Influence of fiber surface treatment on the mechanical properties of sisal fiber reinforced polylactic acid bio-composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Gaining an understanding of how chemical treatment affects the mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites is essential to enhance their performance and broaden their applicability across various engineering domains. The objective of this study was to develop bio-composites by combining polylactic acid with sisal fibers that have undergone chemical treatments and evaluating the mechanical properties at different temperatures to determine their suitability for high-temperature applications. For this purpose, sisal fibers were chemically treated using alkali, acetylation, and alkali/acetylation solution before composite processing. The results revealed that tensile strength slightly improved by alkali treatment, while both alkali/acetylation and acetylation treatments decreased the tensile strength and tensile modulus. Alkali treatment significantly enhanced flexural strength, while the effect of acetylation and alkali/acetylation treatments on flexural strength was less pronounced. All chemical treatments led to a slight increase in flexural strain at failure, but resulted in a decrease in tensile strain at failure and tensile modulus. Alkali treatment slightly increased flexural modulus, while acetylation and alkali/acetylation treatments significantly reduced it. The impact strength of the bio-composites was increased by alkali and acetylation treatments, but significantly reduced by alkali/acetylation treatment. Furthermore, the flexural strength of all bio-composites decreased as temperature increased, especially in plasticized bio-composites using tributyl 2-acetylcitrate plasticizer. The flexural strain at failure decreased with the addition of tributyl 2-acetylcitrate at room temperature. In plasticized bio-composites, the flexural strain at failure increased at 35°C, but decreased at 45°C. On the other hand, the flexural strain at failure of non-plasticized bio-composites remained constant up to 35°C, slightly increased up to 45°C, and then significantly increased at temperatures above 45°C. These bio-composites could be suitable for packaging industry as biodegradability is the criteria for such applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Tribology and Wear Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia
Research Group ProPoliS, Department of Materials Engineering, KU Leuven Campus Bruges, Bruges, Belgium
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Funding
Ministry of Education · KU Leuven
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/polym1307112410.3390/polym13071124 ↗
2. 10.3390/polym1324442510.3390/polym13244425 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.08310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.083 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.032 ↗
5. 10.1080/15440478.2023.217263910.1080/15440478.2023.2172639 ↗
6. 10.1177/073168441558478410.1177/0731684415584784 ↗
7. 10.2991/ifeea-15.2016.6010.2991/ifeea-15.2016.60 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.01110.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.011 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.025 ↗
10. 10.1177/089270571349522110.1177/0892705713495221 ↗
11. 10.1080/09276440.2018.143963910.1080/09276440.2018.1439639 ↗
12. 10.4314/ijest.v6i4.910.4314/ijest.v6i4.9 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12221-018-7199-310.1007/s12221-018-7199-3 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.04510.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.045 ↗
15. 10.1177/073168441880202210.1177/0731684418802022 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1467410.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14674 ↗
17. 10.3390/polym1515322210.3390/polym15153222 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.04210.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.042 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.008 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60126-410.1016/S1003-6326(10)60126-4 ↗
21. 10.3390/polym1415308010.3390/polym14153080 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-3-030-80618-7_3210.1007/978-3-030-80618-7_32 ↗
23. 10.1155/2023/704293210.1155/2023/7042932 ↗
24. 10.3390/jcs302005210.3390/jcs3020052 ↗
25. 10.1177/0892705724123564910.1177/08927057241235649 ↗
26. Ingeo NatureWorks.TM · biopolymer 3D850 technical data sheet 3D printing monofilament – general purpose grade · 2021 · 1
27. 10.1080/15440478.2024.232555710.1080/15440478.2024.2325557 ↗
28. Roell Z. Testing of plastics and rubber intelligent testing. 2011. https://www.zwick.com/en/plastics/thermoplastic-and-thermosetting-molding-materials/tensile-test-iso-527-astm-d638
29. ISO · 527-1 · 2006 · 2012 · 13
30. ISO · Iso 178 · 2019 · 2019 · 1
31. ISO 179-1 · ISO - Int Stand Organ · 2010 · 2010 · 1
32. 10.3390/fib812007310.3390/fib8120073 ↗
33. 10.3390/molecules2424458510.3390/molecules24244585 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.25710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.257 ↗
35. 10.1177/089270572094422010.1177/0892705720944220 ↗
36. 10.1007/978-3-642-17370-710.1007/978-3-642-17370-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.tca.2010.04.00810.1016/j.tca.2010.04.008 ↗
38. 10.1177/152808372092477410.1177/1528083720924774 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.004 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2451110.1002/pc.24511 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.11410.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.114 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.00410.1016/j.dt.2019.06.004 ↗