The controlled microfluidic formation of stable mixed phase HCP/FCC-UiO-67(Zr)-benzoic acid through modification of water concentration
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work reports the synthesis of a mixed crystal phase mesoporous metal–organic framework (MOF) through a new synthesis route. The Hexagonal Centred Planar/Face Centred Cubic mixed phase UiO-67(Zr) product was microfluidically synthesised using benzoic acid as the acid modulator. This phase ratio can be altered through changing the concentration of water present in the reaction solution. This product shows increased mesoporosity and uptake of N2 at 77 K and 1 bar of 1083 cm3/g, as compared to 615 cm3/g for the product made via the traditional batch approach. This leads to an increase working capacity due to the change in isotherm type, from type I to type IV, with the uptake occurring more gradually overall as pressure increases. An increased working capacity allows for a greater range of control for the volume of N2 stored in/released from the material. This product has only been successful in microfluidic conditions, highlighting the potential importance of this method for future synthesis of this MOF.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Schaate, P. Roy, A. Godt, J. Lippke, F. Waltz, M. Wiebcke, P. Behrens, Modulated synthesis of Zr-based metal-organic frameworks: from nano to single crystals. Chemistry 17, 6643–6651 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20100321110.1002/chem.201003211 ↗
2. J.H. Cavka, S. Jakobsen, U. Olsbye, N. Guillou, C. Lamberti, S. Bordiga, K.P. Lillerud, A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13850–13851 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja805795310.1021/ja8057953 ↗
3. R. Vaidhyanathan, S.S. Iremonger, K.W. Dawson, G.K.H. Shimizu, An amine-functionalized metal organic framework for preferential CO2 adsorption at low pressures. Chem. Commun. 35, 5230–5232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/b911481e10.1039/b911481e ↗
4. D. Han, F.L. Jiang, M.Y. Wu, L. Chen, Q.H. Chen, M.C. Hong, A Non-interpenetrated porous metal-organic framework with high gas-uptake capacity. Chem. Commun. 47, 9861–9863 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc12858b10.1039/c1cc12858b ↗
5. Z. Chen, S. Xiang, H.D. Arman, P. Li, D. Zhao, B. Chen, Significantly enhanced CO2/CH4 separation selectivity within a 3D prototype metal-organic framework functionalized with OH groups on pore surfaces at room temperature. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 14, 2227–2231 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.20110003410.1002/ejic.201100034 ↗
6. K. Sumida, C.M. Brown, Z.R. Herm, S. Chavan, S. Bordiga, J.R. Long, Hydrogen storage properties and neutron scattering studies of Mg2(Dobdc)—a metal-organic framework with Open Mg2+ adsorption sites. Chem. Commun. 47, 1157–1159 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc03453c10.1039/c0cc03453c ↗
7. J. Lee, O.K. Farha, J. Roberts, K.A. Scheidt, S.T. Nguyen, J.T. Hupp, Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1450–1459 (2009)10.1039/b807080f ↗
8. C.C. Hou, T.T. Li, S. Cao, Y. Chen, W.F. Fu, Incorporation of a [Ru(Dcbpy)(Bpy)2]2+ photosensitizer and a Pt(Dcbpy)Cl2 catalyst into metal-organic frameworks for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from aqueous solution. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 10386–10394 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta01135c10.1039/c5ta01135c ↗
9. A.M. Abdel-Mageed, B. Rungtaweevoranit, M. Parlinska-Wojtan, X. Pei, O.M. Yaghi, R. Jürgen Behm, highly active and stable single-atom Cu catalysts supported by a metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 5201–5210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b1138610.1021/jacs.8b11386 ↗
10. M. Liu, J. Wu, H. Hou, Metal–organic framework (MOF)-based materials as heterogeneous catalysts for C−H bond activation. Chemistry 25, 2935–2948 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20180414910.1002/chem.201804149 ↗
11. C.-D. Wu, M. Zhao, Incorporation of molecular catalysts in metal–organic frameworks for highly efficient heterogeneous catalysis. Adv. Mater. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160544610.1002/adma.201605446 ↗
12. C. Kutzscher, G. Nickerl, I. Senkovska, V. Bon, S. Kaskel, Proline functionalized UiO-67 and UiO-68 type metal-organic frameworks showing reversed diastereoselectivity in aldol addition reactions. Chem. Mater. 28, 2573–2580 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0457510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04575 ↗
13. R.E. Morris, P.S. Wheatley, Gas storage in nanoporous materials. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 47, 4966–4981 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20070393410.1002/anie.200703934 ↗
14. L. Li, S. Tang, C. Wang, X. Lv, M. Jiang, H. Wu, X. Zhao, High gas storage capacities and stepwise adsorption in a UiO type metal–organic framework incorporating lewis basic bipyridyl sites. Chem. Commun. 50, 2304–2307 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc48275h10.1039/c3cc48275h ↗
15. B.M. Connolly, M. Aragones-Anglada, J. Gandara-Loe, N.A. Danaf, D.C. Lamb, J.P. Mehta, D. Vulpe, S. Wuttke, J. Silvestre-Albero, P.Z. Moghadam, A.E.H. Wheatley, D. Fairen-Jimenez, Tuning porosity in macroscopic monolithic metal-organic frameworks for exceptional natural gas storage. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10185-110.1038/s41467-019-10185-1 ↗
16. C. Atzori, G.C. Shearer, L. Maschio, B. Civalleri, F. Bonino, C. Lamberti, S. Svelle, K.P. Lillerud, S. Bordiga, Effect of benzoic acid as a modulator in the structure of UiO-66: an experimental and computational study. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 9312–9324 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0048310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00483 ↗
17. G. Kaur, S. Øien-ødegaard, A. Lazzarini, S.M. Chavan, S. Bordiga, K.P. Lillerud, U. Olsbye, Controlling the synthesis of metal–organic framework UiO-67 by tuning its kinetic driving force. Cryst. Growth Des. 19, 4246–4251 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.9b0091610.1021/acs.cgd.9b00916 ↗
18. G.C. Shearer, S. Chavan, S. Bordiga, S. Svelle, U. Olsbye, K.P. Lillerud, Defect engineering: tuning the porosity and composition of the metal-organic framework UiO-66 via modulated synthesis. Chem. Mater. 28, 3749–3761 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0060210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00602 ↗
19. M.J. Cliffe, E. Castillo-Martínez, Y. Wu, J. Lee, A.C. Forse, F.C.N. Firth, P.Z. Moghadam, D. Fairen-Jimenez, M.W. Gaultois, J.A. Hill, O.V. Magdysyuk, B. Slater, A.L. Goodwin, C.P. Grey, Metal-organic nanosheets formed via defect-mediated transformation of a hafnium metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 5397–5404 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b0010610.1021/jacs.7b00106 ↗
20. F.C.N. Firth, M.J. Cliffe, D. Vulpe, M. Aragones-Anglada, P.Z. Moghadam, D. Fairen-Jimenez, B. Slater, C.P. Grey, Engineering new defective phases of UiO family metal-organic frameworks with water. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 7459–7469 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA10682G10.1039/C8TA10682G ↗
21. C.A. Clark, K.N. Heck, C.D. Powell, M.S. Wong, Highly defective UiO-66 materials for the adsorptive removal of perfluorooctanesulfonate. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 6619–6628 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0557210.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05572 ↗
22. X. Chen, Y. Lyu, Z. Wang, X. Qiao, B.C. Gates, D. Yang, Tuning Zr12O22 node defects as catalytic sites in the metal-organic framework Hcp UiO-66. ACS Catal. 10, 2906–2914 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b0490510.1021/acscatal.9b04905 ↗
23. C. Ma, L. Zheng, G. Wang, J. Guo, L. Li, Q. He, Y. Chen, H. Zhang, Phase engineering of metal-organic frameworks. Aggregate 3, 1–15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/agt2.14510.1002/agt2.145 ↗
24. I. Goodenough, V.S.D. Devulapalli, W. Xu, M.C. Boyanich, T.Y. Luo, M. De Souza, M. Richard, N.L. Rosi, E. Borguet, Interplay between intrinsic thermal stability and expansion properties of functionalized UiO-67 metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Mater. 33, 910–920 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0388910.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03889 ↗
25. R. Dai, F. Peng, P. Ji, K. Lu, C. Wang, J. Sun, W. Lin, Electron crystallography reveals atomic structures of metal-organic nanoplates with M12(Μ3-O)8(Μ3-OH)8(Μ2-OH)6 (M = Zr, Hf) secondary building units. Inorg. Chem. 56, 8128–8134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0084510.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00845 ↗
26. X. Zhang, X. Shi, Q. Zhao, Y. Li, J. Wang, Y. Yang, F. Bi, J. Xu, N. Liu, Defects controlled by acid-modulators and water molecules enabled UiO-67 for exceptional toluene uptakes: an experimental and theoretical study. Chem. Eng. J. 427, 131573 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13157310.1016/j.cej.2021.131573 ↗
27. Q. Zhao, Q. Du, Y. Yang, Z. Zhao, J. Cheng, F. Bi, X. Shi, J. Xu, X. Zhang, Effects of regulator ratio and guest molecule diffusion on VOCs adsorption by defective UiO-67: experimental and theoretical insights. Chem. Eng. J. 433, 134510 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.13451010.1016/j.cej.2022.134510 ↗
28. G. Hu, L. Yang, Y. Li, L. Wang, Continuous and scalable fabrication of stable and biocompatible MOF@SiO2 nanoparticles for drug loading. J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 7936–7942 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8tb02308e10.1039/c8tb02308e ↗
29. O. Kolmykov, J.M. Commenge, H. Alem, E. Girot, K. Mozet, G. Medjahdi, R. Schneider, Microfluidic reactors for the size-controlled synthesis of ZIF-8 crystals in aqueous phase. Mater. Des. 122, 31–41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.00210.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.002 ↗
30. M. Faustini, J. Kim, G.Y. Jeong, J.Y. Kim, H.R. Moon, W.S. Ahn, D.P. Kim, Microfluidic approach toward continuous and ultrafast synthesis of metal-organic framework crystals and hetero structures in confined microdroplets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 14619–14626 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja403964210.1021/ja4039642 ↗
31. T. Bailey, M. Pinto, N. Hondow, K.J. Wu, Continuous microfluidic synthesis of zirconium-based UiO-67 using a coiled flow invertor reactor. MethodsX 8, 101246 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.10124610.1016/j.mex.2021.101246 ↗
32. M. Taddei, J.A. Van Bokhoven, M. Ranocchiari, Influence of water in the synthesis of the zirconium-based metal-organic framework UiO-66: isolation and reactivity of [ZrCl(OH)2(DMF)2]Cl. Inorg. Chem. 59, 7860–7868 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c0099110.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00991 ↗
33. O. Zaremba, J. Andreo, S. Wuttke, The chemistry behind room temperature synthesis of hafnium and cerium UiO-66 derivatives. Inorg. Chem. Front. 9, 5210–5216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2qi01198k10.1039/d2qi01198k ↗
34. S.E. Bambalaza, H.W. Langmi, R. Mokaya, N.M. Musyoka, J. Ren, L.E. Khotseng, Compaction of a zirconium metal-organic framework (UiO-66) for high density hydrogen storage applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 23569–23577 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA09227C10.1039/C8TA09227C ↗
35. X. Zhang, Y. Yang, X. Lv, Y. Wang, N. Liu, D. Chen, L. Cui, Adsorption/desorption kinetics and breakthrough of gaseous toluene for modified microporous-mesoporous UiO-66 metal organic framework. J. Hazard. Mater. 366, 140–150 (2019)10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.099 ↗