · NanoLetters · 2005 · 5 · 203910.1021/nl0515910 ↗
9. Waitz · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 13710.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.036 ↗
10. Wang · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 92510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.061 ↗
11. Frick · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 222310.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.030 ↗
12. Bollas · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 548910.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.006 ↗
13. Jacobs · Phys Rev B · 1995 · 52 · 632710.1103/PhysRevB.52.6327 ↗
14. Jacobs · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 61 · 658710.1103/PhysRevB.61.6587 ↗
15. Artemev · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 342510.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.016 ↗
16. Seol · Mater Sci Forum · 2002 · 408 · 164510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.408-412.1645 ↗
17. Falk · Acta Metall · 1980 · 28 · 177310.1016/0001-6160(80)90030-9 ↗
18. Onuki · J Phys Soc Jpn · 1999 · 68 · 510.1143/JPSJ.68.5 ↗
19. Bouville · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 97 · 05570110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.055701 ↗
20. Bouville · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 05411010.1103/PhysRevB.75.054110 ↗
21. Bouville M, Ahluwalia R. Submitted for publication (preprint: ).
22. Landau · 1998 · vol. 7
23. Ahluwalia · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 210910.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.040 ↗
24. Kartha · Phys Rev B · 1995 · 52 · 80310.1103/PhysRevB.52.803 ↗