DataVXJournal of Porous MaterialsPaper
journal article·2026-06-24

3D printed silk fibroin-bentonite-hydroxyapatite hybrid scaffold with antioxidant property for bone regeneration

Logeshwaran A, Renold Elsen, Ashutosh D. Bagde, Sunita Nayak

Journal of Porous Materials
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Materials processing

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Y. Seol, H. Kang, S.J. Lee, A. Atala, J.J. Yoo, Bioprinting technology and its applications, pp. 1–7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu14810.1093/ejcts/ezu148 ↗
2. ASzwed-Georgiou et al., Bioactive Materials for Bone Regeneration: Biomolecules and Delivery Systems. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 9(9), 5222–5254 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.3C00609/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/AB3C00609_0003.JPEG10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.3C00609 ↗
3. M.M. Germaini, S. Belhabib, S. Guessasma, R. Deterre, P. Corre, P. Weiss, Additive manufacturing of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering – A critical review of the state of the art and new concepts. Prog Mater. Sci. 130, 100963 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2022.10096310.1016/J.PMATSCI.2022.100963 ↗
4. G. Lee, M. Carrillo, J. McKittrick, D.G. Martin, E.A. Olevsky, Fabrication of ceramic bone scaffolds by solvent jetting 3D printing and sintering: Towards load-bearing applications. Addit. Manuf. 33, 101107 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2020.10110710.1016/J.ADDMA.2020.101107 ↗
5. H. Budharaju et al., Ceramic materials for 3D printing of biomimetic bone scaffolds – Current state-of-the-art & future perspectives. Mater. Des. 231, 112064 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2023.11206410.1016/J.MATDES.2023.112064 ↗
6. H.L. Jaber, T.A. Kovács, Preparation and synthesis of hydroxyapatite bio-ceramic from bovine bone by thermal heat treatment. Epitoanyag - J. Silicate Based Compos. Mater. 71(3), 98–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2019.1810.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2019.18 ↗
7. K. Dave, V.G. Gomes, Interactions at scaffold interfaces: Effect of surface chemistry, structural attributes and bioaffinity. Mater. Sci. Engineering: C 105, 110078 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.11007810.1016/J.MSEC.2019.110078 ↗
8. M. Tallawi et al., Strategies for the chemical and biological functionalization of scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering: a review. J. R Soc. Interface. 12, 20150254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/RSIF.2015.025410.1098/RSIF.2015.0254 ↗
9. S. Du et al., Bioactive polymer composite scaffolds fabricated from 3D printed negative molds enable bone formation and vascularization. Acta Biomater. 186, 260–274 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2024.07.03810.1016/J.ACTBIO.2024.07.038 ↗
10. L. Hodásová et al., Polymer infiltrated ceramic networks with biocompatible adhesive and 3D-printed highly porous scaffolds. Addit. Manuf. 39, 101850 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.10185010.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.101850 ↗
11. F.J. Martínez-Vázquez, F.H. Perera, P. Miranda, A. Pajares, F. Guiberteau, Improving the compressive strength of bioceramic robocast scaffolds by polymer infiltration. Acta Biomater. 6(11), 4361–4368 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2010.05.02410.1016/J.ACTBIO.2010.05.024 ↗
12. X. Shi et al., 3D printed intelligent scaffold prevents recurrence and distal metastasis of breast cancer. Theranostics. 10, 10652 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7150/THNO.4793310.7150/THNO.47933 ↗
13. JE.Song, N. Tripathy, D.H. Lee, J.H. Park, G. Khang, Quercetin Inlaid Silk Fibroin/Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Promotes Enhanced Osteogenesis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 10(39), 32955–32964 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.8B08119/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/AM-2018-081198_0006.GIF10.1021/ACSAMI.8B08119/ASSET ↗
14. E. Wenk, H.P. Merkle, L. Meinel, Silk fibroin as a vehicle for drug delivery applications. J. Controlled Release. 150(2), 128–141 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCONREL.2010.11.00710.1016/J.JCONREL.2010.11.007 ↗
15. SA.L. Matthew, F.P. Seib, Silk Bioconjugates: From Chemistry and Concept to Application. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 10(1), 12–28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.2C01116/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/AB2C01116_0006.JPEG10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.2C01116/ASSET ↗
16. M.A. Sakr et al., Development of bentonite-gelatin nanocomposite hybrid hydrogels for tissue engineering. Appl. Clay Sci. 199, 105860 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLAY.2020.10586010.1016/J.CLAY.2020.105860 ↗
17. C. Shuai, W. Yang, P. Feng, S. Peng, H. Pan, Accelerated degradation of HAP/PLLA bone scaffold by PGA blending facilitates bioactivity and osteoconductivity. Bioact Mater. 6(2), 490–502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.00110.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.001 ↗
18. B.Banimohamad-Shotorbani, A. Rahmani, D.A. Bakhshayesh, S. Mehdipour, H. Jarolmasjed, Shafaei, The efficiency of PCL/HAp electrospun nanofibers in bone regeneration: a review. 45(7), 511–531 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2021.189339610.1080/03091902.2021.1893396 ↗
19. A. Logeshwaran, R. Elsen, S. Nayak, Mechanical and biological characteristics of 3D fabricated clay mineral and bioceramic composite scaffold for bone tissue applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 138, 105633 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10563310.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105633 ↗
20. T. Zhou, Y. Yan, C. Zhao, Y. Xu, Q. Wang, N. Xu, Resveratrol improves osteogenic differentiation of senescent bone mesenchymal stem cells through inhibiting endogenous reactive oxygen species production via AMPK activation. Redox Rep. 24(1), 62–69 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13510002.2019.165837610.1080/13510002.2019.1658376 ↗
21. S. Abdulrahman Hussain et al., Efficacy and safety of co-administration of resveratrol with meloxicam in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A pilot interventional study. Clin. Interv Aging. 13, 1621–1630 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S17275810.2147/CIA.S172758 ↗
22. R. Hameister, C. Kaur, S.T. Dheen, C.H. Lohmann, G. Singh, Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) and oxidative stress in arthroplasty. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 108(5), 2073–2087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.B.3454610.1002/JBM.B.34546 ↗
23. A.E. Bădilă, D.M. Rădulescu, A. Ilie, A.G. Niculescu, A.M. Grumezescu, A.R. Rădulescu, Bone Regeneration and Oxidative Stress: An Updated Overview. Antioxid. Basel. 11(2) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ANTIOX1102031810.3390/ANTIOX11020318 ↗
24. H. Hu et al., Regulation of hypoxic stress and oxidative stress in bone grafting: Current trends and future perspectives. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 157, 144–153 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.01.05510.1016/j.jmst.2023.01.055 ↗
25. M.F. Manchope et al., Naringenin mitigates titanium dioxide (TiO 2)-induced chronic arthritis in mice: role of oxidative stress, cytokines, and NFκB. Inflamm. Res. 67, 11–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00011-018-1195-Y/METRICS10.1007/S00011-018-1195-Y/METRICS ↗
26. T. yang Wang, Q. Li, K. shun, Bi, Bioactive flavonoids in medicinal plants: Structure, activity and biological fate. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 13(1), 12–23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJPS.2017.08.00410.1016/J.AJPS.2017.08.004 ↗
27. S. Chakravarty, N. Bhardwaj, B.B. Mandal, N. Sen Sarma, Silk fibroin-carbon nanoparticle composite scaffolds: A cost effective supramolecular ‘turn off’ chemiresistor for nitroaromatic explosive vapours. J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 4(38), 8920–8929 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC03337G10.1039/C6TC03337G ↗
28. I. D’Onofrio et al., Inhalable drug-loaded silk fibroin carriers for pulmonary drug delivery. RSC Adv. 14(37), 27288–27297 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA03324H10.1039/D4RA03324H ↗
29. D. Xue et al., The role of hesperetin on osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells and its function in bone regeneration. Oncotarget. 8, 21031 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18632/ONCOTARGET.1547310.18632/ONCOTARGET.15473 ↗
30. P.A. Miguez et al., Hesperidin Promotes Osteogenesis and Modulates Collagen Matrix Organization and Mineralization In Vitro and In Vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22(6), 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS2206322310.3390/IJMS22063223 ↗
31. K.H. Huang, C.Y. Chen, C.Y. Chang, Y.W. Chen, C.P. Lin, The synergistic effects of quercetin-containing 3D-printed mesoporous calcium silicate/calcium sulfate/poly-ε-caprolactone scaffolds for the promotion of osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2021.01.02410.1016/j.jfma.2021.01.024 ↗
32. (ASTM), ASTM D7334-08 Standard Practice for Surface Wettability of Coatings, Substrates and Pigments by Advancing Contact Angle Measurement. ASTM Int. 08, 1–3 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1520/D7334-08R22.Copyright10.1520/D7334-08R22.Copyright ↗
33. M.N. Gómez-Cerezo, D. Lozano, D. Arcos, M. Vallet-Regí, C. Vaquette, The effect of biomimetic mineralization of 3D-printed mesoporous bioglass scaffolds on physical properties and in vitro osteogenicity. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 109, 110572 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.11057210.1016/J.MSEC.2019.110572 ↗
34. X. Zhang et al., Three-Dimensional Printed Cell Culture Model Based on Spherical Colloidal Lignin Particles and Cellulose Nanofibril-Alginate Hydrogel. Biomacromolecules. 21(5), 1875–1885 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b0174510.1021/acs.biomac.9b01745 ↗
35. G.E. Fawal, H. Hong, X. Mo, H. Wang, Fabrication of scaffold based on gelatin and polycaprolactone (PCL) for wound dressing application. J. Drug Deliv Sci. Technol. 63, 102501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2021.10250110.1016/j.jddst.2021.102501 ↗
36. K.M. Sadek, W. Mamdouh, S.I. Habib, M.E. Deftar, A.N.A. Habib, In Vitro Biological Evaluation of a Fabricated Polycaprolactone/Pomegranate Electrospun Scaffold for Bone Regeneration, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c0460810.1021/acsomega.1c04608 ↗
37. J.Y. Lee et al., Design of a 3D BMP-2-delivering tannylated PCL scaffold and its anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and osteogenic effects in vitro, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms1911360210.3390/ijms19113602 ↗
38. Astm, "F 813-01: Standard Practice for Direct Contact Cell Culture Evaluation of Materials for," 24, 1652–1653 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1520/F0813-20.110.1520/F0813-20.1 ↗
39. Z. Xu, Y. Sun, H. Dai, Y. Ma, H. Bing, Engineered 3D-Printed Polyvinyl Alcohol Scaffolds Incorporating β-Tricalcium Phosphate and Icariin Induce Bone Regeneration in Rat Skull Defect Model. Molecules. 27(14) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES2714453510.3390/MOLECULES27144535 ↗
40. W. Liu et al., Electrospun porous poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate)/lecithin scaffold for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv. 12(19), 11913–11922 (2022)10.1039/D2RA01398C ↗
41. K. Pal et al., Folic acid conjugated curcumin loaded biopolymeric gum acacia microsphere for triple negative breast cancer therapy in invitro and invivo model. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 95, 204–216 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.07110.1016/j.msec.2018.10.071 ↗
42. P. Kumar, I. Rupmanjari, K. Ajay, R.P. Mariadhas, V. Arasu, Insulin signaling pathway assessment by enhancing antioxidant activity due to morin using in vitro rat skeletal muscle L6 myotubes cells. Mol. Biol. Rep. 48(8), 5857–5872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06580-x10.1007/s11033-021-06580-x ↗
43. H. Hong et al., Cytocompatibility of modified silk fibroin with glycidyl methacrylate for tissue engineering and biomedical applications. Biomolecules. 11(1), 1–18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOM1101003510.3390/BIOM11010035 ↗
44. S. Das, D. Pati, N. Tiwari, A. Nisal, S. Sen Gupta, Synthesis of silk fibroin-glycopolypeptide conjugates and their recognition with lectin. Biomacromolecules. 13(11), 3695–3702 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/BM301170U/SUPPL_FILE/BM301170U_SI_001.PDF10.1021/BM301170U/SUPPL_FILE/BM301170U_SI_001.PDF ↗
45. E.T. Baran, K. Tuzlakoǧlu, J.F. Mano, R.L. Reis, Enzymatic degradation behavior and cytocompatibility of silk fibroin–starch–chitosan conjugate membranes. Mater. Sci. Engineering: C 32(6), 1314–1322 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2012.02.01510.1016/J.MSEC.2012.02.015 ↗
46. R. Ferracini, I. Martínez Herreros, A. Russo, T. Casalini, F. Rossi, G. Perale, Scaffolds as Structural Tools for Bone-Targeted Drug Delivery. Pharm. 10(3), (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS1003012210.3390/PHARMACEUTICS10030122 ↗
47. R.Deshpande, S. Shukla, A. Kale, N. Deshmukh, A. Nisal, P. Venugopalan, Silk Fibroin Microparticle Scaffold for Use in Bone Void Filling: Safety and Efficacy Studies. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 8(3), 1226–1238 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.1C01103/SUPPL_FILE/AB1C01103_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.1C01103 ↗
48. A. Logeshwaran, R. Elsen, S. Nayak, Mechanical and biological characteristics of 3D fabricated clay mineral and bioceramic composite scaffold for bone tissue applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 138, 105633 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMBBM.2022.10563310.1016/J.JMBBM.2022.105633 ↗
49. K.A. Burke, D.C. Roberts, D.L. Kaplan, Silk Fibroin Aqueous-Based Adhesives Inspired by Mussel Adhesive Proteins. Biomacromolecules. 17(1), 237 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.BIOMAC.5B0133010.1021/acs.biomac.5b01330 ↗
50. S. Kaushik, P.D. Thungon, P. Goswami, Silk Fibroin: an emerging biocompatible material for application of enzymes and whole cells in bioelectronics and bioanalytical sciences. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 6(8), 4337–4355 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.9B01971/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/AB9B01971_0009.GIF10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.9B01971/ASSET ↗
51. X. Wu, K. Walsh, B.L. Hoff, G. Camci-Unal, Mineralization Biomaterials Bone Tissue Eng. Bioeng. 7(4), 132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOENGINEERING704013210.3390/BIOENGINEERING7040132 ↗
52. K. Rodríguez, J. Sundberg, P. Gatenholm, S. Renneckar, Electrospun nanofibrous cellulose scaffolds with controlled microarchitecture. Carbohydr. Polym. 100, 143–149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2012.12.03710.1016/J.CARBPOL.2012.12.037 ↗
53. Y. Jin, B. Kundu, Y. Cai, S.C. Kundu, J. Yao, Bio-inspired mineralization of hydroxyapatite in 3D silk fibroin hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 134, 339–345 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFB.2015.07.01510.1016/J.COLSURFB.2015.07.015 ↗
54. Z.J. Chen et al., Mineralized self-assembled silk fibroin/cellulose interpenetrating network aerogel for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials Adv. 134, 112549 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2021.11254910.1016/J.MSEC.2021.112549 ↗
55. P. Xiong Sep., B. Ca et al., Sr/P-doped silk fibroin films on Mg-1Ca alloy with dramatic corrosion resistance and osteogenic activities. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4(9), 3163–3176 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.8B0078710.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.8B00787 ↗
56. I. Nugrahani, M.A. Jessica, Amino acids as the potential co-former for co-crystal development: a review. Molecules. 26(11), 3279 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES2611327910.3390/MOLECULES26113279 ↗
57. M. Olszowy, A.L. Dawidowicz, Is it possible to use the DPPH and ABTS methods for reliable estimation of antioxidant power of colored compounds? Chem. Pap. 72(2), 393–400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11696-017-0288-3/TABLES/310.1007/S11696-017-0288-3/TABLES/3 ↗
58. K.J. Lee, Y.C. Oh, W.K. Cho, J.Y. Ma, Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity determination of one hundred kinds of pure chemical compounds using offline and online screening HPLC assay. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med. 2015, 165457 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/16545710.1155/2015/165457 ↗
59. J. Rumpf, R. Burger, M. Schulze, Statistical evaluation of DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, and Folin-Ciocalteu assays to assess the antioxidant capacity of lignins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 233, 123470 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2023.12347010.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2023.123470 ↗
60. C.M.C. Andrés, J.M. Pérez de la Lastra, C.A. Juan, F.J. Plou, E. Pérez-Lebeña, Polyphenols as antioxidant/pro-oxidant compounds and donors of reducing species: relationship with human antioxidant metabolism. Processes 2023. 11(9), 2771 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/PR1109277110.3390/PR11092771 ↗
61. J. Zhang et al., The Role of Flavonoids in the Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 849513 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHAR.2022.84951310.3389/FPHAR.2022.849513 ↗
62. M.S. Shojaee, M. Moeenfard, R. Farhoosh, Kinetics and stoichiometry of gallic acid and methyl gallate in scavenging DPPH radical as affected by the reaction solvent. Scientific Reports 2022. 12(1), 1–9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12803-310.1038/s41598-022-12803-3 ↗
63. J. Jodynis-liebert, M. Kujawska, Biphasic dose-response induced by phytochemicals: experimental evidence. J. Clin. Med. 9(3), 718 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM903071810.3390/JCM9030718 ↗
64. X. Xi, J. Wang, Y. Qin, Y. You, W. Huang, J. Zhan, The biphasic effect of flavonoids on oxidative stress and cell proliferation in breast cancer cells. Antioxidants. 11(4), 622 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ANTIOX11040622/S110.3390/ANTIOX11040622/S1 ↗
65. A. Deb, How stem cells turn into bone and fat. N Engl. J. Med. 380(23), 2268 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMCIBR190516510.1056/NEJMCIBR1905165 ↗
66. M. Ponzetti, N. Rucci, Osteoblast differentiation and signaling: established concepts and emerging topics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 6651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS2213665110.3390/IJMS22136651 ↗