Microstructure of Cu–Be alloy triboxidative wear debris
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The wear mechanism in disk-on-disk tests of a Cu–Be alloy against AISI D2 steel counterparts changes from metallic to oxidative for increasing loads. At low load the wear debris are made of the Cu–Be alloy, whereas above 50 N the main constituents are copper oxides, with a few residual particles of the copper-base alloy. Despite the lower oxidation state, cuprite (Cu2O) is the main fraction of the high-load debris, whereas tenorite (CuO) is less than 10%. An analysis of the X-ray diffraction line profile, supported by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM), shows that cuprite domains are nanocrystalline, with domain sizes distributed about a mean value of 12 ÷ 13 nm, and contain a high density of dislocations (∼5 × 1016 m−2). The small domain size is considered as a possible stabilization mechanism of cuprite against the higher oxidation state oxide tenorite, whereas the large dislocation content is a consequence of the heavy plastic deformation in the contact area. As a further support to the size-stabilization mechanism, a diffraction measurement repeated on the wear debris after a 6 month aging shows a marked increase in the tenorite fraction. According to line profile analysis, the remaining cuprite fraction is made up of nanocrystalline domains (∼6 nm) smaller than in the as-produced debris, thus supporting the hypothesis that small cuprite grains are more stable than larger ones, which more easily transform to tenorite.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Glaeser · 1992 · vol. 20
2. A.S.M., Properties and selection: non ferrous alloys and pure metals, metals handbook, 10th ed., Vol. 2. Materials Park, OH, A.S.M, 1992. pp. 403–423.
3. Don · Wear · 1983 · 91 · 19110.1016/0043-1648(83)90253-3 ↗
4. Straffelini · Wear · 2006 · 259 · 50610.1016/j.wear.2004.11.013 ↗
5. Scardi · Acta Cryst. A · 2002 · 58 · 19010.1107/S0108767301021298 ↗
6. Scardi · 2004 · 68 · 5110.1007/978-3-662-06723-9_3 ↗
7. Scardi · J Appl Cryst · 2006 · 39 · 2410.1107/S0021889805032978 ↗
8. Ampco Metal S.A. Available from: http://www.ampcometal.com.
9. 1993
10. Langford · J Appl Cryst · 2000 · 33 · 96410.1107/S002188980000460X ↗
11. Warren · 1990
12. Wilkens · 1970 · vol. II · 1195
13. Wilkens · Phys Stat Sol A · 1970 · 2 · 35910.1002/pssa.19700020224 ↗
14. Ungár · Phys Stat Sol · 1999 · 171 · 42510.1002/(SICI)1521-396X(199902)171:2<425::AID-PSSA425>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
15. Leoni M, Scardi P. Submitted for publication.
16. Leoni · Z Kristallogr Suppl · 2006 · 23 · 24910.1524/zksu.2006.suppl_23.249 ↗
17. Rigney · Wear · 2000 · 245 · 110.1016/S0043-1648(00)00460-9 ↗
18. Ragone · 1995
19. Palkar · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 53 · 216710.1103/PhysRevB.53.2167 ↗
20. Scardi · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 393 · 39610.1016/j.msea.2004.10.026 ↗
21. Every · 1992 · 29 · 12
22. Velterop · J Appl Cryst · 2000 · 33 · 29610.1107/S0021889800000133 ↗
23. Valiev · Progr Mater Sci · 2000 · 45 · 10310.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
24. Eckert · Nanostruct Mater · 1995 · 6 · 41310.1016/0965-9773(95)00084-4 ↗
25. Tromans · Miner Eng · 2001 · 14 · 135910.1016/S0892-6875(01)00151-0 ↗
26. Every · 1992 · 29 · 68