In-silico & in-vitro evaluation of Hesperetin enhanced sodium alginate/ gelatin/ hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. A.T. Khalaf et al., Bone tissue engineering through 3d bioprinting of bioceramic scaffolds: a review and update. Life (Basel Switzerland). 12(6) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/life1206090310.3390/life12060903 ↗
2. R. Dwivedi et al., Polycaprolactone as biomaterial for bone scaffolds: Review of literature. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 10(1), 381–388 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.00310.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.003 ↗
3. T.M. Koushik, C.M. Miller, E. Antunes, bone tissue engineering scaffolds: function of multi-material hierarchically structured scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater. 12(9), e2202766 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20220276610.1002/adhm.202202766 ↗
4. A.G. Abdelaziz et al., Feb., A review of 3D polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: principles, fabrication techniques, immunomodulatory roles, and challenges. Bioeng. (Basel, Switzerland). 10(2), (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering1002020410.3390/bioengineering10020204 ↗
5. R. Feng, A. Chu, Y. Guo, G. Hu, B. Zhang, Recent Progress in 3D Printing Polymer-Based Bone Scaffolds. Adv. Eng. Mater. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20240239210.1002/adem.202402392 ↗
6. Y. Su et al., Dec., PLGA-based biodegradable microspheres in drug delivery: recent advances in research and application. Drug Deliv. 28(1), 1397–1418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2021.193875610.1080/10717544.2021.1938756 ↗
7. M. Pourmadadi et al., Development of poly(ether sulfone)/poly(vinyl alcohol)/magnesium-doped carbon quantum dot scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 11(5), 2846–2856 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c0212410.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c02124 ↗
8. X. Yuan et al., Recent advances in 3D printing of smart scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and regeneration. Adv. Mater. 36, e2403641 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20240364110.1002/adma.202403641 ↗
9. H. Wang et al., Deep learning models in classifying primary bone tumors and bone infections based on radiographs. NPJ Precis Oncol. 9(1), 72 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-00855-310.1038/s41698-025-00855-3 ↗
10. Z. Li, Q. Wang, G. Liu, A review of 3D printed bone implants. micromachines. 13(4) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1304052810.3390/mi13040528 ↗
11. X. Zhao et al., Beyond hype: unveiling the Real challenges in clinical translation of 3D printed bone scaffolds and the fresh prospects of bioprinted organoids. J. Nanobiotechnol. 22(1), 500 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02759-z10.1186/s12951-024-02759-z ↗
12. S.S. Lee, X. Du, I. Kim, S.J. Ferguson, Scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering. Matter. 5(9), 2722–2759 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.00310.1016/j.matt.2022.06.003 ↗
13. M.C. Varley, S. Neelakantan, T.W. Clyne, J. Dean, R.A. Brooks, A.E. Markaki, Cell structure, stiffness and permeability of freeze-dried collagen scaffolds in dry and hydrated states. Acta Biomater. 33, 166–175 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.04110.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.041 ↗
14. J.-W. Jang, K.-E. Min, C. Kim, J. Shin, J. Lee, S. Yi, Review: Scaffold Characteristics, Fabrication Methods, and Biomaterials for the Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Precis Eng. Manuf. 24(3), 511–529 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00755-710.1007/s12541-022-00755-7 ↗
15. Y. Xu, F. Zhang, W. Zhai, S. Cheng, J. Li, Y. Wang, Unraveling of advances in 3D-printed polymer-based bone scaffolds. Polym. (Basel). 14(3) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1403056610.3390/polym14030566 ↗
16. T. Winkler, F.A. Sass, G.N. Duda, K. Schmidt-Bleek, A review of biomaterials in bone defect healing, remaining shortcomings and future opportunities for bone tissue engineering: the unsolved challenge. Bone Joint Res. 7(3), 232–243 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0270.R110.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0270.R1 ↗
17. D. Kołbuk, M. Heljak, E. Choińska, O. Urbanek, Novel 3D Hybrid nanofiber scaffolds for bone regeneration. Polymers (Basel). 12(3), (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1203054410.3390/polym12030544 ↗
18. S. Pang, D. Wu, A. Gurlo, J. Kurreck, D.A.H. Hanaor, Additive manufacturing and performance of bioceramic scaffolds with different hollow strut geometries. Biofabrication. 15(2) (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/acb38710.1088/1758-5090/acb387 ↗
19. R. Álvarez-Chimal, J. Arenas-Alatorre, M. Álvarez-Pérez, Nanoparticle-polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. A review. Eur. Polym. J. 213, 113093 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.11309310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113093 ↗
20. S.M. Shabestari et al., Role of phosphate-modified cellulose into the scaffold based on poly (glycerol azelaic acid)-co-poly(ε-caprolactone) for using bone regenerative medicine. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 304, 140855 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.14085510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140855 ↗
21. L. A. L. dos Santos, Natural polymeric biomaterials: processing and properties, 201710.1007/978-3-319-58607-6_5 ↗
22. K. Lin, R. Sheikh, S. Romanazzo, I. Roohani, 3D printing of bioceramic scaffolds-barriers to the clinical translation: from promise to reality, and, F. perspectives. Mater (Basel, Switzerland). 12(17), (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1217266010.3390/ma12172660 ↗
23. S. Verrier et al., Tissue engineering and regenerative approaches to improving the healing of large bone defects. Eur. Cell. Mater. 32, 87–110 (2016). https://doi.org/10.22203/ecm.v032a0610.22203/ecm.v032a06 ↗
24. C.I. Codrea, D. Baykara, R.-A. Mitran, A.C.Ç. Koyuncu, O. Gunduz, A. Ficai, 3D-bioprinted gelatin methacryloyl-strontium-doped hydroxyapatite composite hydrogels scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. Polym (Basel). 16(13) (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1613193210.3390/polym16131932 ↗
25. A. Trzeciakiewicz et al., Hesperetin stimulates differentiation of primary rat osteoblasts involving the BMP signalling pathway. J. Nutr. Biochem. 21(5), 424–431 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.01.01710.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.01.017 ↗
26. M.N. Gómez-Cerezo, J. Peña, S. Ivanovski, D. Arcos, M. Vallet-Regí, C. Vaquette, Multiscale porosity in mesoporous bioglass 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 120, 111706 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11170610.1016/j.msec.2020.111706 ↗
27. C.I. Codrea et al., Three-dimensional-printed composite scaffolds containing poly-ε-caprolactone and strontium-doped hydroxyapatite for osteoporotic bone restoration. Polym. (Basel). 16(11) (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1611151110.3390/polym16111511 ↗
28. R.C. de Mota, E.O. da Silva, L.R. de Menezes, Polymer nanocomposites used as scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. Mater. Sci. Appl. 9(8), 679–697 (2018)
29. N. Amiryaghoubi, M. Fathi, A. Safary, Y. Javadzadeh, Y. Omidi, In situ forming alginate/gelatin hydrogel scaffold through Schiff base reaction embedded with curcumin-loaded chitosan microspheres for bone tissue regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 256, 128335 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12833510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128335 ↗
30. S.M. Shabestari et al., pH-responsive chitosan-sodium alginate nanocarriers for curcumin delivery against brain cancer. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 255, 114875 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.11487510.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.114875 ↗
31. Y.D. Nokoorani, A. Shamloo, M. Bahadoran, H. Moravvej, Fabrication and characterization of scaffolds containing different amounts of allantoin for skin tissue engineering. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 16164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95763-410.1038/s41598-021-95763-4 ↗
32. S. Kim, J. Fan, C.-S. Lee, M. Lee, Dual functional lysozyme–chitosan conjugate for tunable degradation and antibacterial activity. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 3(4), 2334–2343 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c0008710.1021/acsabm.0c00087 ↗
33. M. Barbeck et al., Analysis of the in vitro degradation and the in vivo tissue response to bi-layered 3D-printed scaffolds combining PLA and biphasic PLA/bioglass components - Guidance of the inflammatory response as basis for osteochondral regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2(4), 208–223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.06.00110.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.06.001 ↗
34. E. Zingale, E. Weaver, P.M. Bertelli, I. Lengyel, R. Pignatello, D.A. Lamprou, Development of dual drug loaded-hydrogel scaffold combining microfluidics and coaxial 3D-printing for intravitreal implantation. Int. J. Pharm. 665, 124700 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.12470010.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124700 ↗
35. H. Samadian et al., A tailored polylactic acid/polycaprolactone biodegradable and bioactive 3D porous scaffold containing gelatin nanofibers and Taurine for bone regeneration. Sci. Rep. 10, 13366 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70155-210.1038/s41598-020-70155-2 ↗
36. Z. Ebrahimi, S. Irani, A. Ardeshirylajimi, E. Seyedjafari, Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of stem cells by 3D printed PCL scaffolds coated with collagen and hydroxyapatite. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 12359 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15602-y10.1038/s41598-022-15602-y ↗
37. D. Marolt Presen et al., Prolonged cultivation enhances the stimulatory activity of hiPSC mesenchymal progenitor-derived conditioned medium. Stem Cell. Res. Ther. 15(1), 434 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03960-510.1186/s13287-024-03960-5 ↗
38. L. Yin et al., Critical signaling pathways in osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption: mechanisms and therapeutic implications for periprosthetic osteolysis. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 13 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.163943010.3389/fcell.2025.1639430 ↗
39. R. Bagheri-Yarmand et al., Activating RET mutations promotes osteoblastic bone metastases in medullary thyroid cancer. bioRxiv Prepr Serv. Biol. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.09.66385110.1101/2025.07.09.663851 ↗
40. D.I. Hutomo et al., The effect of carbodiimide crosslinkers on gelatin hydrogel as a potential biomaterial for gingival tissue regeneration. Gels. 10(11) (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/gels1011067410.3390/gels10110674 ↗
41. N. Hassan, T. Ahmad, N.M. Zain, S.R. Awang, Identification of bovine, porcine and fish gelatin signatures using chemometrics fuzzy graph method. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 9793 (May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89358-210.1038/s41598-021-89358-2 ↗
42. P. Szterner, M. Biernat, The synthesis of hydroxyapatite by hydrothermal process with calcium lactate pentahydrate: the effect of reagent concentrations, ph, temperature, and pressure. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2022, 1–13, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/348167710.1155/2022/3481677 ↗
43. W. Teng, X. Zhang, V. Merkle, X. Wu, Deformation-induced mechanical anisotropy of gelatin films. Extrem Mech. Lett. 7, 18–26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.01010.1016/j.eml.2016.02.010 ↗
44. A.M.E. Matinong, K.L. Pickering, M.R. Waterland, Y. Chisti, R.G. Haverkamp, Gelatin and collagen from sheepskin. Polym. (Basel). 16(11) (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1611156310.3390/polym16111563 ↗
45. Z. Belattmania et al., Isolation and FTIR-ATR and H NMR Characterization of alginates from the main alginophyte species of the Atlantic Coast of Morocco. Molecules. 25, 4335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2518433510.3390/molecules25184335 ↗
46. A. Sroka-Bartnicka, L. Borkowski, G. Ginalska, A. Ślósarczyk, S. Kazarian, Structural transformation of synthetic hydroxyapatite under simulated in vivo conditions studied with ATR-FTIR spectroscopic imaging. Spectrochim Acta Part. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 171 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2016.07.05110.1016/j.saa.2016.07.051 ↗
47. W. Qiao, Q. Liu, Z. Li, H. Zhang, Z. Chen, Changes in physicochemical and biological properties of porcine bone derived hydroxyapatite induced by the incorporation of fluoride. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18, 110–121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2016.126314010.1080/14686996.2016.1263140 ↗
48. A. Silva, T. Macedo, D. Coletta, S. Feldman, M. Pereira, Synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity of Chitosan/Polyvinyl Alcohol/Bioactive Glass hybrid scaffolds obtained by lyophilization. Matéria (Rio Janeiro). 21, 964–973 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620160004.008910.1590/s1517-707620160004.0089 ↗
49. Z.F. Jebessa, T. Bayisa Bedasa, G.D. Edossa, L. Guta Inki, G. Amenu Abdi, B.A. Woya, Sodium alginate-poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) pH-responsive hydrogels for controlled release of tinidazole. RSC Adv. 16(20), 17997–18010 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra00524a10.1039/d6ra00524a ↗
50. P. Thiyagarajan, A. Padmapriya, A.M. Shanmugharaj, T. Alagesan, DFT theoretical and experimental investigation of gelatin-loaded niobium-doped calcium apatite ceramics to elucidate its structural and electronic characteristics. Next Mater. 7, 100630 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.10063010.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100630 ↗
51. R.P. Alanis-Gómez, E.M. Rivera-Muñoz, G. Luna-Barcenas, J.R. Alanis-Gómez, R. Velázquez-Castillo, Improving the mechanical resistance of hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite materials made of nanofibers with crystalline preferential orientation. Mater. (Basel). 15(13) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1513471810.3390/ma15134718 ↗
52. C. Kaliampakou, N. Lagopati, E.A. Pavlatou, C.A. Charitidis, Alginate-gelatin hydrogel scaffolds; an optimization of post-printing treatment for enhanced degradation and swelling behavior. Gels (Basel Switzerland). 9(11) (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/gels911085710.3390/gels9110857 ↗
53. F. Mukasheva, L. Adilova, A. Dyussenbinov, B. Yernaimanova, M. Abilev, D. Akilbekova, Optimizing scaffold pore size for tissue engineering: insights across various tissue types. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 12, 1444986 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.144498610.3389/fbioe.2024.1444986 ↗
54. S. Chen, M. Wang, Fabrication, Properties, and Applications of Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Adv. Mater. Technol. 11(9), e01877 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20250187710.1002/admt.202501877 ↗
55. I.N. Amirrah, Y. Lokanathan, I. Zulkiflee, M.F.M.R. Wee, A. Motta, M.B. Fauzi, A comprehensive review on collagen type i development of biomaterials for tissue engineering: from biosynthesis to bioscaffold. Biomedicines. 10(9) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines1009230710.3390/biomedicines10092307 ↗
56. A. Bernar, J.V. Gebetsberger, M. Bauer, W. Streif, M. Schirmer, Optimization of the alizarin red S assay by enhancing mineralization of osteoblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24(1) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2401072310.3390/ijms24010723 ↗
57. S. Trivedi et al., A quantitative method to determine osteogenic differentiation aptness of scaffold. J. oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 10(2), 158–160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.04.00610.1016/j.jobcr.2020.04.006 ↗
58. M.N. Hagar, F. Yazid, N.A. Luchman, S.H.Z. Ariffin, R.M.A. Wahab, Comparative evaluation of osteogenic differentiation potential of stem cells derived from dental pulp and exfoliated deciduous teeth cultured over granular hydroxyapatite based scaffold. BMC Oral Health. 21(1), 263 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01621-010.1186/s12903-021-01621-0 ↗
59. J. Kou, Y. Wang, Z. Chen, Y. Shi, Q. Guo, M. Xu, Flexible assistance strategy of lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton based on admittance model. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 67(3), 823–834 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2541-x10.1007/s11431-023-2541-x ↗
60. P. Shannon et al., Nov., Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13(11), 2498–2504 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.123930310.1101/gr.1239303 ↗
61. E. Cojocaru et al., Dual nanofiber and graphene reinforcement of 3D printed biomimetic supports for bone tissue repair. RSC Adv. 14, 32517–32532 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA06167E10.1039/D4RA06167E ↗
62. M.E. Astaneh, F. Noori, N. Fereydouni, Curcumin-loaded scaffolds in bone regeneration. Heliyon. 10(11), (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3256610.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32566 ↗
63. U.B. Mahajan et al., The protective effect of apigenin on myocardial injury in diabetic rats mediating activation of the PPAR-$γ$ pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18(4), 756 (2017)10.3390/ijms18040756 ↗
64. S. Deepthi, J. Venkatesan, S.-K. Kim, J.D. Bumgardner, R. Jayakumar, An overview of chitin or chitosan/nano ceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 93, 1338–1353 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.04110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.041 ↗
65. P.N.B. Rebecca, D. Durgalakshmi, S. Balakumar, R.A. Rakkesh, Biomimetic scaffold development for bone tissue engineering: Crosslinking graphene with collagen to enhance mechanical strength, conductivity, and porous structure. J. Mater. Res. 38(18), 4314–4323 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-023-01145-z10.1557/s43578-023-01145-z ↗
66. M.Z. Krasoń et al., Graphene oxide significantly modifies cardiac parameters and coronary endothelial reactivity in healthy and hypertensive rat hearts ex vivo. ACS Omega. 9(26), 28397–28411 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c0229110.1021/acsomega.4c02291 ↗
67. B.B. Mandal, S.C. Kundu, Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials. 30(15), 2956–2965 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.006 ↗
68. M. Selim, H.M. Mousa, G.T. Abdel-Jaber, A. Barhoum, A. Abdal-hay, Innovative designs of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: Understanding principles and addressing challenges. Eur. Polym. J. 215, 113251 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.11325110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113251 ↗
69. Y. Gao, R. Liu, H. Liang, Food hydrocolloids: structure, properties, and applications. Foods. 13(7) (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods1307107710.3390/foods13071077 ↗
70. Z. Zhang et al., Factors influencing the interactions in gelatin/hydroxyapatite hybrid materials. Front. Chem. 8, 489 (2020)10.3389/fchem.2020.00489 ↗
71. J.M. Posada-Lotero, M.M. Martínez-Garzón, M. Rosero-Moreano, F.N. Jiménez-García, L.R. Giraldo-Torres, Hincapié-Rojas, Preparation and characterization of novel hydroxyapatite/montmorillonite/gelatin-based composites with bone remineralizing potential. ACS Omega. 10(15), 15116–15128 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c1072510.1021/acsomega.4c10725 ↗
72. A. Lach et al., On the influence of graphene oxide and hydroxyapatite modification on alginate-based hydrogel matrix: thermal, physicochemical, and biological considerations. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 149(12), 6021–6037 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13229-x10.1007/s10973-024-13229-x ↗
73. C. Pandey, M.M. Mahapatra, Effect of Long-term Ageing on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Creep Strength Enhanced Ferritic P91 Steel. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 69(9), 1657–1673 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0826-z10.1007/s12666-015-0826-z ↗
74. Y. Chen, W. Yu, A. Benali, D. Lu, S.Y. Kok, R. Wang, Towards Human-like Walking with Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Control Features: Personalized Attachment Point Optimization Method of Cable-Driven Exoskeleton. Front. Aging Neurosci. 16, 1327397 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.132739710.3389/fnagi.2024.1327397 ↗
75. Y. Zhang et al., Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Serpentine Microstructures Bonded To Prestrained Elastomers for Stretchable Electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 2028–2037 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20130295710.1002/adfm.201302957 ↗
76. U. Ripamonti, R. Duarte, Mechanistic insights into the spontaneous induction of bone formation. Biomater. Adv. 158, 213795 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.21379510.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213795 ↗
77. X. Qi et al., Surface-based modified 3D-printed BG/GO scaffolds promote bone defect repair through bone immunomodulation. Compos. Part. B Eng. 257, 110673 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11067310.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110673 ↗
78. C. Constantinescu, A. Matei, M. Tabetah, M. Dinescu, L.V. Zhigilei, J. Schou, Compression of dry lysozyme targets: The target preparation pressure as a new parameter in protein thin film production by pulsed laser deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 481, 120–124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.08910.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.089 ↗
79. A. Hamid et al., Review on smart magnetic polymer scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Polym. Res. 32 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-025-04443-810.1007/s10965-025-04443-8 ↗
80. L. Kumar, D. Ahuja, Polymeric nano-composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: review. 189–219 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13343-5_710.1007/978-3-031-13343-5_7 ↗