journal article·2023-08

Highly selective aromatization of light naphtha using mesoporous aluminosilicate catalysts and theoretical model for predicting activity

S. Sujith, B. J. Vaishnavi, Girish Kamath, Ranjith R. Kumar, R. Sudarshan Reddy, G. Valavarasu, Raman Ravishankar, Sanjeev P. Maradur, C. Bennet, Ganapati V. Shanbhag

Journal of Porous Materials· Volume 30· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, various non-zeolitic catalysts were studied for the conversion of light naphtha into aromatics using a down-flow fixed bed reactor in a continuous mode operation. The physicochemical properties of the catalysts were determined using powder X-ray diffractometer, N2 sorption, atomic absorption spectroscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, NH3-temperature programmed desorption and thermogravimetric analysis techniques. Among the several non-zeolitic catalysts such as Al-SBA-15, mesoporous silica-alumina, SAPO-34, and calcined K-10 montmorillonite clay, Al-SBA-15 exhibited high light naphtha conversion of about 45% with 55% selectivity for aromatics. The rest of the catalysts though gave lower conversion, showed higher selectivity of > 90% for aromatics with a very low formation of cracking side products. The catalytic performance of non-zeolitic catalysts was compared with that of HZSM-5. The synergistic effect of physicochemical parameters such as acidity, pore volume, and pore diameter on the aromatic yield was theoretically deduced by constructing a non-linear model using the combination of the catalyst properties. To explore nature and to understand the responsible active sites involved in the mechanism for the light naphtha transformation to aromatics, the model compounds such as n-pentane, n-hexane, and cyclohexane were tested over mesoporous silica-alumina catalyst. The reaction parameters, viz. temperature, ratio of carrier gas to hydrocarbon, and weight hourly space velocity were optimized for obtaining a high aromatic yield. The 24 h time on stream study showed that the catalyst is resistant to coking and was able to retain its activity and selectivity for aromatics.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Antos, G.J., Aitani, A.M., Parera, J.M.: Marcel Dekker Inc (1995)
2. J.L. Hodala, A.B. Halgeri, G.V. Shanbhag, R.S. Reddy, N.V. Choudary, P.V. Rao, M.G. SriGanesh, G. Shah, R. Ravishankar, ChemistrySelect 1, 2515–2521 (2016)10.1002/slct.201600412 ↗
3. N. Viswanadham, J. Gupta, G.M. Dhar, M. Garg, Energy Fuels. 20, 1806–1814 (2006)10.1021/ef0601770 ↗
4. M. Guisnet, N. Gnep, D. Aittaleb, Y. Doyemet, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 87, 255–270 (1992)10.1016/0926-860X(92)80060-P ↗
5. M. Scurrell, Appl. Catal. 41, 89–98 (1988)10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80384-X ↗
6. N. Viswanadham, A. Pradhan, N. Ray, S. Vishnoi, U. Shanker, T.P. Rao, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 137, 225–233 (1996)10.1016/0926-860X(95)00287-1 ↗
7. M. Guisnet, P. Magnoux, Appl. Catal. 54, 1–27 (1989)10.1016/S0166-9834(00)82350-7 ↗
8. L. Li, X. Mu, W. Liu, X. Kong, S. Fan, Z. Mi, C.J. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. 126, 14330–14333 (2014)
9. E.A. Uslamin, H. Saito, Y. Sekine, E.J. Hensen, N. Kosinov, Catal. Today. 369, 184–192 (2021)10.1016/j.cattod.2020.04.021 ↗
10. L.M. Lubango, M.S. Scurrell, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 235, 265–272 (2002)10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00271-5 ↗
11. K. Sharifi, R. Halladj, S.J. Royaee, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 59, 188–206 (2020)10.1515/rams-2020-0037 ↗
12. P.T. Huyen, V.D. Trinh, M.T. Portilla, C. Martínez, Catal. Today. 366, 97–102 (2021)10.1016/j.cattod.2020.03.030 ↗
13. A. Corma, Catal. Lett. 22, 33–52 (1993)10.1007/BF00811768 ↗
14. J.M. Thomas, Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis. 2., completely revised and enlarged Edition, vol. 1–8. Edited by G. Ertl, H. Knözinger, F. Schüth, and J. Weitkamp. Wiley Online Library (2009)10.1002/anie.200901598 ↗
15. N.Y. Chen, T.Y. Yan, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 25, 151–155 (1986)10.1021/i200032a023 ↗
16. Y. Ono, Catal Rev. 34, 179–226 (1992)10.1080/01614949208020306 ↗
17. P. Mériaudeau, C. Naccache, Catal Rev. 39, 5–48 (1997)10.1080/01614949708006467 ↗
18. N. Viswanadham, S. Saxena, M. Kumar, Pet Sci Technol. 29, 393–400 (2011)10.1080/10916460903394037 ↗
19. A. Ishihara, Y. Kodama, T. Hashimoto, Fuel Process. Technol. 213, 106679 (2021)10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106679 ↗
20. W. Wannapakdee, D. Suttipat, P. Dugkhuntod, T. Yutthalekha, A. Thivasasith, P. Kidkhunthod, S. Nokbin, S. Pengpanich, J. Limtrakul, C. Wattanakit, Fuel 236, 1243–1253 (2019)10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.093 ↗
21. N. Rahimi, R. Karimzadeh, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 398, 1–17 (2011)10.1016/j.apcata.2011.03.009 ↗
22. Ravishankar, R., Rao, P.V.C., Choudary, N.V., Shanbhag, G.V., Janardhan, H.L., Halgeri, A.B., Gandham, S.: US Patents (2019)
23. A. Maity, S. Chaudhari, J.J. Titman, V. Polshettiwar, Nat. Commun. 11, 1–12 (2020)10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 ↗
24. N. Viswanadham, R. Kamble, S.K. Saxena, M. Singh, Catal. Commun. 9, 1894–1897 (2008)10.1016/j.catcom.2008.03.011 ↗
25. K. Lee, S. Lee, Y. Jun, M. Choi, J. Catal. 347, 222–230 (2017)10.1016/j.jcat.2017.01.018 ↗
26. P. Tamizhdurai, A. Ramesh, P.S. Krishnan, S. Narayanan, K. Shanthi, S. Sivasanker, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 287, 192–202 (2019)10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.06.012 ↗
27. A. Martins, J.M. Silva, J. Blanchard, P. Massiani, M. Breysse, F.R. Ribeiro, M.F. Ribeiro, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 82, 139–147 (2004)10.1023/B:REAC.0000028815.30623.be ↗
28. J. Du, H. Xu, J. Shen, J. Huang, W. Shen, D. Zhao, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 296, 186–193 (2005)10.1016/j.apcata.2005.08.030 ↗
29. J. Yu, R. Wang, S. Ren, X. Sun, C. Chen, Q. Ge, W. Fang, J. Zhang, H. Xu, D.S. Su, ChemCatChem 4, 1376–1381 (2012)10.1002/cctc.201200067 ↗
30. N. Kulal, R. Vetrivel, C.S. Gopinath, R.K. Ravindran, V.N. Rao, M. Shetty, R. Shrikanth, D. Rangappa, G.V. Shanbhag, Chem. Eng. J. 419, 129439 (2021)10.1016/j.cej.2021.129439 ↗
31. N.A.A. Talib, F. Salam, N.A. Yusof, S.A.A. Ahmad, Y. Sulaiman, RSC Adv. 7, 11101–11110 (2017)10.1039/C6RA26135C ↗
32. N.A. Alba, Z.J. Du, K.A. Catt, T.D. Kozai, X.T. Cui, Biosensors 5, 618–646 (2015)10.3390/bios5040618 ↗
33. U. Lange, N.V. Roznyatovskaya, V.M. Mirsky, Anal. Chim. Acta. 614, 1–26 (2008)10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.068 ↗
34. M. Cui, Z. Song, Y. Wu, B. Guo, X. Fan, X. Luo, Biosens. Bioelectron. 79, 736–741 (2016)10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.012 ↗
35. G.V. Shanbhag, S. Kumbar, S. Halligudi, J Mol Catal A Chem. 284, 16–23 (2008)10.1016/j.molcata.2007.12.025 ↗
36. G. Crépeau, V. Montouillout, A. Vimont, L. Mariey, T. Cseri, F. Maugé, J. Phys. Chem. B. 110, 15172–15185 (2006)10.1021/jp062252d ↗
37. A. Prakash, S. Unnikrishnan, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 90, 2291–2296 (1994)10.1039/ft9949002291 ↗
38. S. Wolfram, The MATHEMATICA ® Book, Version 3 (Cambridge University Press, 1996)
39. S.P. Viswanathan, B.N. Narayanan, Z. Yaakob, S. Padikkaparambil, M. Mohammad, React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 111, 335–345 (2014)10.1007/s11144-013-0645-3 ↗
40. A. Vinu, V. Murugesan, W. Böhlmann, M. Hartmann, J. Phys. Chem. B. 108, 11496–11505 (2004)10.1021/jp048411f ↗
41. W. Shujie, J. Huang, W. Tonghao, S. Ke, W. Hongsu, X. Lihong, X. Haiyan, X. Ling, G. Jingqi, K. Qiubin, Chinese. J. Catal. 27, 9–14 (2006)
42. C. Hu, H. Zhang, S. Wu, R. Xiao, Energy Convers. Manag. 210, 112678 (2020)10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112678 ↗
43. T. Fukunaga, H. Katsuno, Catal. Surv. Asia. 14, 96–102 (2010)10.1007/s10563-010-9092-6 ↗
44. T. Hughes, W. Buss, P. Tamm, R. Jacobson, Stud Surf Sci Catal (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(09)60940-X10.1016/S0167-2991(09)60940-X ↗
45. J. Jarvis, P. He, A. Wang, H. Song, Fuel 236, 1301–1310 (2019)10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.109 ↗
46. Y. Jiang, J. Huang, W. Dai, M. Hunger, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 39, 116–141 (2011)10.1016/j.ssnmr.2011.03.007 ↗