Electrospun nano-barium titanate/polycaprolactone composite coatings on titanium and Ti13Nb13Zr alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Using coated implant materials has been demonstrated to enhance bone regeneration and expedite healing around implant sites significantly. Generally, employing a polymeric matrix reinforced with ceramic materials has been considered a promising composite material for the coating of implants. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of mixing varying concentrations of nano-barium titanate (nanoBaTiO3) (9, 18, and 36 wt%) to polycaprolactone (PCL) (18 wt%) on the properties of coatings applied to commercially pure titanium (CpTi) and Ti13Nb13Zr alloys implant materials. The electrospinning technique was utilised to fabricate the coatings, and the samples were characterised using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to investigate the composite coating’s surface roughness and topography; the incorporation of a high amount of BaTiO3 resulted in increased roughness of the coating layer on CpTi and Ti13Nb13Zr alloys (69.78 nm and 96.88 nm, respectively). Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) was used to investigate the surface morphology; the fibre diameters of BT/PCL composite were 80 to 534 nm for different mixture concentrations. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) verified the chemical bonds in the composite coating. Results indicated that increasing the proportion of nano-barium titanate in the coating composition reduced water contact angles and enhanced the adhesion strength of the composite coating to the substrate. These findings provide valuable information for developing new coating materials to promote the growth of new bone and accelerate healing around implants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mustansiriyah University
University of Baghdad
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac010.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac0 ↗
2. 10.3390/ijms1104158010.3390/ijms11041580 ↗
3. 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.5010.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.50 ↗
4. Ng D, Wong A, Liston P. Multidisciplinary approach to implants: a review. N Z Dent J 2012; 108(4): 123–128.
5. 10.2174/187421060140801005010.2174/1874210601408010050 ↗
6. 10.5101/nbe.v11i4.p361-36710.5101/nbe.v11i4.p361-367 ↗
7. Jayesh RS, Dhinakarsamy V. Osseointegration. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015; 7(Suppl 1): S226–S229.10.4103/0975-7406.155917 ↗
8. 10.1002/adem.20180121510.1002/adem.201801215 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10856-016-5707-410.1007/s10856-016-5707-4 ↗
10. 10.1177/2633366X2097468610.1177/2633366X20974686 ↗
11. Mohammed MT, Khan ZA, Siddiquee AN. Beta titanium alloys: the lowest elastic modulus for biomedical applications: a review. Int J Chem Mol Nucl Mater Met Eng 2014; 8(8): 726.
12. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1401012610.3390/ma14010126 ↗
14. Farazin A, Aghadavoudi F, Motififard M, et al. Nanostructure, molecular dynamics simulation and mechanical performance of PCL membranes reinforced with antibacterial nanoparticles. J Appl Comput Mech 2021; 7(4): 1907–1915.
15. Ertuğ B. The overview of the electrical properties of barium titanate. Am J Eng Res 2013; 2(8): 1–7.
16. 10.1038/srep3350810.1038/srep33508 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.12110.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.121 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.21510.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.215 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.00310.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.08410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.084 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11763110.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117631 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.4979710.1002/app.49797 ↗
23. 10.1177/2633366X1989792310.1177/2633366X19897923 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.15510.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.155 ↗
25. Farazin A. A polycaprolactone bio-nanocomposite bone substitute fabricated for femoral fracture approaches: Molecular dynamic and micromechanical Investigation. J Nanoanalysis 2019; 6(3): 172–184.
26. Petretta M, Gambardella A, Boi M, et al. Composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration based on PCL and Mg-containing bioactive glasses. Biology (Basel) 2021; 10(5): 398.
27. Kallagunta H, Tate JS. Influence of surface functionalization of ceramic nanofibers on morphological, physical and mechanical properties of unsaturated polyester nanocomposites. Compos Adv Mater 2022; 31(26349833221087276): 263498332210872.
28. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11153010.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111530 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11219210.1016/j.msec.2021.112192 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10897310.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108973 ↗
31. Kazeroni ZS. A mitral heart valve prototype using sustainable polyurethane polymer: fabricated by 3D bioprinter, tested by molecular dynamics simulation. AUT J Mech Eng 2021; 5(1): 109–120.
32. 10.3390/polym1208180610.3390/polym12081806 ↗
33. 10.1002/pat.456310.1002/pat.4563 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.12489810.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.124898 ↗
35. 10.3390/polym1210242110.3390/polym12102421 ↗
36. Loizou K, Evangelou A, Marangos O, et al. Assessing the performance of electrospun nanofabrics as potential interlayer reinforcement materials for fiber-reinforced polymers. Compos Adv Mater 2021; 30(26349833211002520): 263498332110025.
37. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100173-8.00006-510.1016/B978-0-08-100173-8.00006-5 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.mseb.2017.01.00110.1016/j.mseb.2017.01.001 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11081210.1016/j.msec.2020.110812 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15647110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156471 ↗
41. 10.3390/biom1303055010.3390/biom13030550 ↗
42. 10.1002/app.4106810.1002/app.41068 ↗
43. 10.21123/bsj.15.3.253-26110.21123/bsj.15.3.253-261 ↗
44. 10.1371/journal.pone.016529610.1371/journal.pone.0165296 ↗
45. 10.1007/978-3-642-36427-310.1007/978-3-642-36427-3 ↗
46. 10.21123/bsj.2019.16.3.063210.21123/bsj.2019.16.3.0632 ↗
47. Safi IN, Al-Shammari AM, Ul-Jabbar MA, et al. Preparing polycaprolactone scaffolds using electrospinning technique for construction of artificial periodontal ligament tissue. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2020; 15(5): 363–373.
48. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.00310.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.003 ↗
49. Icoglu H, Oğulata R. Effect of ambient parameters on morphology of electrospun polyetherimide (PEI) fibers. Tekst ve Konfeksiyon 2013; 23(4).
50. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.01010.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.010 ↗
51. 10.1002/jbm.a.3230310.1002/jbm.a.32303 ↗
52. 10.1556/2051.2018.0005710.1556/2051.2018.00057 ↗
53. 10.1186/s40729-017-0095-110.1186/s40729-017-0095-1 ↗
54. 10.3390/gels805032310.3390/gels8050323 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.052 ↗
56. 10.12816/001526010.12816/0015260 ↗
57. Zhao L. Surface polishing of niobium for superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavity application, 2015.
58. Godoy D. Influence of surface treatments on corrosion resistance properties of ultrafine grained Titanium alloys for implant applications. In: Université grenoble alpes. Universidade federal de São Carlos, 2019.
59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.009 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.07.05310.1016/j.susc.2006.07.053 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.10996010.1016/j.msec.2019.109960 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.01810.1016/j.snb.2016.10.018 ↗
63. 10.3390/polym1210223310.3390/polym12102233 ↗
64. 10.1007/s10832-007-9402-110.1007/s10832-007-9402-1 ↗
65. 10.12816/003874810.12816/0038748 ↗
66. 10.3390/jcs302004510.3390/jcs3020045 ↗
67. 10.3390/ma1523864110.3390/ma15238641 ↗
68. 10.3390/nano810086010.3390/nano8100860 ↗
69. Kar M. Synthesis and characterization of ferroelectric polymer ceramic composites, 2014.
70. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.26710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.267 ↗
71. 10.1039/C9RA01174A10.1039/C9RA01174A ↗
72. Bilgili HK. Analysis of PCL based functionally gradient bone scaffolds fabricated using NIPS based 3D printing, 2021.
73. 10.26477/jbcd.v33i4.301610.26477/jbcd.v33i4.3016 ↗
74. 10.1038/s41598-020-80729-910.1038/s41598-020-80729-9 ↗
75. 10.1590/1678-77572014048310.1590/1678-775720140483 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.05210.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.052 ↗
77. 10.5006/S2015-0001910.5006/S2015-00019 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.03.02010.1016/j.arabjc.2018.03.020 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10245010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102450 ↗
80. 10.7569/RAA.2016.0971310.7569/RAA.2016.09713 ↗
81. 10.21608/msadj.2023.174580.101210.21608/msadj.2023.174580.1012 ↗
82. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.117213310.3389/fbioe.2023.1172133 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.xphs.2023.08.01710.1016/j.xphs.2023.08.017 ↗
84. 10.3390/biom1306101110.3390/biom13061011 ↗
85. 10.3390/biomedicines1108214610.3390/biomedicines11082146 ↗