journal article·2005-07

Preparation of Cellular Iron Using Wastes and its Application in Dyeing Wastewater Treatment

Yanxin Wang, Zhen Liang, Ximing Yuan, Yongsheng Xu

Journal of Porous Materials· Volume 12· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Cellular iron (porous iron) was prepared using a mixture of iron filings (waste from machinery industry) or pure iron powder with sawdust (waste from wood industry) and Bisphenol A epoxy resin, heated at 700–750∘C. The porosity of cellular iron increased with the amount of sawdust serving as space-holding filler in the mixture. Carbon oxide gases as burning products of sawdust formed a reducing furnace atmosphere and created additional pores in the iron matrix. When the ratio of iron filings to sawdust was 2:1, the porosity of cellular iron was up to 80%. Batch and column experiments of treating dyeing wastewaters with cellular iron indicate that the decolorization process, a quasi-first order reaction, was pH-dependent. Under acidic conditions, the color removal efficiency using cellular iron was up to 75–80% and three times faster than that using iron filings. The proposed technology has great potential for use in cellular iron mass production and wastewater treatment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Environmental remediation with nanomaterials · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. R.W. Gillham and S.F. O’Hannessin, Ground Water 32, 958 (1994).10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00935.x ↗
2. D.W. Blowes, C.J. Ptacek, and S.G. Benner, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 45, 123 (2000).10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00122-4 ↗
3. C.F. Chew and T.C. Zhang, Water Science and Technology 38(7), 135 (1998).10.2166/wst.1998.0286 ↗
4. R.A. Doong and W.H. Chang, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 116, 221 (1998).10.1016/S1010-6030(98)00292-5 ↗
5. T. Dombek, E. Dolan, and J. Schultz, Environmental Pollution 111, 21 (2001).10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00033-6 ↗
6. A. Ghauch, J. Rima, and C. Amine, Chemosphere 39, 1309 (1999).10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00034-X ↗
7. J. Farrell, J.P. Wang, and P. O’day, Environmental Science and Technology 35, 2026 (2001).10.1021/es0016710 ↗
8. S.J. Monson, L. Ma, and D.A. Cassada, Analytical Chimica Acta 373, 153 (1998).10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00390-0 ↗
9. R.W. Puls, C.J. Paul, and R.M. Powell, Applied Geochemistry 14, 989 (1999).10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00010-4 ↗
10. A. Ramaswami, S. Tawachsupa, and M. Isleyen, Water Research 35, 4474 (2001).10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00168-3 ↗
11. J. Cao, L. Wei, Q. Huang, L. Wang, and S. Han, Chemosphere 38, 565 (1998).10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00201-X ↗
12. S.M. Ponder, J.G. Darab, and T.E. Mallour, Environmental Science and Technology 34, 2564 (2000).10.1021/es9911420 ↗
13. C.B. Wang and W.X. Zhang, Environmental Science and Technology 31, 2154 (1997).10.1021/es970039c ↗
14. S.F. Kang, C.H. Liao, and M.C. Chen, Chemosphere 46, 923 (2002).10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00159-X ↗
15. M. Perez, F. Torrades, X. Domenech, and J. Peral, Water Research. 36, 2703 (2002).10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00506-1 ↗
16. N. Deng, F. Luo, F. Wu, M. Xiao, and X. Wu, Water Research 34, 2408 (2000).10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00099-3 ↗
17. S. Nam and P.G. Tratnyek, Water Research 34, 1837 (2000).10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00331-0 ↗
18. G.J. Davies and S. Zhen, Journal of Materials Science 18, 1899 (1983).10.1007/BF00554981 ↗
19. J. Banhart, Progress in Materials Science 46, 559 (2001).10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗