Separating grain boundary migration mechanisms in molecular dynamics simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of grain boundary (GB) migration it is quite common to find a temperature dependence of GB mobility that deviates strongly from an Arrhenius-type dependence. This usually indicates that more than one mechanism is actually active. With the goal to separate different GB migration mechanisms we investigate a Σ7 38.2° GB by MD using an EAM potential for aluminium. To drive the GB with a well-known and adjustable force, the e nergy c onserving o rientational d riving f orce (ECO DF) is used that had been introduced recently. The magnitude of the DF and the temperature are varied. This yielded a high and a low temperature range for the GB velocity, with a transition temperature that depends on the magnitude of the DF. A method is introduced which allows both a visual and a statistical characterization of GB motion on a per atom basis. These analyses reveal that two mechanisms are active in this GB, a shuffling mechanism and its initiation. These mechanisms operate in a sequential, coupled manner. Based on this, a simple model is introduced that describes all simulated GB velocities (and hence the mobility) very well, including the transition between the dominating mechanisms.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. The compensation effect in thermally activated interface processes10.1023/A:1008649619917 ↗
2. Theory of grain boundary motion10.1103/PhysRev.83.69 ↗
3. Turnbull · Trans. AIME · 1951 · 191 · 661
4. Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals—II: grain boundary mobility10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.015 ↗
5. Trends in grain boundary mobility: survey of motion mechanisms10.1007/s11837-013-0801-2 ↗
6. grain boundary interface roughening transition and its effect on grain boundary mobility for non-faceting boundaries10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.07.045 ↗
7. Molecular dynamics simulations of grain boundary mobility in Al, Cu and γ-Fe using a symmetrical driving force10.1088/0965-0393/22/5/055011 ↗
8. Zhou · 2011
9. Diffusive-to-ballistic transition in grain boundary motion studied by atomistic simulations10.1103/PhysRevB.84.214102 ↗
10. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
11. Interatomic potentials for atomistic simulations of the Ti-Al system10.1103/PhysRevB.68.024102 ↗
12. Towards realistic molecular dynamics simulations of grain boundary mobility10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.008 ↗
13. Migration of the Σ7 tilt grain boundary in al under an applied external stress10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.030 ↗
14. Phenomenology of shear-coupled grain boundary motion in symmetric tilt and general grain boundaries10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.005 ↗
15. Energy conserving orientational force for determining grain boundary mobility10.1088/0965-0393/23/2/025007 ↗
16. Molecular dynamics simulations of grain boundary mobility in Al, Cu and γ-Fe using a symmetrical driving force10.1088/0965-0393/22/5/055011 ↗
17. The effect of synthetic driving force on the atomic mechanisms associated with grain boundary motion below the interface roughening temperature10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.022 ↗
18. 2015
19. Interface mobility from interface random walk10.1126/science.1131988 ↗
20. Computing the mobility of grain boundaries10.1038/nmat1559 ↗
21. On the effect of purity and orientation on grain boundary motion10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00277-2 ↗
22. Volin · Phys. Status Solidi (b) · 1968 · 25 · 16310.1002/pssb.19680250116 ↗