journal article·2006-12

Structural performance of metallic sandwich beams with hollow truss cores

H.J. Rathbun, F.W. Zok, S.A. Waltner, C. Mercer, A.G. Evans, D.T. Queheillalt, H.N.G. Wadley

Acta Materialia· Volume 54· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

The article focuses on the structural performance of sandwich beams with hollow truss lattice cores made from a ductile stainless steel. The trusses are arranged in an orthogonal (cross-ply) configuration, in either ±45° (diamond) or 0°/90° (square) orientations with respect to the face sheets. The responses in shear, tension and compression, as well as simply supported and fully clamped bending, are measured for specimens with both core orientations. While the two cores perform equally well in compression, the diamond orientation exhibits higher shear strength but lower stretch resistance. For bend-dominated loadings of the sandwich beams, the core in the diamond orientation is preferred because of its higher shear strength. For stretch-dominated loadings encountered in large-displacement, fully clamped bending, the square orientation is superior. Models of core and beam yielding are used to rationalize these observations. Optimizations are then performed to identify strong lightweight designs and to enable performance comparisons with other sandwich structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Wicks · Int J Solids Struct · 2001 · 38 · 516510.1016/S0020-7683(00)00315-2 ↗
2. Rathbun · Int J Solids Struct · 2005 · 42 · 664310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.044 ↗
3. Zok · Int J Solids Struct · 2003 · 40 · 570710.1016/S0020-7683(03)00375-5 ↗
4. Zok · Int J Solids Struct · 2004 · 41 · 624910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.05.045 ↗
5. Zok · Phil Mag · 2005 · 85 · 320710.1080/14786430500073945 ↗
6. Qiu · Eur J Mech – A/Solids · 2003 · 22 · 80110.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.09.002 ↗
7. Fleck · J Appl Mech · 2004 · 71 · 38610.1115/1.1629109 ↗
8. Rathbun · J Appl Mech · 2004 · 71 · 36810.1115/1.1757487 ↗
9. Xue · Int J Impact Eng · 2004 · 30 · 128310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007 ↗
10. Lu · J Mech Phys Solids · 2001 · 49 · 207110.1016/S0022-5096(01)00024-2 ↗
11. Hutchinson · Int J Solids Struct · 2003 · 40 · 696910.1016/S0020-7683(03)00348-2 ↗
12. Lucato · Int J Solids Struct · 2004 · 41 · 352110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.012 ↗
13. Evans · Prog Mater Sci · 2001 · 46 · 30910.1016/S0079-6425(00)00016-5 ↗
14. Tian · Int J Heat Mass Transfer · 2004 · 47 · 317110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.02.010 ↗
15. Boomsa · Int J Heat and Mass Transfer · 2001 · 44 · 82710.1016/S0017-9310(00)00123-X ↗
16. Tian · Int J Heat Mass Transfer · 2004 · 47 · 317110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.02.010 ↗
17. Queheillalt · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 30310.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.024 ↗
18. Queheillalt · Mater Sci Eng · 2005 · A397 · 13210.1016/j.msea.2005.02.048 ↗
19. NICROBRAZ® technical data sheet, Wall Colmonoy Corporation, Madison Heights, MI, 1995.
20. Rathbun HJ, Zok FW, Evans AG, in press.
21. Roark · 1975