Vibration suppression analysis and experimental test of additional constrained damping layer in space science experiment cabinet
Source abstract
Abstract
Aiming at the problem that the vibration of the space science experimental cabinet is too large during the launch phase of the rocket, the viscoelastic constrained damping layer is used to suppress the vibration. Firstly, to explore the vibration suppression mechanism of the constrained damping layer, the dynamic model of the constrained damping layer is established and the modal loss factor is calculated. Secondly, the influence of the modulus, material thickness, and the position and the area of the damping layer on the loss factor of the structure is analyzed. Finally, the simulation and experiment methods are used to calculate and verify the space science experiment cabinet with additional constrained damping layer. The results show that the viscoelastic constrained damping can effectively reduce the vibration level of the space science experiment cabinet, and the acceleration response in the resonance region is reduced by more than 56%. The viscoelastic constrained damping structure is simple and easy to realize, which can suppress the vibration of the space payload design is of great significance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis and Optimization · Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Institutes for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Funding
Jiang Xin-song Innovation Fund
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang J · 2017
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.03710.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.037 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.11.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.11.004 ↗
4. Kattimani SC · Mech Syst Signal Process · 2018 · 106 · 33410.1016/j.ymssp.2017.12.039 ↗
5. Gui HB · J Ship Mech · 2016 · 20 · 1331
6. Ji B · Comput Mat Sci · 2015 · 3 · 12
7. Kliem M · Appl Compos Mater · 2018 · 26 · 1
8. 10.1121/1.190782110.1121/1.1907821 ↗
9. Mead DJ · J Sound Vib · 1969 · 12 · 271
10. Chen Q · Comput Struct · 2000 · 74 · 5110.1016/S0045-7949(98)00321-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.02.01610.1016/j.jsv.2006.02.016 ↗
12. 10.1177/002199831141764610.1177/0021998311417646 ↗
13. Stenackers G · Appl Compos Mater · 2016 · 23 · 117710.1007/s10443-016-9507-2 ↗
14. Huang ZC · Materials · 2019 · 12 · 338910.3390/ma12203390 ↗
15. Ehrig T · Mater Today Commun · 2018 · 16 · 20410.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.06.006 ↗
16. Cao X · Aerosp Sci Technol · 2017 · 67 · 38710.1016/j.ast.2017.04.014 ↗
17. Shijie X · IEEE Access · 2018 · 6 · 35327
18. 10.1177/00219983920260120410.1177/002199839202601204 ↗
19. 10.2514/3.5119010.2514/3.51190 ↗
20. Zhou T · Inten Environ · 2014 · 52 · 53
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10773910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107739 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.10650010.1016/j.tws.2019.106500 ↗
23. Bisheh H · Int J Mech Sci · 2019 · 16 · 161
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.06410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.064 ↗
25. 10.1177/146134841882177310.1177/1461348418821773 ↗
26. Luo H · Noise Vib Contr · 2019 · 39 · 1