journal article·2021-10

Influence of pore diameter on physical and sensing properties of free-standing Chitosan-Silica Nanocomposite membrane

Deeparati Basu, Kaustav Sen, Syed Minhaz Hossain, Jayoti Das

Journal of Porous Materials· Volume 28· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, we have observed change in different physical properties and glucose sensing capability of Chitosan-Silica nanoparticle composite membranes (CSNCM) with pore diameter variation. For a particular mixture percentage of chitosan and SiNp dust, successful fabrication of deformation free, free-standing membrane formation was possible. Silica nanoparticles of three different sizes (NP1 ~ 100 nm, NP2 ~ 300 nm & NP3 ~ 500 nm) were prepared to produce CSNCM of corresponding pore sizes (CM1, CM2 and CM3 respectively). Hot NaOH etching was performed to induce surface pore in CSNCM matrix by dissolving Silica nanoparticles from the top layer. We have found that pore distribution, surface morphology, optical properties and dielectric properties are very much dependent on pore size of the membranes. For glucose sensing characterization, we have focussed on multi-parametric optical sensitivity of the membranes in presence of glucose molecules and found that, though all three membranes show response in one or more parameters, only CM2 membranes hold the capability to perform as a multi-parametric sensor in our optical sensing arrangement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. A. Yaroshchuk, X. Martínez-Lladó, L. Llenas, M. Rovira, J. de Pablo, J. Flores, P. Rubio, Mechanisms of transfer of ionic solutes through composite polymer nano-filtration membranes in view of their high sulfate/chloride selectivities. Desalin. Water Treat. 6(1–3), 48–53 (2009). https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2009.64210.5004/dwt.2009.642 ↗
2. A. Akbari, R. Yegani, B. Pourabbas, A. Behboudi, Fabrication and study of fouling characteristics of HDPE/PEG grafted silica nanoparticles composite membrane for filtration of humic acid. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 109, 282–296 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.01.03110.1016/j.cherd.2016.01.031 ↗
3. L.-L. Hwang, J.-C. Chen, M.-Y. Wey, The properties and filtration efficiency of activated carbon polymer composite membranes for the removal of humic acid. Desalination 313, 166–175 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.12.01910.1016/j.desal.2012.12.019 ↗
4. SSh. Homaeigohar, K. Buhr, K. Ebert, Polyethersulfone electrospun nanofibrous composite membrane for liquid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 365(1–2), 68–77 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.04110.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.041 ↗
5. P.S. Goh, A.F. Ismail, S.M. Sanip, B.C. Ng, M. Aziz, Recent advances of inorganic fillers in mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 81(3), 243–264 (2011)10.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.042 ↗
6. C.Z. Liang, T.S. Chung, J.Y. Lai, A review of polymeric composite membranes for gas separation and energy production. Prog. Polym. Sci. 97, 101141 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.06.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.06.001 ↗
7. C.C. Yang, Y.J. Lee, J.M. Yang, Direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) based on PVA/MMT composite polymer membranes. J. Power Sources 188(1), 30–37 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.09810.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.098 ↗
8. C.-C. Yang, S.-J. Chiu, K.-T. Lee, W.-C. Chien, C.-T. Lin, C.-A. Huang, Study of poly(vinyl alcohol)/titanium oxide composite polymer membranes and their application on alkaline direct alcohol fuel cell. J. Power Sources 184(1), 44–51 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.01110.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.011 ↗
9. M. Shabani, H. Younesi, A. Rahimpour, M. Rahimnejad, Upgrading the electrochemical performance of graphene oxide-blended sulfonated polyetheretherketone composite polymer electrolyte membrane for microbial fuel cell application. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 22, 101369 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.10136910.1016/j.bcab.2019.101369 ↗
10. M. Ranjani, M. Pannipara, A.G. Al-Sehemi, A. Vignesh, G. Gnana kumar, Chitosan/sulfonated graphene oxide/silica nanocomposite membranes for direct methanol fuel cells. Solid State Ion. 338, 153–160 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.01010.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.010 ↗
11. X.Y. KaiZhang, Temperature and pH-responsive polymeric composite membranes for controlled delivery of proteins and peptides. Biomaterials 25(22), 5281–5291 (2004)10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.032 ↗
12. A. Ali, S. Ahmed, A review on chitosan and its nanocomposites in drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 109, 273–286 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.07810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.078 ↗
13. A.I. Rezk, J.Y. Lee, B.C. Son, C.H. Park, C.S. Kim, Bi-layered nanofibers membrane loaded with titanium oxide and tetracycline as controlled drug delivery system for wound dressing applications. Polymers 11, 1602 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1110160210.3390/polym11101602 ↗
14. K.K. Mahato, I. Yadav, R. Singh, Monika, B.N. Singh, S.K. Singh, B. Ray, M. Kumar, N. Misra, Polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan lactate composite hydrogel for controlled drug delivery. Mater. Res. Express 6(11), 115408 (2019)10.1088/2053-1591/ab4fbd ↗
15. I. Rajzer, E. Menaszek, R. Kwiatkowski, W. Chrzanowski, Bioactive nanocomposite PLDL/nano-hydroxyapatite electrospun membranes for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 25(5), 1239–1247 (2014)10.1007/s10856-014-5149-9 ↗
16. A. Madni, R. Khan, M. Ikram, S.S. Naz, T. Khan, F. Wahid, Fabrication and characterization of chitosan-vitamin C-lactic acid composite membrane for potential skin tissue engineering. Int. J. Polym. Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4362395 (Article ID 4362395)10.1155/2019/4362395 ↗
17. F. Zhao, S. Hu, F. Wang et al., A sulfonated PEEK/PCL composite nanofibrous membrane for periosteum tissue engineering application. J. Mater. Sci. 54, 12012–12023 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03728-w10.1007/s10853-019-03728-w ↗
18. Y. Ivanov, I. Marinov, K. Gabrovska, N. Dimcheva, T. Godjevargova, Amperometric biosensor based on a site-specific immobilization of acetylcholinesterase via affinity bonds on a nanostructured polymer membrane with integrated multiwall carbon nanotubes. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 63(3–4), 141–148 (2010)10.1016/j.molcatb.2010.01.005 ↗
19. C. Ratlam, S. Phanichphant, S. Sriwichai, Development of dopamine biosensor based on polyaniline/carbon quantum dots composite. J. Polym. Res. 27, 183 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02158-610.1007/s10965-020-02158-6 ↗
20. V. Sok, A. Fragoso, Amperometric biosensor for glyphosate based on the inhibition of tyrosinase conjugated to carbon nano-onions in a chitosan matrix on a screen-printed electrode. Microchim. Acta 186, 569 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-3672-610.1007/s00604-019-3672-6 ↗
21. A. Mishra, A.R. Ferhan, C.M.B. Ho et al., Fabrication of plasmon-active polymer-nanoparticle composites for biosensing applications. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00257-910.1007/s40684-020-00257-9 ↗
22. A.K. Singh, M. Singh, N. Verma, Electrochemical preparation of Fe3O4/MWCNT-polyaniline nanocomposite film for development of urea biosensor and its application in milk sample. Food Meas. 14, 163–175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-019-00278-210.1007/s11694-019-00278-2 ↗
23. R.Y.A. Hassan, A.M. Kamel, M.S. Hashem et al., A new disposable biosensor platform: carbon nanotube/poly(o-toluidine) nanocomposite for direct biosensing of urea. J. Solid State Electrochem. 22, 1817–1823 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-017-3857-z10.1007/s10008-017-3857-z ↗
24. M. Ranjani, Y. Sathishkumar, Y.S. Lee, D.J. Yoo, A.R. Kim, G. Gnana kumar, Ni–Co alloy nanostructures anchored on mesoporous silica nanoparticles for non-enzymatic glucose sensor applications. RSC Adv. 5, 57804 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra08471g10.1039/c5ra08471g ↗
25. A. Jasim, M.W. Ullah, Z. Shi, X. Lin, G. Yang, Fabrication of bacterial cellulose/polyaniline/single-walled carbon nanotubes membrane for potential application as biosensor. Carbohydr. Polym. 163(1), 62–69 (2017)10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.056 ↗
26. J. Zhou, Z. Ma, X. Hong, Wu. Hui-Min, S.-Y. Ma, Y. Li, D.-J. Chen, Yu. Hai-Yin, X.-J. Huang, Top-down strategy of implantable biosensor using adaptable, porous hollow fibrous membrane. ACS Sens. 4(4), 931–937 (2019)10.1021/acssensors.9b00035 ↗
27. T. Guo, J. Gao, X. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Xue, a novel glucose biosensor based on hierarchically porous block copolymer film. Polymers 10(7), 723 (2018)10.3390/polym10070723 ↗
28. S.D. Rani, R. Ramachandran, S. Sheet, M.A. Aziz, Y.S. Lee, A.G. Al-Sehemi, M. Pannipara, Y. Xia, S.Y. Tsai, F.L. Ng, S.M. Phang, G. Gnana kumar, NiMoO4 nanoparticles decorated carbon nanofiber membranes for the flexible and high performance glucose sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 312, 127886 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.12788610.1016/j.snb.2020.127886 ↗
29. V. Archana, Y. Xia, R. Fang, G. Gnana kumar, Hierarchical CuO/NiO-carbon nanocomposite derived from metal organic framework on cello tape for the flexible and high performance nonenzymatic electrochemical glucose sensors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7(7), 6707–6719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0598010.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05980 ↗
30. T. Raj kumar, K.J. Babu, D.J. Yoo, A.R. Kim, G. Gnana kumar, Binder free and free-standing electrospun membrane architecture for sensitive and selective non-enzymatic glucose sensors. RSC Adv. 5, 41457 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra03305e10.1039/c5ra03305e ↗
31. K. Vasuki, G. Siva, A. Balasubramani, M. Pannipara, A.G. Al-Sehemi, Y. Xia, R. Fang, D.J. Yoo, T.R. Kumar, R. Ramachandran, G. Gnana kumar, Surfactant and binder free hierarchical NCNPs@CuO nanostructures on ITO for the cost effective enzyme-free glucose sensor applications. Appl. Phys. A 125, 384 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-2652-310.1007/s00339-019-2652-3 ↗
32. K.J. Babu, T. Raj kumar, D.J. Yoo, S.M. Phang, G. Gnana kumar, Electrodeposited nickel cobalt sulfide flowerlike architectures on disposable cellulose filter paper for enzyme-free glucose sensor applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 16982–16989 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0434010.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04340 ↗
33. P.K. Dutta, J. Dutta, V.S. Tripathi, Chitin and chitosan: chemistry, properties and application. J. Sci. Industrial Res. 63, 20–31 (2014)
34. M. Rinaudo, Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 31(7), 603–632 (2006)10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001 ↗
35. D. Altiok, E. Altiok, F. Tihminlioglu, Physical, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of chitosan films incorporated with thyme oil for potential wound healing applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 21(7), 2227–2236 (2010)10.1007/s10856-010-4065-x ↗
36. N. Velmurugan, G. Kumar, S.S. Han, K.S. Nahm, Y.S. Lee, Synthesis and characterization of potential fungicidal silver nano-sized particles and chitosan membrane containing silver particles. Iran. Polym. J. (English Edition) 18(5), 383–392 (2009)
37. A.K. Azad, N. Sermsintham, S. Chandrkrachang, W.F. Stevens, Chitosan membrane as a wound-healing dressing: characterization and clinical application. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 69B(2), 216–222 (2004)10.1002/jbm.b.30000 ↗
38. F. Al-Sagheer, S. Muslim, “Thermal and mechanical properties of chitosan/sio2hybrid composites.” J. Nanomater. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/49067910.1155/2010/490679 ↗
39. T.M. Budnyak, I.V. Pylypchuk, V.A. Tertykh et al., Synthesis and adsorption properties of chitosan-silica nanocomposite prepared by sol-gel method. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 10, 87 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-014-0722-110.1186/s11671-014-0722-1 ↗
40. C. Pandis, S. Madeira, J. Matos, A. Kyritsis, J.F. Mano, J.L.G. Ribelles, Chitosan–silica hybrid porous membranes. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 42, 553–561 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.05.07310.1016/j.msec.2014.05.073 ↗
41. R. Darvishi Cheshmeh Soltani, A.R. Khataee, M. Safari, S.W. Joo, Preparation of bio-silica/chitosan nanocomposite for adsorption of a textile dye in aqueous solutions. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 85, 383–391 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.09.00410.1016/j.ibiod.2013.09.004 ↗
42. Y.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Hsu, Y.-H. Su, J.-Y. Lai, Chitosan−silica complex membranes from sulfonic acid functionalized silica nanoparticles for pervaporation dehydration of ethanol−water solutions. Biomacromol 6(1), 368–373 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049531w10.1021/bm049531w ↗
43. W. Stober, A. Fink, E. Bohn, Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 26, 62–69 (1968)10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5 ↗
44. X.C. Tan, Y.X. Tian, P.X. Cai, X.Y. Zou, Glucose biosensor based on glucose oxidase immobilized in sol-gel chitosan/silica hybrid composite film on Prussian blue modified glass carbon electrode. Anal. Bioanal. Chemi. 381, 500–7 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2956-810.1007/s00216-004-2956-8 ↗
45. H. Chen, R. Yuan, Y. Chai et al., Glucose biosensor based on electrodeposited platinum nanoparticles and three-dimensional porous chitosan membranes. Biotechnol. Lett. 32, 1401–1404 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-010-0303-z10.1007/s10529-010-0303-z ↗
46. P.R. Solanki, A. Kaushik, A.A. Ansari, A. Tiwari, B.D. Malhotra, Multi-walled carbon nanotubes/sol–gel-derived silica/chitosan nanobiocomposite for total cholesterol sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 137(2), 727–735 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2008.12.04410.1016/j.snb.2008.12.044 ↗
47. X. Chen, J. Jia, S. Dong, Organically modified sol-gel/chitosan composite based glucose biosensor. Electroanalysis 15, 608–612 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.20039007610.1002/elan.200390076 ↗
48. J.V.H. Ramos, F. de Matos Morawski, T.M.H. Costa, S.L.P. Dias, E.V. Benvenutti, E.W. de Menezes, L.T. Arenas, Mesoporous chitosan/silica hybrid material applied for development of electrochemical sensor for paracetamol in presence of dopamine. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 217(15), 109–118 (2015)10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.06.010 ↗
49. X. Liu, L. Xie, H. Li, Electrochemical biosensor based on reduced graphene oxide and Au nanoparticles entrapped in chitosan/silica sol–gel hybrid membranes for determination of dopamine and uric acid. J. Electroanal. Chem. 682, 158–163 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.07.03110.1016/j.jelechem.2012.07.031 ↗
50. D. Basu, T. Sarkar, K. Sen, S.M. Hossain, J. Das, Multi-parametric optical glucose sensor based on surface functionalized nano-porous silicon. IEEE Sens. J. 18(24), 9940–9947 (2018)10.1109/JSEN.2018.2872846 ↗
51. American Diabetes Association, Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 37(1), S81–S90 (2014)10.2337/dc14-S081 ↗
52. M.A. Sharaf, Preparation of spherical nanoparticles: stober silica. J. Am. Sci. 6(11), 985–989 (2010)
53. G.H. Bogush, M.A. Tracy, C.F. Zukoski, Preparation of monodisperse silica particles—control of size and mass fraction. J. Noncryst. Solids 104, 95–106 (1988)10.1016/0022-3093(88)90187-1 ↗
54. M. Haggkvist, T.Q. Li, L. Odberg, Effects of drying and pressing on the pore structure in the cellulose fibre wall studied by 1H and 2H NMR relaxation. Cellulose 5, 33–49 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100921262877810.1023/A:1009212628778 ↗
55. M.A. Ashraf, W. Peng, Y. Zare et al., Effects of size and aggregation/agglomeration of nanoparticles on the interfacial/interphase properties and tensile strength of polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13, 214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2624-010.1186/s11671-018-2624-0 ↗
56. S. Samal, Effect of shape and size of filler particle on the aggregation and sedimentation behavior of the polymer composite. Powder Technol. 366, 43–51 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.05410.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.054 ↗
57. K. Chitra, Fluorescent silica nanoparticles in the detection and control of the growth of pathogen. J. Nanotechnol. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/50962810.1155/2013/509628 ↗
58. R.S.C.M. de Queiroz Antonino, B.R.P. Lia Fook, V.A. de Oliveira Lima, R.Í. de Farias Rached, E.P.N. Lima, R.J. da Silva Lima, C.A. Peniche Covas, M.V. Lia Fook, Preparation and characterization of chitosan obtained from shells of shrimp. Mar. Drugs 15, 141 (2017)10.3390/md15050141 ↗
59. M. García, J. Marchese, N. Ochoa, Effect of the particle size and particle agglomeration on composite membrane performance. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 118, 2417–2424 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3227410.1002/app.32274 ↗
60. J.N. Sun, Y. Hu, W.E. Frieze, W. Chen, D.W. Gidley, “How pore size and surface roughness affect diffusion barrier continuity on porous low-k films.” J. Electrochem. Soc. 150(5), 97 (2003)10.1149/1.1565140 ↗
61. P. Negrea, A. Caunii, I. Sarac, M. Butnariu, “The study of infrared spectrum of chitin and chitosan extract as potential sources of biomass.” Digest J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 10(4), 1129–1138 (2015)
62. S. Iftiquar, Structural studies on semiconducting hydrogenated amorphous silicon oxide films. High Temp. Mater. Processes (Int. Q. High-Technol. Plasma Processes) (2003). https://doi.org/10.1615/HighTempMatProc.v6.i1.4010.1615/HighTempMatProc.v6.i1.40 ↗
63. A. Beganskienė, V. Sirutkaitis, M. Kurtinaitienė, R. Juškėnas, A. Kareiva, FTIR, TEM and NMR investigations of stöber silica nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. (Medžiagotyra) 10(4), 1392–1320 (2004)
64. S. Jana, S. Garain, S. Sen, D. Mandal, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP01820J10.1039/C5CP01820J ↗
65. G.C. Psarras, Fundamentals of Dielectric Theories. Dielectric Polymer Materials for High-Density Energy Storage (William Andrew Publishing, Elsevier, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813215-9.00002-610.1016/B978-0-12-813215-9.00002-6 ↗
66. T. Tanaka, M. Kozako, N. Fuse, Y. Ohki, Proposal of a multi-core model for polymer nanocomposite dielectrics. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 12(4), 669–681 (2005)10.1109/TDEI.2005.1511092 ↗